Literature DB >> 19929276

Biological variation of cystatin C and creatinine.

Mark Reinhard1, Erland J Erlandsen, Else Randers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the day-to-day biological variation of cystatin C in comparison with creatinine in healthy subjects and in patients with impaired renal function.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight weekly morning blood samples were taken from 20 healthy subjects (13 females and 7 males, median age 44 years, range 25-61) and 19 patients with impaired renal function (8 females and 11 males, median age 61 years, range 35-70). Serum cystatin C was measured using Dade Behring N Latex Cystatin C assay and serum creatinine by an enzymatic method (Roche).
RESULTS: In the healthy subjects mean serum cystatin C was 0.70 mg/L (range 0.44-1.09) and mean serum creatinine 77 micromol/L (range 54-100). The analytical variance was 2.0% for cystatin C and 1.6% for creatinine. The intra-individual variance was greater for cystatin C than for creatinine (8.6% vs. 4.7%). The inter-individual variance was similar for both analytes (cystatin C 15.1% vs. creatinine 14.4%). In the patients with impaired renal function mean serum cystatin C was 1.86 mg/L (range 0.45-3.31) and mean serum creatinine 224 micromol/L (range 103-430). The analytical variance was 1.8% for cystatin C and 1.4% for creatinine. The intra-individual variance was greater for cystatin C than for creatinine (16.0% vs. 8.9%).
CONCLUSION: In the present study, the intra-individual variance was greater for cystatin C than for creatinine in both healthy subjects and in patients with impaired renal function. Accordingly, serum creatinine is the preferred marker for serial monitoring of renal function in individuals with stable muscle mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19929276     DOI: 10.3109/00365510903307947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest        ISSN: 0036-5513            Impact factor:   1.713


  19 in total

1.  Evaluation and comparison of Abbott Jaffe and enzymatic creatinine methods: Could the old method meet the new requirements?

Authors:  Tuncay Küme; Barıs Sağlam; Cem Ergon; Ali Rıza Sisman
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  The performance of contemporary cystatin C-based GFR equations in predicting gentamicin clearance.

Authors:  Paul K L Chin; Janice S C Chew-Harris; Christopher M Florkowski; Evan J Begg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Difficulties in assessing renal function in patients with cirrhosis: potential impact on patient treatment.

Authors:  Andrew Davenport
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  A New Criterion for Pediatric AKI Based on the Reference Change Value of Serum Creatinine.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Sheng Nie; Aihua Zhang; Mao Jianhua; Hai-Peng Liu; Huimin Xia; Hong Xu; Zhangsuo Liu; Shipin Feng; Wei Zhou; Xuemei Liu; Yonghong Yang; Yuhong Tao; Yunlin Feng; Chunbo Chen; Mo Wang; Yan Zha; Jian-Hua Feng; Qingchu Li; Shuwang Ge; Jianghua Chen; Yongcheng He; Siyuan Teng; Chuanming Hao; Bi-Cheng Liu; Ying Tang; Li-Jun Wang; Jin-Lei Qi; Wenjuan He; Pinghong He; Youhua Liu; Fan Fan Hou
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Reference intervals and factors contributing to serum cystatin C levels in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Dong-Dong Li; Meng-Na Zou; Xin Hu; Mei Zhang; Cheng-Yao Jia; Chuan-Min Tao; Lan-Lan Wang; Bin-Wu Ying
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.352

6.  Characterization of kidney injury molecule-1 in cats.

Authors:  S K Bland; O Côté; M E Clark; J DeLay; D Bienzle
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  The eGFR-C study: accuracy of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation using creatinine and cystatin C and albuminuria for monitoring disease progression in patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease--prospective longitudinal study in a multiethnic population.

Authors:  Edmund J Lamb; Elizabeth A Brettell; Paul Cockwell; Neil Dalton; Jon J Deeks; Kevin Harris; Tracy Higgins; Philip A Kalra; Kamlesh Khunti; Fiona Loud; Ryan S Ottridge; Claire C Sharpe; Alice J Sitch; Paul E Stevens; Andrew J Sutton; Maarten W Taal
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  Incomplete reversibility of estimated glomerular filtration rate decline following tenofovir disoproxil fumarate exposure.

Authors:  Sophie Jose; Lisa Hamzah; Lucy J Campbell; Teresa Hill; Martin Fisher; Clifford Leen; Richard Gilson; John Walsh; Mark Nelson; Phillip Hay; Margaret Johnson; David Chadwick; Dorothea Nitsch; Rachael Jones; Caroline A Sabin; Frank A Post
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 9.  Cystatin C: a new renal marker and its potential use in small animal medicine.

Authors:  L Ghys; D Paepe; P Smets; H Lefebvre; J Delanghe; S Daminet
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  A Risk Assessment of the Jaffe vs Enzymatic Method for Creatinine Measurement in an Outpatient Population.

Authors:  Robert L Schmidt; Joely A Straseski; Kalani L Raphael; Austin H Adams; Christopher M Lehman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.