Literature DB >> 32190552

Revision total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of the quality and readability of information on the internet.

Gerard Anthony Sheridan1, Carl O'Brien2, Bassam A Masri2, Clive P Duncan2, Donald S Garbuz2.   

Abstract

The demand for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing. Information quality on the internet has been extensively analysed in relation to primary THA but no such analysis has ever been performed for revision THA. Our aim was to assess the quality and readability of this information. Three major internet search engines were searched for information on revision THA. All websites were assessed for quality of information using the DISCERN score, the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria and a novel scoring system specific to revision THA [Vancouver Revision Arthroplasty Information (VRAI) score]. Website readability was assessed, as was presence of the Health On the Net Foundation (HON) seal. The majority of websites (52%) were academic with a post-graduate reading level. Only 6.5% of websites had the HON seal. Twenty-eight percent of websites had a 'good' DISCERN score and only 28% had a 'good' score with the novel VRAI scoring system. Health information websites had significantly higher rates of 'good' VRAI scores (P = 0.008). Websites with the HON seal had significantly higher DISCERN scores (P = 0.01). All governmental websites were at a reading level suitable for patient review. Information on the internet relating to revision THA is of low quality, much lower than the quality of information on primary THA. We recommend governmental websites for their readability and health information websites for their quality of information specific to revision THA. Websites with the HON seal provide higher quality information and should be recommended to patients as reading material regarding revision THA. ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Hip; Internet; Quality; Readability; Revision

Year:  2020        PMID: 32190552      PMCID: PMC7063452          DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i2.82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthop        ISSN: 2218-5836


  18 in total

1.  The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales: a comparative analysis with projections for the United States. A study using the National Joint Registry dataset.

Authors:  A Patel; G Pavlou; R E Mújica-Mota; A D Toms
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Fionna Mowat; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Discectomy-related information on the internet: does the quality follow the surge?

Authors:  Yahya Elhassan; Gerard Sheridan; Mujtaba Nassiri; Mugtaba Osman; Pat Kiely; Jacques Noel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Surfing for hip replacements: has the "internet tidal wave" led to better quality information.

Authors:  Mujtaba Nassiri; Robert A Bruce-Brand; Francis O'Neill; Shojaeddin Chenouri; Paul T Curtin
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices.

Authors:  D Charnock; S Shepperd; G Needham; R Gann
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty: Quality of Online Patient Information.

Authors:  Geoff Crozier-Shaw; Joseph M Queally; John F Quinlan
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 1.390

7.  Evaluating online information regarding the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rohith Mohan; Paul H Yi; Erik N Hansen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  A Qualitative and Quantitative Comparative Analysis of Commercial and Independent Online Information for Hip Surgery: A Bias in Online Information Targeting Patients?

Authors:  Martin J Kelly; Iain H Feeley; John M O'Byrne
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Internet and social media usage of orthopaedic patients: A questionnaire-based survey.

Authors:  Tahir Mutlu Duymus; Hilmi Karadeniz; Mehmet Akif Çaçan; Baran Kömür; Abdullah Demirtaş; Sinan Zehir; İbrahim Azboy
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-02-18

Review 10.  Social media use in healthcare: A systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Edin Smailhodzic; Wyanda Hooijsma; Albert Boonstra; David J Langley
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  3 in total

1.  Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.

Authors:  Sean-Tee J M Lim; Martin Kelly; Logeswaran Selvarajah; Michael Murray; Timothy Scanlon
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  Quality and Content of Internet-Based Information for Osteoporosis and Fragility Fracture Diagnoses.

Authors:  Meghan K Wally; Thomas Bemenderfer; R Randall McKnight; Jacob D Gorbaty; Kyle Jeray; Rachel B Seymour; Madhav A Karunakar
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2021-02-12

3.  Comparison of online health information between different digital platforms for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Tanja Hüsch; Sita Ober; Axel Haferkamp; Gert Naumann; Ralf Tunn; Matthias Saar; Jennifer Kranz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.661

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.