Literature DB >> 32188688

Expanding Access to Biospecimens for Lyme Disease Test Development.

John L Schmitz1.   

Abstract

The laboratory diagnosis of Lyme disease relies upon serologic testing. A standard or modified two-tiered testing algorithm is used to enhance the accuracy of antibody detection. However, this approach suffers from a lack of sensitivity in early Lyme disease. Ongoing efforts to develop more sensitive antibody detection technologies and other diagnostic approaches are dependent upon the availability of quality-assured biospecimens linked to reliable clinical data. In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Horn et al. (E. J. Horn, G. Dempsey, A. M. Schotthoefer, U. L. Prisco, et al., J Clin Microbiol 58:e00032-20, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00032-20) described the development of the Lyme Disease Biobank. Clinically categorized case patients with early Lyme disease and healthy controls were identified (without laboratory diagnostic testing) from three sites where Lyme disease is endemic. Subjects provided whole blood and urine, which were processed and stored at a central biorepository. Whole blood, serum, and urine aliquots were prepared and are available to investigators developing laboratory diagnostics for Lyme disease. After obtaining samples, extensive laboratory testing was performed, including serologic and nucleic acid amplification testing for B. burgdorferi and other tick-borne pathogens. Direct detection methods yielded few positive results. Relative to the findings for another commonly used biorepository cohort, the results of this testing demonstrated a low seropositive rate, as determined by standard two-tiered testing. Additionally, relatively few subjects demonstrated seroconversion with testing of convalescent-phase samples. This clinical and serologically defined cohort of samples from Lyme disease and control cases from areas of Lyme disease endemicity offers an additional valuable resource for novel test development that includes alternate specimen types.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Borrelia burgdorferizzm321990; Lyme disease; biospecimen; diagnosis; immunoserology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32188688      PMCID: PMC7269380          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00449-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  22 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Modified Two-Tiered Testing Method for Diagnosis of Lyme Disease in Children.

Authors:  Susan C Lipsett; John A Branda; Lise E Nigrovic
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of Modified 2-Tiered Serodiagnostic Testing Algorithms for Early Lyme Disease.

Authors:  John A Branda; Klemen Strle; Lise E Nigrovic; Paul M Lantos; Timothy J Lepore; Nitin S Damle; Mary Jane Ferraro; Allen C Steere
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Collection and characterization of samples for establishment of a serum repository for lyme disease diagnostic test development and evaluation.

Authors:  Claudia R Molins; Christopher Sexton; John W Young; Laura V Ashton; Ryan Pappert; Charles B Beard; Martin E Schriefer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Advances in Serodiagnostic Testing for Lyme Disease Are at Hand.

Authors:  John A Branda; Barbara A Body; Jeff Boyle; Bernard M Branson; Raymond J Dattwyler; Erol Fikrig; Noel J Gerald; Maria Gomes-Solecki; Martin Kintrup; Michel Ledizet; Andrew E Levin; Michael Lewinski; Lance A Liotta; Adriana Marques; Paul S Mead; Emmanuel F Mongodin; Segaran Pillai; Prasad Rao; William H Robinson; Kristian M Roth; Martin E Schriefer; Thomas Slezak; Jessica Snyder; Allen C Steere; Jan Witkowski; Susan J Wong; Steven E Schutzer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Evolution of the serologic response to Borrelia burgdorferi in treated patients with culture-confirmed erythema migrans.

Authors:  M E Aguero-Rosenfeld; J Nowakowski; S Bittker; D Cooper; R B Nadelman; G P Wormser
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Single-tier testing with the C6 peptide ELISA kit compared with two-tier testing for Lyme disease.

Authors:  Gary P Wormser; Martin Schriefer; Maria E Aguero-Rosenfeld; Andrew Levin; Allen C Steere; Robert B Nadelman; John Nowakowski; Adriana Marques; Barbara J B Johnson; J Stephen Dumler
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.803

7.  The Lyme Disease Biobank: Characterization of 550 Patient and Control Samples from the East Coast and Upper Midwest of the United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Horn; George Dempsey; Anna M Schotthoefer; U Lena Prisco; Matthew McArdle; Stephanie S Gervasi; Marc Golightly; Cathy De Luca; Mel Evans; Bobbi S Pritt; Elitza S Theel; Radha Iyer; Dionysios Liveris; Guiqing Wang; Don Goldstein; Ira Schwartz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Updated CDC Recommendation for Serologic Diagnosis of Lyme Disease.

Authors:  Paul Mead; Jeannine Petersen; Alison Hinckley
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  Notes from the Field: Four Cases of Lyme Disease at an Outdoor Wilderness Camp - North Carolina, 2017 and 2019.

Authors:  Alexis M Barbarin; Steven W Seagle; Susan Creede
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 17.586

10.  Serodiagnosis of Lyme disease by kinetic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using recombinant VlsE1 or peptide antigens of Borrelia burgdorferi compared with 2-tiered testing using whole-cell lysates.

Authors:  Rendi Murphree Bacon; Brad J Biggerstaff; Martin E Schriefer; Robert D Gilmore; Mario T Philipp; Allen C Steere; Gary P Wormser; Adriana R Marques; Barbara J B Johnson
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 5.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.