Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most lethal cancers, with frequent local therapy resistance and dismal 5-year survival rate. To date, surgical resection remains to be the only treatment option offering potential cure. Unfortunately, at diagnosis, the majority of patients demonstrate varying levels of vascular infiltration, which can contraindicate surgical resection. Patients unsuitable for immediate resection are further divided into locally advanced (LA) and borderline resectable (BR), with different treatment goals and therapeutic designs. Accurate definition of resectability is thus critical for PC patients, yet the existing methods to determine resectability rely on descriptive abutment to surrounding vessels rather than quantitative geometric characterization. Here, we aim to introduce a novel intra-subject object-space support-vector-machine (OsSVM) method to quantitatively characterize the degree of vascular involvement-the main factor determining the PC resectability. Intra-subject OsSVMs were applied on 107 contrast CT scans (56 LA, BR and 26 resectable (RE) PC cases) for optimized tumor-vessel separations. Nine metrics derived from OsSVM margins were calculated as indicators of the overall vascular infiltration. The combined sets of matrics selected by the elastic net yielded high classification capability between LA and BR (AUC = 0.95), as well as BR and RE (AUC = 0.98). The proposed OsSVM method may provide an improved quantitative imaging guideline to refine the PC resectability grading system.
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most lethal cancers, with frequent local therapy resistance and dismal 5-year survival rate. To date, surgical resection remains to be the only treatment option offering potential cure. Unfortunately, at diagnosis, the majority of patients demonstrate varying levels of vascular infiltration, which can contraindicate surgical resection. Patients unsuitable for immediate resection are further divided into locally advanced (LA) and borderline resectable (BR), with different treatment goals and therapeutic designs. Accurate definition of resectability is thus critical for PCpatients, yet the existing methods to determine resectability rely on descriptive abutment to surrounding vessels rather than quantitative geometric characterization. Here, we aim to introduce a novel intra-subject object-space support-vector-machine (OsSVM) method to quantitatively characterize the degree of vascular involvement-the main factor determining the PC resectability. Intra-subject OsSVMs were applied on 107 contrast CT scans (56 LA, BR and 26 resectable (RE) PC cases) for optimized tumor-vessel separations. Nine metrics derived from OsSVM margins were calculated as indicators of the overall vascular infiltration. The combined sets of matrics selected by the elastic net yielded high classification capability between LA and BR (AUC = 0.95), as well as BR and RE (AUC = 0.98). The proposed OsSVM method may provide an improved quantitative imaging guideline to refine the PC resectability grading system.
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most malignant cancers, with a
collective median survival of 4–6 months and a 5-year survival rate as low as
5% [1, 2]. Currently, surgical resection remains to be the only potentially curable
treatment, which increases the 5-year survival rate to 12–20%, compared to
<1% for unresectable cases [3].
However, at the time of diagnosis, only an estimated 10% - 20% of patients present
with resectable disease. The majority of patients demonstrate varying levels of
vascular infiltration, which can contraindicate surgical resection. Patients with
tumor vasculature infiltration are further classified into borderline resectable
(BR) and locally advanced (LA) PC, which are subject to different treatment goals
and therapeutical regimens. As a result, differentiating patients with surgical
potential from those with unresectable diseases is of paramount importance in
patient management. However, there is a scarcity of standardized criteria for
defining resectability.The ambivalence in the existing clinical definition of resectability is in
part attributed to the lack of consensus over multiple radiologic grading systems.
The criteria of resectability have been evolving with the advances of surgical
techniques. Tumors once considered locally advanced may now have surgical potential.
For instance, any degree of involvement from superior mesenteric vein/ portal vein
(SMV/PV) would have precluded the tumor from resection using criteria from decades
ago [4], while the newer National
Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and Alliance guidelines consider SMV/PV
involvement up to 180° for surgical resection [5, 6]. Moreover, since the concept
of resectability implies a subjective consensus between a specific surgeon and a
radiologist, substantial inter-institutional variability exists [5].The coarsely descriptive guideline in current radiologic grading systems is
another barrier to implement standardized resectability definition [7, 8]. Current PC
resectability definition categorized abutment of vessels derived from
contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CT). Targeting at only a few major
vessels, such as PV, SMV, SMA (superior mesenteric artery), the crude criteria are
unable to assess the overall vascular involvement and the wide spectrum of patients
from deemed unresectable to resectable. As illustrated in Figure 1, while current criteria based on axial views (top
row) have roughly divided the left 5 subjects as 3 LA and 2 BR, 3D renderings
(middle row) show different levels of vascular involvement within each diagnostic
group. In addition, the current classification of the vessel abutment
(e.g.<180°, ≥180°) complicates the interpretation of
patients falling into the categorical boundaries, thus is prone to inter-observer
variabilities. Furthermore, for response assessment, there are large gaps between
resectable (RE), BR and LA using current criteria, resulting in insensitive
detection of tumor partial responses (i.e. tumors partially regressed, albeit failed
to be downgraded below the BR/RE threshold). Therefore, to develop an objective
grading system of resectability that is sensitive to the subtle variation of disease
status, a quantitative measurement of vascular involvement is clearly needed.
Figure 1:
Examples of patients with varying degrees of resectability and their
corresponding resectability quantifications Pvi. The
upper and middle rows show the axial views of the tumor vessel relationship
(tumor, artery, and vein are marked in red, green and blue, respectively) and
the corresponding 3D renderings of tumor (transparent blue) and vessels
(transparent pink). The inter-subject differences spanning the wide spectrum
from LA to RE had been quantitatively interpreted by Pvi shown in the bottom
row. Note: the main vascular involvement presented in these subjects are
arteries, thus veins were excluded in the 3D shape representation to yield
better visualizations.
In this study, we introduce a novel organ-space support vector machine
(OsSVM) based method for PC resectability evaluation on contrast-CT. Our aim is
two-fold: first, to quantitatively characterize the tumor-vessel relationship using
intra-subject OsSVM derived metrics; second, to validate the feasibility of using
the derived metrics to classify PC groups with varying resectability (LA, BR, and
RE).
Methods
Subjects and Data
Under Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, 92 PCpatients aged
31–90 years (mean: 65.4, std:11.6) were retrospectively solicited from
our institutional database between 2011 to 2018. The CT imaging analysis was
carried out in accordance with the minimal risk policy defined by the IRB. The
selection criteria are as follows: 1) having undergone diagnostic contrast CT
scan at our facility; 2) clinical diagnosis of resectability (LA, BR or RE). 3)
RE patients underwent margin-negative resection. Fifteen of the 92 patients with
the initially unresectable disease were downstaged to RE after neoadjuvant
treatment. They were then treated as independent subjects in this analysis,
increasing the total of PC cases to 107 (56 LA, 25 BR, and 26 RE). Each patient
underwent an abdominal contrast CT scan with 100 cc iodixanol, 350mg I/ml
contrast injection. Multiple CT scanners were used including Optima 580, HiSpeed
NX/i, LightSpeed VCT (General Electric HealthCare, Massachusetts, U.S.); and
Gemini (Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Hepatic phase scans were
obtained approximately 60 seconds after the contrast agent injection. Most of
the CT images have spatial resolution of 1.26mm × 1.26mm × 2.5mm,
with pixel spacing ranging from 1–1.26 mm and slice thickness ranging
from 2.5–5 mm. Quality assurance was routinely performed on all CT
scanners to maintain consistent inter-scanner calibration through time.
Data preprocessing
The processing pipeline is illustrated in Figure 2. On the contrast CT, tumor boundaries and surrounding
vessels were manually delineated by a radiation oncologist (>5 years of
experience). Vessels were segmented mainly on axial slices spanning the tumor
superior-inferior extension, with 10 mm margin on both ends. The intra-rater
reliability (intersection over union) score was 0.89 for tumor and 0.93 for
vessels, among four participants at two different time points spanning eight
weeks.
Figure 2:
Illustration of the pipeline quantifying vascular invasion using
nonlinear OsSVM. (a) On contrast-CT images, the tumor and vessels are manually
segmented and processed to create the intra-subject VOI. Tumor, artery, and vein
are color-coded by red, green and blue, respectively. (b) A hyperplane is
defined in VOI using OsSVM. (c) Support vectors from OsSVM are selected as
critical points fed into the following analysis. (d) Classification confidence
measurements (margins) are calculated for the critical points corresponding to
the class vessel and used as indicators of vascular invasion.
Points with margin value located in the blue area correspond to points with low
classification confidence (critical points). (e) Metrics are developed based on
the spatial distribution of margins (upper) and margin-histograms (bottom).
Segmentation of tumors and surrounding vessels were converted to the
individual-wise volume of interest (VOI). To reduce the inter-subject variation,
VOIs were first resampled to the same dimension
(1×1×1mm) and then transformed to the
corresponding center of mass. A bounding box extending 10mm
outside the tumor boundaries was further applied to include vessels that
adjacent to the tumor. The harmonized VOIs were used to build statistical
tumor-vessel relationship models in the following steps.
Hyperplane and critical points
A radial basis function (RBF) kernel SVM classifier [9, 10] was
used to define the intricate tumor-vessel relationship by separating the two
structures according to their anatomical locations. Specifically, with points
x in the VOI and the
corresponding class y (1 for
tumor, −1 for the vessel), we aim to find the decision surface that
separates the two structures with the maximized margin. The decision surface is
termed a hyperplane in SVM. To find the optimal hyperplane, it is
computationally efficient to solve for the Lagrangian dual formation with the
constraints such that: where K is an RBF kernel (with kernel scale
γ) that transforms the linearly inseparable data into a higher
dimensional space, C is a box constraint which trades off the
fit of solutions with the simplicity of the hyperplane. The non-zero Lagrange
multipliers (α) from the optimizing process play a critical role in
determining the location of the hyperplane and correspond to the support
vectors.Different from traditional SVM analysis that seeks a single model for
the whole patient cohort, here we aim to build a patient-specific model and then
compare the levels of misclassification among different PC groups. Same
hyper-parameter settings were used for individual patient models to afford fair
inter-subject comparisons. Using randomly selected 10 RE cases as a test set,
γ = 4 and C=10 were set to achieve a reasonable runtime
and low misclassification rate in the RE cases (Figure 3).
Figure 3:
Illustration of the selection criteria of hyperparameters kernel scale
(γ) and box constraint (C). A combination of γ =
4 and C = 10 resulted in a minimal of weighted R0
classification loss (misclassification rate) and runtime (s).
Margins of critical points
Resectability is analogous to the separability between the class
tumor and the class vessel, which can be
determined by the margins of the critical points (support vectors). The
classification margin, a confidence measure of the separation, is defined as:
where x is an
observation, y ∊
{−1, 1} is the corresponding true label, and
f(x) is the
predicted score from the above SVM model. A larger m value
represents a higher classification confidence of the observation. The magnitude
and distribution of m from the critical points corresponding to the class
vessel characterize the extent of vascular invasion. In
this study, several margin-derived metrics were developed/adopted to quantify
misclassification of each individual OsSVM model. The margin-derived metrics are
described as follows.First, deeply penetrating vessel points, or points with lower
classification confidence, impact the resectability more than the less invasive
points. Thus, Pvi was defined to heavily penalize
the deeply embedded vessel points in the estimation of overall vascular
invasion:It would also be of clinical interest to determine the maximum vascular
penetration level so that vessels with a small portion deeply invaded by the
tumor can be differentiated from the vessels with a large portion with shallow
tumor infiltration, despite their similar Pvi
values. Given the anatomies of the pancreatic tumors and major surrounding
vessels, separation hyperplanes were mainly oriented in the inferior-superior
direction (Figure. 2 (b)), or
Z direction. The maximum penetration was calculated as:In addition to Pvi and
Pmax, the average and variance of critical point
margins (P
and P) were also used as two
intuitive indicators of the margin distribution. In addition, since the
histogram is also effective in interpreting data distribution, such as the
asymmetry and outliers [11], five
commonly used histogram-based metrics were included in the analysis: mean
(Hmean), variance
(Hvar), skewness
(Hskew), kurtosis
(Hkurt), and energy
(Hener)). Note that the referred histograms were
calculated based on the distribution of margins, which are different from image
intensity based histograms commonly used in radiomic features [12, 13].
Statistical analysis
Between-group student t-tests were first employed for
each metric independently to evaluate their corresponding classification
capacity differentiating LA and BR. The classification power was further tested
using logistic regression followed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC)
analyses.To test if a combination of multiple metrics would further increase
classification power, regularized logistic regression via the elastic net (EN)
was used to narrow down a selection of features [14]. Specifically, using: where X is the input feature set,
Y is the corresponding group label set (0 for LA, 1 for
BR), β is the regression coefficient, and λ is a regularization
parameter. The size of β is penalized by EN based on a weighting of the
L1- and L2-norms,
where L1-norm encourages feature sparsity and
L2-norm encourages feature grouping. The
weighting coefficient α is selected as 0.5. The model was validated
through 8-fold cross-validation with one standard deviation. The classification
power of metrics selected by EN was then evaluated by ROC analysis.The same analyses were also applied to discriminate RE from BR, as well
as RE from all unresectable cases (UnRE, LA + BR).
Results
Metric distributions and Group comparisons
Figure. 4 shows the box plots of
all 9 OsSVM derived metrics. The mean Pvi,
Pmax, Pvar,
Hvar, and Hskew of
LA, BR, and RE decrease following the order of tumor involvement. On the other
hand, the mean Pmean,
Hmean, Hkurt, and
Hener showed the opposite trends, indicating
increasing confidence of tumor-vessel separation from LA to RE. The correlation
between one of OsSVM derived metrics and resectability is shown in Figure. 1, where Pvi
decreases monotonously with increasing resectability. The corresponding
pair-wise group comparisons are displayed in Table. 1. All metrics significantly (p<0.05)
differentiate between LA and BR, BR and RE, as well as UnRE and RE.
Figure 4:
Box plots revealing the distribution of 9 features in groups with
varying degrees of resectability: LA, BR, and RE.
Table 1:
Summary of statistical group comparison results.
LA
BR
RE
LA/BRP
BR/REP
UnRE/REP
Mean
Std
Mean
Std
Mean
Std
Pvi
3000.3
1256.0
1384.1
630.0
1047.7
548.0
<0.0001
0.0471
<0.0001
Pvar
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
Pmax
27.5
11.6
11.2
5.8
2.1
4.4
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
Pmean
1.8
0.1
1.9
0.1
2.0
0.0
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
Hskew[1]
−5.2
1.5
−8.3
3.9
-
-
<0.0001
-
-
Hkurt[1]
32.1
18.3
89.7
84.5
-
-
<0.0001
-
-
Hener
0.9
0.1
0.9
0.0
10.5
0.0
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
Hmean
7.7
0.1
7.9
0.1
27.6
0.0
0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
Hvar
1.4
0.7
0.8
0.6
169.3
0.2
0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
Due to the missing bins in RE cases, Hskew and Hkurt were excluded
from RE related calculations.
Univariate and multivariate regressions
ROC analyses of the OsSVM derived metrics are shown in Table. 2 and Figure. 5. Not surprisingly, by penalizing the penetrating vascular points,
Pmax and Pvi were
the 2 most sensitive classifiers for LA and BR (Figure. 5 (a)), yielding AUCs of 0.91 and 0.89, respectively. Based
on 8-fold cross-validation, five of the nine metrics
(Pmax, Pvi,
Pmean, Hskew, and
Hkurt) were selected by the elastic net as
significant features (Table. 2). The
classification accuracy combining the five features outperformed any single
feature, achieving AUC of 0.95.
Table 2:
Summary of univariate and multivariate (EN) regression results for the
discrimination of LA vs. BR, BR vs. RE, as well as UnRE vs. RE.
LA vs.
BR
BR vs.
RE
UnRE vs.
RE
βu[1]
pu[1]
βEN[2]
βu
pu
βEN
βu
pu
βEN
Pvi
−12.73
<0.0001
−3.34
−2.62
0.0558
-
−12.02
<0.0001
−0.35
Pvar
−6.27
0.0003
-
−13.86
0.0008
−0.56
−29.16
<0.0001
−2.29
Pmax
−15.66
<0.0001
−3.18
−9.15
0.0005
−0.85
−30.78
<0.0001
−3.03
Pmean
8.10
0.0002
0.64
18.27
0.0006
1.19
42.05
<0.0001
2.74
Hskew[3]
−7.01
0.0004
−1.10
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hkurt[3]
9.98
0.0018
1.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hener
7.06
0.0003
-
17.96
0.0008
1.00
40.42
0.0001
3.74
Hmean
6.47
0.0006
-
15.81
0.0010
-
35.94
<0.0001
-
Hvar
−5.88
0.0007
-
−13.69
0.0011
-
−29.89
<0.0001
−0.12
Regression coefficients and p-values obtained from univariate
logistic regression.
Regression coefficients for metrics selected from the elastic net
(EN).
Due to the missing bins in RE cases, Hskew and Hkurt were excluded
from RE related calculations.
Figure 5:
ROC curves for the discrimination of LA and BR (a), BR and RE (b), as
well as UnRE (LA + BR) and RE (c).
For the classification of BR and RE, all metrics except
Pvi yield AUCs greater than 0.96, indicating a
clear differentiation of tumor vessel infiltration between the two groups using
OsSVM model. Four metrics (Pmax,
Pvar, Pmean, and
Hener) were selected by the elastic net as
significant features. The combined metrics further improved the AUC to 0.98. By
merging LA and BR to be a single UnRE group, consistently better AUC performance
than the classification of BR and RE was observed likely due to larger sample
size. In the merged case to differentiate RE from UnRE, six metrics
(Pmax, Pvi,
Pvar, Pmean,
Hener, and Hvar)
were selected by the elastic net resulting nearly perfect AUC.
Discussion
Defining resectability is essentially a problem of interpreting the relative
spatial relationships of two image objects: the tumor and the vessels. Among the
existing tools, force histograms (F-histograms) are
state-of-the-art descriptors to interpret directional relations, such as
‘among’, ‘between’, and ‘surround’ [15, 16].
The fuzzy model has been further developed to quantify the semantic directional
description so that the degree to which a target object is in a certain direction
with respect to a reference object can be evaluated [17, 18]. While playing a vital
role in interpreting images with simple shapes, F-histograms or fuzzy models
inadequately integrate the topological and distance information of objects in
spatial relation reasoning, thus cannot model complicated spatial relationships in
medical images, especially with the presence of blood vessels.For complex spatial configurations, Clément et. al characterized the
degree of imbrication in 2D retinal images using an advanced circular histogram
algorithm [19]. However, the imbrication
metric may not accurately describe PC resectability because the spacing between the
image objects was not integrated into the calculation. Toesca DA et. al provided a
0–10 score criterion based on the maximum circumferential degree and length
of solid tumor contact in CT images [20].
With a decision tree derived cut-off in 294 patients, this finer scoring system
achieved an accuracy of 97% in R0 resection prediction. However, the
semi-quantitative criterion still relied on unidimensional measurements on a limited
of major peripancreatic vessels, and thus lack overall estimation of the whole
perivascular involvement. To extract more insights over the whole 3D tumor volume,
Van der Putten et. al had tried to use radiomic features, drawn from intensities and
spatial arrangement of voxels, to predict resectability. Specifically, from 90
radiomic features, he used the Relieff feature selection to narrow down a set of 9
features in 50 patients and achieved a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 67%
in resectable versus unresectable classification [21]. While providing additional insights about tumor heterogeneity, the
application of radiomics in PC resectability is limited by the unclear
interpretability of the radiomic features and the imbalance between number of
features and sample size [22].We took a different approach in this study. Mimicking the goal of surgical
resection, we used OsSVM classifiers to create a hyperplane that maximally separates
the tumor and vessels. The resultant misclassification correlates to the level of
vascular infiltration. The margin calculation based on critical points is consistent
with the actual clinical condition that only the portion of vessels adjacent to the
resection margin matters. The efficacy of the OsSVM model is highlighted in Figure
1, where the inter-subject differences
spanning the wide spectrum from LA to RE is quantitatively correlated to one of the
OsSVM metrics. As an example, two cases presenting similar appearance in the axial
slices (LA3 and BR1) could have been miss-classified based on the current NCCN
guidelines but they were continuously placed on the resectability spectrum based on
the Pvi values. Therefore, our method is innovative in
quantitatively describing the complex tumor/vessel relationships for finer
categorization of PC resectability.Our current work has two limitations. First, the OsSVM model was built based
on manual segmentation. While careful quality control was implemented, delineation
variabilities cannot be completely avoided. The uncertainties may be amplified by
the fact that multiple CT scanners/protocols were used in this retrospective study.
However, this effect is expected to be small due to consistent image quality
calibration procedures implemented at our institution. With the advances of deep
learning, automated contouring algorithms emerged to maintain high segmentation
accuracy against multi-institutional, multi-protocol dataset [23]. Therefore, automated segmentation techniques shall
be integrated into our future pipeline to increase the robustness against
segmentation variability. Second, we equally treated all vessels in the OsSVM model.
While this strategy helps avoid model overfitting, in surgical resection, the
importance of surrounding vessels varies. For instance, it is more dangerous to
damage celiac axis than other small veins. In future studies, we will prioritize the
vessels according to their importance based on a larger patient sample.
Conclusion
In this study, we introduced a novel OsSVM method to quantify PC
resectability based on contrast CT. We derived metrics that successfully classified
LA, BR, and RE with high classification capacity. To the best of our knowledge, this
is the first study to provide a quantitative definition of pancreatic tumor-vessel
involvement by measuring the anatomical relationship of the two image objects. The
proposed classifiers may provide an improved quantitative imaging guideline to
refine the PC resectability grading system.
Authors: Desiree E Morgan; Clinton N Waggoner; Cheri L Canon; Mark E Lockhart; Naomi S Fineberg; James A Posey; Selwyn M Vickers Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Matthew H G Katz; Robert Marsh; Joseph M Herman; Qian Shi; Eric Collison; Alan P Venook; Hedy L Kindler; Steven R Alberts; Philip Philip; Andrew M Lowy; Peter W T Pisters; Mitchell C Posner; Jordan D Berlin; Syed A Ahmad Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-02-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Yong Yue; Arsen Osipov; Benedick Fraass; Howard Sandler; Xiao Zhang; Nicholas Nissen; Andrew Hendifar; Richard Tuli Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2017-02
Authors: Diego A S Toesca; R Brooke Jeffrey; Rie von Eyben; Erqi L Pollom; Peter D Poullos; George A Poultsides; George A Fisher; Brendan C Visser; Albert C Koong; Daniel T Chang Journal: Pancreas Date: 2019 May/Jun Impact factor: 3.327