Literature DB >> 33563235

Is early full weight bearing safe following locking plate ORIF of distal fibula fractures?

Michael Zyskowski1, Markus Wurm1, Frederik Greve1, Sebastian Pesch1, Francesca von Matthey1, Patrick Pflüger1, Moritz Crönlein1, Peter Biberthaler1, Chlodwig Kirchhoff2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the modern western world appraisal of economical points such as treatment and disability after trauma present a financial burden. In this context open reduction internal fixation techniques allowing for early full weight bearing might not only improve the clinical outcome but also shorten the period of disability in working life. The aim of the study was to analyze whether ORIF of ankle fractures using either a standard semitubular plate or a new polyaxial locking plate system result in a better clinical outcome.
METHODS: In this prospective study, all patients with distal fibula fractures (AO 44 B1.1, B1.2, B1.3), with indication for surgery were included. Patients were randomized to either the DePuy Synthes® one-third semitubular plate (Group I) or NEWCLIP TECHNICS, Active Ankle® polyaxial locking plate (Group II). Primary outcome parameter was function of the ankle joint, assessed by the Olerud and Molander ankle score, Foot and Ankle outcome score and Karlsson and Peterson Scoring System for Ankle function. Secondary outcome parameter were postoperative complications. Superficial wound infection, delayed wound healing, mechanically prominent implant, skin irritations were considered as minor and deep wound infection, material loosening, loss of reduction were regarded as major complications requiring revision surgery. Clinical and radiological follow-up were performed 6 and 12 weeks, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively.
RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (31 W/21 M) with a mean age of 43 yrs. (range 22-64 yrs.) were enrolled. Seven patients (13.5%) were excluded, so that 45 patients were available for follow up. Twenty-five patients were treated with DePuy Synthes® one-third semitubular plate (55.6%; group I) while 20 patients received an anatomically preformed polyaxial locking plate (44.4%, group II). Four minor complications occurred in Group I (16%) compared to two minor complications in group II (10%). Significant better clinical results regarding OMAS (p < 0.02, < 0.04), KPSS (p < 0.04) and FAOS (p < 0.02, < 0.03) were observed 6 and 12 weeks after surgery in group II.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the presented study demonstrate a significant better clinical functional outcome in the early postoperative follow-up in patients treated with a polyaxial locking plate. Furthermore, our data show that ORIF using polyaxial locking plates in combination with an early postoperative weight bearing presents a safe, stable treatment option for ankle fractures so that patients benefit especially in the early stages of recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered 20 April 2020, retrospectively on ClinicalTrails.gov ( NCT04370561 ).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33563235      PMCID: PMC7874601          DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04009-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  51 in total

1.  Fixation of osteoporotic distal fibula fractures: A biomechanical comparison of locking versus conventional plates.

Authors:  Todd Kim; Ugur M Ayturk; Andrew Haskell; Theodore Miclau; Christian M Puttlitz
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.286

2.  Locking versus non-locking one-third tubular plates for treating osteoporotic distal fibula fractures: a comparative study.

Authors:  Mario Herrera-Pérez; Maria J Gutiérrez-Morales; Ayron Guerra-Ferraz; Jose L Pais-Brito; Juan Boluda-Mengod; Gerardo L Garcés
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Early complications of surgery in operative treatment of ankle fractures in those over 60: a review of 186 cases.

Authors:  Ahmed Zaghloul; Behrooz Haddad; Richard Barksfield; Ben Davis
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 4.  [Documentation of self-reported patient outcomes in trauma surgery : Clinical benefits of patient reported outcome measures].

Authors:  M Müller; F Greve; P Rittstieg; M Beirer; P Biberthaler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of the distal fibula with the locking compression plate: first experience of 20 cases.

Authors:  Florian Hess; Christoph Sommer
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  The Lauge Hansen classification of malleolar fractures.

Authors:  J Yde
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1980-02

7.  Early Weightbearing and Range of Motion Versus Non-Weightbearing and Immobilization After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Unstable Ankle Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Niloofar Dehghan; Michael D McKee; Richard J Jenkinson; Emil H Schemitsch; Venessa Stas; Aaron Nauth; Jeremy A Hall; David J Stephen; Hans J Kreder
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Comparison of three plate system for lateral malleolar fixation.

Authors:  ZeYu Huang; Lei Liu; ChongQi Tu; Hui Zhang; Yue Fang; TianFu Yang; FuXing Pei
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Mono- versus polyaxial locking plates in distal femur fractures - a biomechanical comparison of the Non-Contact-Bridging- (NCB) and the PERILOC-plate.

Authors:  Bilal Farouk El-Zayat; Turgay Efe; Steffen Ruchholtz; Salim Khatib; Nina Timmesfeld; Antonio Krüger; Ralph Zettl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Three week versus six week immobilisation for stable Weber B type ankle fractures: randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority clinical trial.

Authors:  Tero Kortekangas; Heidi Haapasalo; Tapio Flinkkilä; Pasi Ohtonen; Simo Nortunen; Heikki-Jussi Laine; Teppo Ln Järvinen; Harri Pakarinen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.