Literature DB >> 27874913

Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty: Quality of Online Patient Information.

Geoff Crozier-Shaw, Joseph M Queally, John F Quinlan.   

Abstract

Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (THA) has generated much attention in the media because of early failure of certain implant systems. This study assessed the quality, accuracy, and readability of online information on metal-on-metal THA. The search terms "metal-on-metal hip replacement" and "metal hip replacement" were entered into the 3 most popular search engines. Information quality was assessed with the DISCERN score and a specific metal-on-metal THA content score. Accuracy of information was assessed with a customized score. Readability of the websites was assessed with the Flesch-Kincaid grade level score. A total of 61 unique websites were assessed. For 56% of websites, the target audience was patients. Media or medicolegal sources accounted for 44% of websites. As assessed by DISCERN (range, 16-80) and metal-on-metal THA (range, 0-25) scores, quality of the websites was moderate at best (47.1 and 9.6, respectively). Accuracy (range, 0-8) of the information presented also was moderate, with a mean score of 6.6. Media and medicolegal websites had the lowest scores for both quality and accuracy, despite making up the greatest proportion of sites assessed. Only 1 website (2%) had a Flesch-Kincaid grade level at or less than the recommended level of 8th grade. This study found that online information on metal-on-metal THA was of poor quality, often was inaccurate, and was presented at an inappropriately high reading level, particularly for media and medicolegal websites. Health care providers should counsel patients on the quality of information available and recommend appropriate online resources. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(2):e262-e268.]. Copyright 2016, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27874913     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20161116-02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents.

Authors:  Sarah Mozafarpour; Briony Norris; James Borin; Brian H Eisner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Using Facebook Live to Advocate Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Hilda H Tso; Jay R Parikh
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Revision total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of the quality and readability of information on the internet.

Authors:  Gerard Anthony Sheridan; Carl O'Brien; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2020-02-18

4.  Use of a custom website by orthopaedic sports medicine surgical patients: If you build it, will they come?

Authors:  Sean J Meredith; Paul E Matuszewski; Michael P Smuda; Evin Taskoy; Scott Koenig; Vidushan Nadarajah; Jonathan D Packer; R Frank Henn
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-04-13

Review 5.  A Systematic Assessment of YouTube Content on Femoroacetabular Impingement: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Connor R Crutchfield; Jessie S Frank; Matthew J Anderson; David P Trofa; T Sean Lynch
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.