| Literature DB >> 32192123 |
Zhenfeng Zang1,2, Yonghua Li1, Hairong Li1, Zhaohui Guo3, Ru Zhang1,2.
Abstract
Nonferrous smelting is an important source of heavy metals in soil, which causes different degrees of soil pollution, especially in lead-zinc (Pb/Zn) smelting areas. Based on the Pb/Zn environmental release during the Pb/Zn mineral smelting processes in 31 Chinese provinces from the period 2000 to 2015, the study analyzed the spatiotemporal variations in Pb/Zn environmental release at the national level and then evaluated the degree of soil pollution and potential ecological risk based on the heavy metal content in soil from Pb/Zn smelting areas. The results showed that from the period 2000 to 2015, the Pb release had a discrete trend, transferring from the middle east to the west, and the provinces with higher Pb releases were Henan Province, Yunnan Province, and Hunan Province. However, the Zn release showed a tendency towards spatial aggregation, and the release center of this heavy metal presented a shifting trend from south to north; additionally, the release of Zn was highest in Hunan Province. The pollution index analyses indicated that Cd, Pb, Cu, and Zn in Zhuzhou and Huludao all reached extremely polluted levels, while Tongguan was at a safe level. In Gejiu, Mianxian, Fengxian, Zhuzhou, Huludao, and Shaoguan, there were very high potential ecological risks, with Cd having the highest potential ecological risk in most smelting areas, followed by Pb.Entities:
Keywords: Pb/Zn smelting; environmental release; heavy metal pollution; potential ecological risk assessment; soil; spatiotemporal variation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32192123 PMCID: PMC7142466 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17061968
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1China’s mineral Pb/Zn production and environmental release from the period 2000 to 2015. (a) mineral Pb/Zn production; (b) environmental release of Pb/Zn.
Figure 2Spatial distribution characteristics of Pb environmental release in China. (a) spatial distribution of Pb in 2000; (b) spatial distribution of Pb in 2005; (c) spatial distribution of Pb in 2010; (d) spatial distribution of Pb in 2015.
Figure 3Spatial distribution characteristics of Zn environmental release in China. (a) spatial distribution of Zn in 2000; (b) spatial distribution of Zn in 2005; (c) spatial distribution of Zn in 2010; (d) spatial distribution of Zn in 2015.
The P and Z values of Pb/Zn environmental release in China from the period 2000 to 2015.
| Year | Moran’s I | P-Value | E(I) | Z-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2000 | 0.0651 | 0.2252 | −0.03125 | 1.2128 |
| 2005 | −0.0327 | 0.9834 | −0.03125 | −0.0209 | |
| 2010 | −0.0109 | 0.7843 | −0.03125 | 0.2737 | |
| 2015 | −0.0118 | 0.7954 | −0.03125 | 0.2593 | |
|
| 2000 | 0.0686 | 0.2206 | −0.03125 | 1.2249 |
| 2005 | 0.1156 | 0.0637 | −0.03125 | 1.8539 | |
| 2010 | 0.0152 | 0.5398 | −0.03125 | 0.6131 | |
| 2015 | 0.0455 | 0.3514 | −0.03125 | 0.9318 |
The concentration of heavy metals in soil (mg/kg), (the concentration is shown as an average).
| Region | N | Cd | Pb | Cu | Zn | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huize, Yunnan | 23 | 12.80 | 712.00 | 239.00 | 1688.00 | [ |
| Gejiu, Yunnan | 15 | 63.50 | 3347.50 | 117.00 | 2974.30 | [ |
| Lancang, Yunnan | 53 | 2.36 | 287.79 | 14.79 | 161.94 | [ |
| Hezhang, Guizhou | 8 | 43.00 | 9000.00 | 120.00 | 11,000.00 | [ |
| Bijie, Guizhou | 101 | 2.07 | 87.18 | 97.81 | 261.00 | [ |
| Baiyin a, Gansu | 33 | 15.93 | 392.59 | 330.81 | 737.18 | [ |
| Baiyin b, Gansu | 16 | 19.70 | 3510.00 | 426.00 | 332.00 | [ |
| Huixian a, Gansu | 21 | 4.37 | 418.00 | 29.50 | 90.10 | [ |
| Huixian b, Gansu | 27 | 9.85 | 655.89 | 37.24 | 435.89 | [ |
| Huixian c, Gansu | 20 | 3.12 | 214.00 | 25.80 | 79.50 | [ |
| Mianxian, Shaanxi | 17 | 39.74 | 165.08 | 52.05 | 1304.27 | [ |
| Fengxiang, Shaanxi | 27 | 0.95 | 53.50 | 30.81 | 118.27 | [ |
| Tongguan, Shaanxi | 18 | 0.26 | 94.63 | 26.10 | 68.60 | [ |
| Fengxian, Shaanxi | 9 | 33.79 | 412.28 | 59.14 | 556.73 | [ |
| Zhuzhou, Hunan | 10 | 108.18 | 7621.86 | 261.41 | 1249.20 | [ |
| Chenzhou, Hunan | 35 | 2.80 | 226.50 | 60.50 | 347.10 | [ |
| Jiyuan, Henan | 45 | 5.75 | 145.00 | 22.00 | 84.70 | [ |
| Jiaozuo, Henan | 135 | 1.70 | 42.33 | 15.98 | 67.77 | [ |
| Huludao, Liaoning | 113 | 60.94 | 443.10 | 247.80 | 4084.00 | [ |
| Youxi, Fujian | 12 | 8.28 | 699.25 | 114.88 | 670.47 | [ |
| Shaoguan, Guangdong | 13 | 25.61 | 1185.66 | 67.13 | 764.12 | [ |
Note: a, b, and c represent the different smelting areas in the same district, N represents the number of soil samples.
Figure 4Single pollution index of heavy metal in soil. (a) pollution index of Cd; (b) pollution index of Pb; (c) pollution index of Cu; (d) pollution index of Zn.
Figure 5The potential ecological index of heavy metal in soil. (a) potential ecological risk index of Cd; (b) potential ecological risk index of Pb; (c) potential ecological risk index of Cu; (d) potential ecological risk index of Zn; (e) comprehensive potential ecological risk index.