| Literature DB >> 32184430 |
Yi Liang1,2, WenJun Zhao2,3, Yan Wang4, GuangPing Fu5, QingQuan Li1, XuChen Min1, YiFang Guo6.
Abstract
Circulating miRNAs have attracted attention as serum biomarkers for several diseases. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of circulating miRNA-21 (miR-21) as a novel biomarker for elderly patients with type 2 cardiorenal syndrome (CRS-2). A total of 157 elderly patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) were recruited for the study. According to an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) cut-off of 60 ml/min/1.73 m2, 84 patients (53.5%) and 73 patients (46.5%) were assigned to the CRS group and the CHF group, respectively. Expression levels of serum miR-21 and biomarkers for CRS, such as kidney injury factor-1 (KIM-1), neutrophil gelatinase-related apolipoprotein (NGAL), cystatin C (Cys C), amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), N-acetyl-κ-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), and heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP), were detected. Serum miR-21, KIM-1, NGAL, Cys C, NT-proBNP and H-FABP levels were significantly higher in the CRS group than in the CHF group (P < 0.01), whereas NAG expression was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). Cys C, H-FABP and eGFR correlated significantly with miR-21 expression, but correlations with miR-21 were not significant for NT-proBNP, NGAL, NAG and KIM-1. Moreover, multivariate logistic regression found that serum miR-21, increased serum Cys C, serum KIM-1, hyperlipidaemia and ejection fraction (EF) were independent influencing factors for CRS (P < 0.05). The AUC of miR-21 based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.749, with a sensitivity of 55.95% and a specificity of 84.93%. Furthermore, combining miR-21 with Cys C enhanced the AUC to 0.902, with a sensitivity of 88.1% and a specificity of 83.6% (P < 0.001). Our findings suggest that circulating miR-21 has medium diagnostic value in CRS-2. The combined assessment of miR-21 and Cys C has good clinical value in elderly patients with CRS-2.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32184430 PMCID: PMC7078306 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61836-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinical characteristics of individuals CHF and CRS group.
| Characteristics | CHF Group (n = 73) | CRS Group (n = 84) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 36/37 | 38/46 | 0.610 |
| Age (years) | 77 (12) | 79 (10) | 0.103 |
| Hypertension | 44 | 56 | 0.406 |
| Diabetes Mellitus | 21 | 25 | 0.891 |
| Hypothyroidism | 15 | 18 | 0.893 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 6 | 15 | 0.077 |
| Coronary atherosclerotic heart disease | 46 | 52 | 0.886 |
| Myocardial Infarction | 22 | 30 | 0.459 |
| HB (g/L) | 128 (21) | 113.5 (27.75) | <0.001 |
| WBC (1 × 109) | 6.27 (2.9) | 6.29 (3.32) | 0.553 |
| EF (%) | 55 (23) | 46 (19.75) | 0.086 |
Data are expressed as Median (Quartile range) WBC: white blood cell count, EF: ejection fraction, HB: haemoglobin.
Expression of the serum biomarkers between CRS and CHF groups.
| Characteristics | CHF Group (n = 73) | CRS Group (n = 84) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NT-proBNP (ng/L) | 1739 (3332) | 5332 (6820) | <0.001 |
| KIM-1 (pg/ml) | 82.23 (94.05) | 127.5 (157.76) | 0.006 |
| NGAL(ng/ml) | 89.3 (48.3) | 130.15 (92.07) | <0.001 |
| Cys C (mg/L) | 1.14 (0.31) | 2.0 (0.95) | <0.001 |
| NAG (nmol) | 14.5 (4.9) | 15.28 (8.51) | 0.166 |
| H-FABP (pg/ml) | 1469.97 (1739.88) | 2677.9 (4191.8) | <0.001 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 74.13 ± 1.07 | 43.23 ± 1.64 | <0.001 |
| miR-21 | 0.53 (0.44) | 0.89(0.89) | <0.001 |
Data are expressed as Median (Quartile range) or Mean ± Standard deviation
CRS: type 2 Cardio-Renal syndrome; miR-21: MicroRNA-21; CHF: chronic heart failure; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; KIM-1: idney injury factor-1; NGAL: neutrophil gelatinase-related apolipoprotein; Cys C: cystatin C; NT-proBNP: amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; NAG: N-acetyl-κ-D-glucosaminidase; H-FABP: heart-typefatty acid–binding protein. P < 0.05 has statistically significant.
Figure 1Expression of each biomarker in CHF and CRS serum. CRS: type 2 cardiorenal syndrome; miR-21: microRNA-21; CHF: chronic heart failure; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; KIM-1: kidney injury factor-1; NGAL: neutrophil gelatinase-related apolipoprotein; Cys C: cystatin C; NT-proBNP: amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; NAG: N-acetyl-κ-D-glucosaminidase; H-FABP: heart-type fatty acid-binding protein.
Figure 2Correlations between miR-21 levels and other biomarkers. miR-21 levels by real-time PCR correlated significantly with Cys C, H-FABP and eGFR (except NAG, NT-proBNP, NGAL and KIM-1) in 157 elderly patients. The variates NT-proBNP, Cys C, NGAL, KIM-1, H-FABP,NAG and miR-21 were log-transformed in Pearson correlation.
Multivariate logistic regression for identification of independent predictors of CRS.
| Variables | B | S.E. | Wald | OR | 95% CI | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EF | −0.062 | 0.022 | 8.126 | 0.940 | 0.901–0.981 | 0.004 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 2.130 | 0.797 | 7.140 | 8.415 | 1.764–40.143 | 0.008 |
| KIM-1 | 1.397 | 0.618 | 5.108 | 4.041 | 1.204–13.568 | 0.024 |
| miR-21 | 2.848 | 0.839 | 11.532 | 17.246 | 3.334–89.218 | 0.001 |
| Cys C | ||||||
| <1.50 (mg/L) | Reference | |||||
| ≥1.50 (mg/L) | 3.396 | 0.580 | 34.342 | 29.858 | 9.588–92.983 | <0.001 |
KIM-1# = log(KIM-1); miR-21# = log(miR-21).
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
miR-21:MicroRNA-21; Cys C: cystatin C; KIM-1:kidney injury factor-1; EF: ejection fraction.
Figure 3ROC analysis of individual biomarkers. KIM-1, NGAL, Cys C, NT-proBNP, H-FABP, NAG, and miR-21 were used to predict CRS in elderly CHF patients.
Figure 4ROC analysis of the individual/combined biomarkers. Combined miR-21+CysC was used to predict CRS in elderly CHF patients compared to miR-21 alone.
AUC for individual/combination biomarkers.
| Biomarkers | The under area of ROC curve (95% CI) | sensitivity (%) | specificity (%) | Youden index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIM-1 | 0.629 (0.539, 0.719) | 39.29 | 87.67 | 0.27 |
| NGAL | 0.681 (0.595, 0.768) | 63.10 | 73.97 | 0.37 |
| Cys C | 0.888 (0.836, 0.940) | 83.33 | 82.19 | 0.66 |
| NT-proBNP | 0.736 (0.655, 0.816) | 73.49 | 66.67 | 0.40 |
| miR-21 | 0.749 (0.671, 0.827) | 55.95 | 84.93 | 0.41 |
| H-FABP | 0.710 (0.626, 0.793) | 72.50 | 64.29 | 0.37 |
| Cys C + miR-21 | 0.902 (0.854, 0.950) | 88.10 | 83.60 | 0.72 |
| Cys C + KIM-1 | 0.891 (0.840, 0.942) | 82.10 | 83.60 | 0.66 |
| Cys C + NGAL | 0.845 (0.784, 0.905) | 67.90 | 93.20 | 0.61 |
| CysC+ H-FABP | 0.877 (0.823, 0.931) | 66.30 | 95.70 | 0.62 |
| Cys C + NT-proBNP | 0.846 (0.786, 0.905) | 84.30 | 72.20 | 0.57 |
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) of individual and combined biomarkers for diagnosing CRS.