| Literature DB >> 32190298 |
Andrea G Braundmeier-Fleming1, Cassandra S Skenandore2, Lesly Gil2, Victoria Jacobsen2, Melissa Cregger1, Taylor Badger1, Mallory Karr1, Guoyao Wu3, Stephen B Smith3, Annie E Newell-Fugate2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that supplementation of nursery and grower pig diets with coconut oil in the absence of antibiotics would yield maintenance of glucose homeostasis, growth performance, and immune function similar to what is achieved with nursery and grower pig diets containing antibiotics. Pigs received the same base treatment diets from d24 (weaning) to d71 of age and had blood and fecal samples collected on d24, d31, d45 and d71 for measurement of whole blood glucose, serum insulin, cortisol and cytokines, and fecal microbiome. Pigs had weekly weights and daily feed consumption measured throughout the study. Animals were euthanized at d71 and subcutaneous fat and ileal contents were collected for assessment for fatty acids and microbiome, respectively. Diet treatments consisted of 2% soybean oil plus antibiotics (ABX; n = 22), 2% soybean oil without antibiotics (NABX; n = 22), and 2% coconut oil without antibiotics (COC; n = 22). Statistical analysis examined the effect of diet within each timepoint using a repeated measures ANOVA.Entities:
Keywords: Alternatives; Antibiotic supplementation; Grower pigs; Medium chain fatty acids; Nursery pigs; Oil
Year: 2020 PMID: 32190298 PMCID: PMC7075000 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-020-0428-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Biotechnol ISSN: 1674-9782
Growth parameters for pigs by age and diet treatmentab
| Age, d | ABX | COC | NABX | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADFI | ADG | FCR | WTG | ADFI | ADG | FCR | WTG | ADFI | ADG | FCR | WTG | |
| 31 | 0.27 ± 0.02* | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 2.42 ± 0.52# | 0.90 ± 0.30 | 0.22 ± 0.02* | 0.12 ± 0.04 | 2.44 ± 0.54# | 0.81 ± 0.30 | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 3.36 ± 0.56# | 0.79 ± 0.31 |
| 38 | 0.45 ± 0.02 | 0.32 ± 0.04 | 1.56 ± 0.52# | 2.26 ± 0.30& | 0.43 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.04 | 2.34 ± 0.53 | 1.86 ± 0.30& | 0.47 ± 0.02 | 0.29 ± 0.04 | 2.12 ± 0.5 | 2.06 ± 0.31 |
| 45 | 0.83 ± 0.02 | 0.52 ± 0.04 | 1.67 ± 0.52 | 3.61 ± 0.30 | 0.80 ± 0.02 | 0.44 ± 0.04 | 1.94 ± 0.53 | 3.07 ± 0.30 | 0.78 ± 0.02 | 0.47 ± 0.04 | 1.95 ± 0.54 | 3.30 ± 0.31 |
| 52 | 0.73 ± 0.02 | 0.64 ± 0.04 | 1.03 ± 0.52 | 4.51 ± 0.30 | 0.70 ± 0.02 | 0.64 ± 0.04 | 1.02 ± 0.53 | 4.46 ± 0.30 | 0.75 ± 0.02 | 0.62 ± 0.04 | 1.10 ± 0.54 | 4.31 ± 0.31 |
| 59 | 0.65 ± 0.02 | 0.80 ± 0.04 | 0.84 ± 0.52 | 5.58 ± 0.30 | 0.65 ± 0.02 | 0.75 ± 0.04 | 0.88 ± 0.53 | 5.23 ± 0.30 | 0.66 ± 0.02 | 0.74 ± 0.04 | 0.92 ± 0.54 | 5.15 ± 0.31 |
| 66 | 0.67 ± 0.02 | 0.60 ± 0.04 | 0.74 ± 0.52 | 4.19 ± 0.30 | 0.64 ± 0.02 | 0.59 ± 0.04 | 0.74 ± 0.53 | 4.11 ± 0.30 | 0.64 ± 0.02 | 0.51 ± 0.04 | 0.77 ± 0.54 | 3.54 ± 0.31 |
aABX: 2% soybean oil with antibiotics; COC: 2% coconut oil without antibiotics; NABX: 2% soybean oil without antibiotics
bAnimal and feed weights used for calculations are in kilograms
ADFI Average daily food intake (kg feed), ADG Average daily gain (kg weight), FCR Feed conversion ratio, WTG Weight gain (kg)/pig/week
* Within ADFI (column) and age (row), values are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05)
# Within FCR (column) and age (row), values are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05)
& Within WTG (column) and age (row), values are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05)
Percentage of fatty acid acids in subcutaneous adipose tissue by diet treatment1
| Common name | Formula | ABX | COC | NABX | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lauric | 12:0 | 0.05 ± 0.03a | 1.37 ± 0.03b | 0.03 ± 0.03a | < 0.001 |
| Myristic | 14:0 | 1.46 ± 0.09a | 4.66 ± 0.09b | 1.29 ± 0.03a | < 0.001 |
| Myristoleic | 14:1 | 0.02 ± 0.01a | 0.10 ± 0.01b | 0.005 ± 0.01a | < 0.001 |
| Palmitic | 16:0 | 22.51 ± 0.24a | 25.92 ± 0.24b | 22.53 ± 0.24a | < 0.001 |
| Palmitoleic | 16:1 | 2.54 ± 0.12a | 3.68 ± 0.12b | 2.43 ± 0.12a | < 0.001 |
| Stearic | 18:0 | 11.21 ± 0.30a | 11.66 ± 0.30a | 11.06 ± 0.30a | 0.71 |
| Oleic | 18:1n-9 | 31.57 ± 0.47a | 32.65 ± 0.47a* | 31.45 ± 0.45a* | 0.07 |
| 18:1n-7 | 2.40 ± 0.08a | 2.86 ± 0.08b | 2.25 ± 0.08a | < 0.001 | |
| Linoleic | 18:2n-6 | 23.60 ± 0.43a | 14.59 ± 0.42b | 24.54 ± 0.41a | < 0.001 |
| 18:3n-3 | 2.26 ± 0.06a | 0.96 ± 0.06b | 2.20 ± 0.06a | < 0.001 | |
| Arachidic | 20:0 | 0.23 ± 0.01a | 0.20 ± 0.01a | 0.20 ± 0.01a | 0.54 |
| Paulinic | 20:1n-11 | 0.51 ± 0.03a | 0.42 ± 0.03a | 0.48 ± 0.03a | 0.48 |
| Eicosadienoic | 20:2n-6 | 0.82 ± 0.03a | 0.37 ± 0.03b | 0.76 ± 0.03a | < 0.001 |
| Arachidonic | 20:4n-6 | 0.45 ± 0.01a | 0.38 ± 0.01b | 0.44 ± 0.01a | 0.01 |
| Mead | 20:3n-6 | 0.24 ± 0.01a | 0.11 ± 0.01b | 0.23 ± 0.01a | < 0.001 |
| Docosahexaenoic | 22:6n-3 | 0.11 ± 0.01a | 0.08 ± 0.01b | 0.10 ± 0.01a | 0.01 |
1ABX: 2% soybean oil with antibiotics; COC: 2% coconut oil without antibiotics; NABX: 2% soybean oil without antibiotics
ab Within rows, values with common superscripts are not different (P > 0.05)
* Within rows, values with asterisks tend to be different (P ≤ 0.10)
Fig. 1Effect of diet treatment on whole blood glucose and serum insulin. a Glucose levels in each diet treatment group (ABX, COC, and NABX) over time. b Change in glucose levels in response to diet over time. c Insulin levels in each diet treatment group (ABX, COC, and NABX) over time. d Change in insulin levels in response to diet over time. Values for the change in glucose or insulin were normalized to individual animal baseline (d24) measurements and then averaged across treatment groups for each age (d31, d45, d71). Within diet treatment but between age, points or bars with different lowercase letters have significant differences between ages within a diet treatment (P ≤ 0.05). Within age but between diet treatment, brackets with: * denotes significant differences between diet treatments at P ≤ 0.05; ** denotes significant differences between diet treatments at P ≤ 0.01
Fig. 2Effect of diet treatment on serum cortisol. a Cortisol levels in each diet treatment group ABX, COC, and NABX) over time. b Change in cortisol levels in response to diet over time. Values for the change in glucose or insulin were normalized to individual animal baseline (d24) measurements and then averaged across treatment groups for each age (d31, d45, d71). Within diet treatment but between age, points or bars with different lowercase letters denote significant differences between ages (P < 0.05) and bars with different uppercase letters denote a trend toward significant differences between ages (0.05 < P < 0.10)
Fig. 3Effect of diet treatment on serum cytokines. a Interleukin 1β b Interleukin 8 c Interleukin 10 and d Interleukin-4 levels were measured. Within diet treatment but between age, points or bars with different lowercase letters denote significant differences between ages but within diet treatment (P ≤ 0.05). Within age but between diet treatment, brackets with: # denotes a trend for a significant difference between diet treatment (0.05 < P ≤ 0.10); * denotes significant differences between diet treatments at P ≤ 0.05; *** denotes significant differences between diet treatments at P ≤ 0.001
Fig. 4Principal component analysis (non-dimensional scaling) on microbial sequences from NGS. 3D clustering patterns of individual animals within each diet treatment by age. Black (ABX), grey (NABX) and white (COC) denote diet treatment. a d24 of age. b d31 of age. c d45 of age. d d71 of age. Spatial proximity of each dot indicates the similarity of one individual’s microbial communities to another individual’s microbial communities. The closer dots are the more similar samples are and the farther dots are the less similar samples are
Fig. 5Effect of diet treatment on fecal and ileal microbial community dynamics. Principal component analysis of fecal and ileal samples was performed. a Combined analysis of samples collected by age. b Analysis of fecal and ileal sample microbial dynamics at d71 of age
Differentially expressed bacterial OTU copy number in fecal samples by diet treatment1
| ABX | COC | NABX | Bacterial taxonomy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 389a | 887b | 404a | 0.04 | Bacteroidetes; Bacteroidia; Prevotellaceae; |
| 153a | 293b | 227ab | 0.02 | Bacteroidetes; Bacteroidia; Bacteroidales; Bacteroidales S24–7 |
| 46a | 216b | 89a | 0.01 | Firmicutes; Clostridia; Clostridiales; Lachnospiraceae; |
| 15a | 201b | 125b | 0.01 | Firmicutes; Clostridia; Clostridiales; Peptostreptococcaceae; |
| 1a | 23b | 12ab | 0.01 | Firmicutes; Erysipelotrichia; Erysipelotrichales; Erysipelotrichaceae; |
| 1a | 18ab | 53b | 0.02 | Bacteroidetes; Bacteroidia; Bacteroidales; Porphyromonadaceae; |
| 2a | 12b | 4ab | 0.03 | Firmicutes; Clostridia; Clostridiales; Lachnospiraceae |
| 3a | 0.81b | 0.8b | 0.03 | Bacteroidetes; Bacterodidia; Bacteroidales; Prevotellaceae; |
| 3.7a | 0.53b | 0.92b | 0.03 | Firmicutes; Clostridia; Clostridailaes; Lachnospiraceae; |
1ABX: 2% soybean oil with antibiotics; COC: 2% coconut oil without antibiotics; NABX: 2% soybean oil without antibiotics; OTU: average over all ages is shown for each diet treatment
ab Within rows, values with common superscripts are not different (P > 0.05)