Literature DB >> 32188954

Intensive farming drives long-term shifts in avian community composition.

J Nicholas Hendershot1,2, Jeffrey R Smith3,4, Christopher B Anderson3,4, Andrew D Letten3,5,6, Luke O Frishkoff7, Jim R Zook8, Tadashi Fukami3, Gretchen C Daily3,4,9,10.   

Abstract

Agricultural practices constitute both the greatest cause of biodiversity loss and the greatest opportunity for conservation1,2, given the shrinking scope of protected areas in many regions. Recent studies have documented the high levels of biodiversity-across many taxa and biomes-that agricultural landscapes can support over the short term1,3,4. However, little is known about the long-term effects of alternative agricultural practices on ecological communities4,5 Here we document changes in bird communities in intensive-agriculture, diversified-agriculture and natural-forest habitats in 4 regions of Costa Rica over a period of 18 years. Long-term directional shifts in bird communities were evident in intensive- and diversified-agricultural habitats, but were strongest in intensive-agricultural habitats, where the number of endemic and International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List species fell over time. All major guilds, including those involved in pest control, pollination and seed dispersal, were affected. Bird communities in intensive-agricultural habitats proved more susceptible to changes in climate, with hotter and drier periods associated with greater changes in community composition in these settings. These findings demonstrate that diversified agriculture can help to alleviate the long-term loss of biodiversity outside natural protected areas1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32188954     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2090-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  26 in total

1.  Resilience and stability in bird guilds across tropical countryside.

Authors:  Daniel S Karp; Guy Ziv; Jim Zook; Paul R Ehrlich; Gretchen C Daily
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Reframing the land-sparing/land-sharing debate for biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  Claire Kremen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity.

Authors:  Tim Newbold; Lawrence N Hudson; Samantha L L Hill; Sara Contu; Igor Lysenko; Rebecca A Senior; Luca Börger; Dominic J Bennett; Argyrios Choimes; Ben Collen; Julie Day; Adriana De Palma; Sandra Díaz; Susy Echeverria-Londoño; Melanie J Edgar; Anat Feldman; Morgan Garon; Michelle L K Harrison; Tamera Alhusseini; Daniel J Ingram; Yuval Itescu; Jens Kattge; Victoria Kemp; Lucinda Kirkpatrick; Michael Kleyer; David Laginha Pinto Correia; Callum D Martin; Shai Meiri; Maria Novosolov; Yuan Pan; Helen R P Phillips; Drew W Purves; Alexandra Robinson; Jake Simpson; Sean L Tuck; Evan Weiher; Hannah J White; Robert M Ewers; Georgina M Mace; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Quantifying and sustaining biodiversity in tropical agricultural landscapes.

Authors:  Chase D Mendenhall; Analisa Shields-Estrada; Arjun J Krishnaswami; Gretchen C Daily
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits.

Authors:  Marco Springmann; Michael Clark; Daniel Mason-D'Croz; Keith Wiebe; Benjamin Leon Bodirsky; Luis Lassaletta; Wim de Vries; Sonja J Vermeulen; Mario Herrero; Kimberly M Carlson; Malin Jonell; Max Troell; Fabrice DeClerck; Line J Gordon; Rami Zurayk; Peter Scarborough; Mike Rayner; Brent Loken; Jess Fanzo; H Charles J Godfray; David Tilman; Johan Rockström; Walter Willett
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people.

Authors:  C Kremen; A M Merenlender
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Loss of avian phylogenetic diversity in neotropical agricultural systems.

Authors:  Luke O Frishkoff; Daniel S Karp; Leithen K M'Gonigle; Chase D Mendenhall; Jim Zook; Claire Kremen; Elizabeth A Hadly; Gretchen C Daily
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Biodiversity at risk under future cropland expansion and intensification.

Authors:  Laura Kehoe; Alfredo Romero-Muñoz; Ester Polaina; Lyndon Estes; Holger Kreft; Tobias Kuemmerle
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 15.460

9.  Forest bolsters bird abundance, pest control and coffee yield.

Authors:  Daniel S Karp; Chase D Mendenhall; Randi Figueroa Sandí; Nicolas Chaumont; Paul R Ehrlich; Elizabeth A Hadly; Gretchen C Daily
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  The biomass distribution on Earth.

Authors:  Yinon M Bar-On; Rob Phillips; Ron Milo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  8 in total

1.  Agricultural intensification and climate change are rapidly decreasing insect biodiversity.

Authors:  Peter H Raven; David L Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Human-modified landscapes narrow the isotopic niche of neotropical birds.

Authors:  Ana Beatriz Navarro; Marcelo Magioli; Juliano André Bogoni; Marcelo Zacharias Moreira; Luís Fábio Silveira; Eduardo Roberto Alexandrino; Daniela Tomasio Apolinario da Luz; Marco Aurelio Pizo; Wesley Rodrigues Silva; Vanessa Cristina de Oliveira; Reginaldo José Donatelli; Alexander V Christianini; Augusto João Piratelli; Katia Maria Paschoaletto Micchi Barros Ferraz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Agriculture and climate change are reshaping insect biodiversity worldwide.

Authors:  Charlotte L Outhwaite; Peter McCann; Tim Newbold
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Long-term monitoring reveals widespread and severe declines of understory birds in a protected Neotropical forest.

Authors:  Henry S Pollock; Judith D Toms; Corey E Tarwater; Thomas J Benson; James R Karr; Jeffrey D Brawn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Quantitative selection of focal birds and mammals in higher-tier risk assessment: An application to rice cultivations.

Authors:  Valerio Orioli; Alessandra Caffi; Flavio Marchetto; Olivia Dondina; Luciano Bani
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Effects of density, species interactions, and environmental stochasticity on the dynamics of British bird communities.

Authors:  Lisa Sandal; Vidar Grøtan; Bernt-Erik Saether; Robert P Freckleton; David G Noble; Otso Ovaskainen
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2022-06-19       Impact factor: 6.431

7.  Multi-community effects of organic and conventional farming practices in vineyards.

Authors:  Noémie Ostandie; Brice Giffard; Olivier Bonnard; Benjamin Joubard; Sylvie Richart-Cervera; Denis Thiéry; Adrien Rusch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Ethnobotanical study on wild edible plants used by three trans-boundary ethnic groups in Jiangcheng County, Pu'er, Southwest China.

Authors:  Yilin Cao; Ren Li; Shishun Zhou; Liang Song; Ruichang Quan; Huabin Hu
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.733

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.