| Literature DB >> 29228208 |
John A Branda1, Barbara A Body2, Jeff Boyle3, Bernard M Branson4, Raymond J Dattwyler5, Erol Fikrig6, Noel J Gerald7, Maria Gomes-Solecki8, Martin Kintrup9, Michel Ledizet10, Andrew E Levin11, Michael Lewinski12, Lance A Liotta13, Adriana Marques14, Paul S Mead15, Emmanuel F Mongodin16, Segaran Pillai17, Prasad Rao7, William H Robinson18, Kristian M Roth7, Martin E Schriefer15, Thomas Slezak19, Jessica Snyder20, Allen C Steere21, Jan Witkowski22, Susan J Wong23, Steven E Schutzer24.
Abstract
The cause of Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi, was discovered in 1983. A 2-tiered testing protocol was established for serodiagnosis in 1994, involving an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or indirect fluorescence antibody, followed (if reactive) by immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G Western immunoblots. These assays were prepared from whole-cell cultured B. burgdorferi, lacking key in vivo expressed antigens and expressing antigens that can bind non-Borrelia antibodies. Additional drawbacks, particular to the Western immunoblot component, include low sensitivity in early infection, technical complexity, and subjective interpretation when scored by visual examination. Nevertheless, 2-tiered testing with immunoblotting remains the benchmark for evaluation of new methods or approaches. Next-generation serologic assays, prepared with recombinant proteins or synthetic peptides, and alternative testing protocols, can now overcome or circumvent many of these past drawbacks. This article describes next-generation serodiagnostic testing for Lyme disease, focusing on methods that are currently available or near-at-hand.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29228208 PMCID: PMC6019075 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix943
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Infect Dis ISSN: 1058-4838 Impact factor: 9.079