Literature DB >> 31415492

Updated CDC Recommendation for Serologic Diagnosis of Lyme Disease.

Paul Mead1, Jeannine Petersen1, Alison Hinckley1.   

Abstract

Lyme disease is a tickborne zoonosis for which serologic testing is the principal means of laboratory diagnosis. In 1994, the Association of State and Territorial Public Health Laboratory Directors, CDC, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, and the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards convened the Second National Conference on Serologic Diagnosis of Lyme Disease (1).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31415492      PMCID: PMC6818702          DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6832a4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


Lyme disease is a tickborne zoonosis for which serologic testing is the principal means of laboratory diagnosis. In 1994, the Association of State and Territorial Public Health Laboratory Directors, CDC, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, and the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards convened the Second National Conference on Serologic Diagnosis of Lyme Disease (). The conference proceedings recommended a two-test methodology using a sensitive enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or immunofluorescence assay as a first test, followed by a western immunoblot assay for specimens yielding positive or equivocal results (,). Regarding the development of future tests, the report advised that evaluation of new serologic assays include blind testing against a comprehensive challenge panel, and that new assays should only be recommended if their specificity, sensitivity, and precision equaled or surpassed the performance of tests used in the recommended two-test procedure. To assist serologic test developers, CDC has made available, with support from NIH, a comprehensive panel of sera from patients with various stages of Lyme disease and other conditions, as well as healthy persons (). On July 29, 2019, FDA cleared several Lyme disease serologic assays with new indications for use based on a modified two-test methodology (). The modified methodology uses a second EIA in place of a western immunoblot assay. Clearance by FDA of the new Lyme disease assays indicates that test performance has been evaluated and is “substantially equivalent to or better than” a legally marketed predicate test.

Recommendation

When cleared by FDA for this purpose, serologic assays that utilize EIA rather than western immunoblot assay in a two-test format are acceptable alternatives for the laboratory diagnosis of Lyme disease. Based on the criteria established at the 1994 Second National Conference on Serologic Diagnosis of Lyme Disease, clinicians and laboratories should consider serologic tests cleared by FDA as CDC-recommended procedures for Lyme disease serodiagnosis.

What is already known about this topic?

Serologic testing is the principal means of laboratory diagnosis of Lyme disease. Current recommendations include using a sensitive enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or immunofluorescence assay, followed by a western immunoblot assay for specimens yielding positive or equivocal results.

What is added by this report?

On July 29, 2019, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cleared several Lyme disease serologic assays with new indications for use, allowing for an EIA rather than western immunoblot assay as the second test in a Lyme disease testing algorithm.

What are the indications for public health practice?

When cleared by FDA for this purpose, serologic assays that utilize a second EIA in place of western immunoblot assay are acceptable alternatives for the serologic diagnosis of Lyme disease.
  2 in total

1.  Collection and characterization of samples for establishment of a serum repository for lyme disease diagnostic test development and evaluation.

Authors:  Claudia R Molins; Christopher Sexton; John W Young; Laura V Ashton; Ryan Pappert; Charles B Beard; Martin E Schriefer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Recommendations for test performance and interpretation from the Second National Conference on Serologic Diagnosis of Lyme Disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1995-08-11       Impact factor: 17.586

  2 in total
  32 in total

1.  Performance of a Modified Two-Tiered Testing Enzyme Immunoassay Algorithm for Serologic Diagnosis of Lyme Disease in Nova Scotia.

Authors:  Ian R C Davis; Shelly A McNeil; Wanda Allen; Donna MacKinnon-Cameron; L Robbin Lindsay; Katarina Bernat; Antonia Dibernardo; Jason J LeBlanc; Todd F Hatchette
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the Modified Two-Tiered Testing Method for Diagnosis of Lyme Disease in Children.

Authors:  Susan C Lipsett; John A Branda; Lise E Nigrovic
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  An Update to a Review of Guidelines for the Clinical Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease.

Authors:  Caterina M Miraglia
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2020-12-15

4.  Expanding Access to Biospecimens for Lyme Disease Test Development.

Authors:  John L Schmitz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  A Multiplexed Serologic Test for Diagnosis of Lyme Disease for Point-of-Care Use.

Authors:  Siddarth Arumugam; Samiksha Nayak; Taylor Williams; Francesco Serra di Santa Maria; Mariana Soares Guedes; Rodrigo Cotrim Chaves; Vincent Linder; Adriana R Marques; Elizabeth J Horn; Susan J Wong; Samuel K Sia; Maria Gomes-Solecki
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Occupational Lyme Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nicola Magnavita; Ilaria Capitanelli; Olayinka Ilesanmi; Francesco Chirico
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-25

Review 7.  Lyme Disease Frontiers: Reconciling Borrelia Biology and Clinical Conundrums.

Authors:  Vladimir V Bamm; Jordan T Ko; Iain L Mainprize; Victoria P Sanderson; Melanie K B Wills
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2019-12-16

Review 8.  Modified two-tiered testing algorithm for Lyme disease serology: the Canadian context.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2020-05-07

Review 9.  Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis.

Authors:  John A Branda; Allen C Steere
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Detection of IFN-γ Secretion in Blood Samples Collected Before and After Treatment of Varying Stages of Lyme Disease.

Authors:  Paul M Arnaboldi; Christina D'Arco; Yosefa Hefter; Sheila Nolan; Dean A Jobe; Steven M Callister; Raymond J Dattwyler
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 20.999

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.