Literature DB >> 26055840

Speech Perception Ability in Noise is Correlated with Auditory Brainstem Response Wave I Amplitude.

Naomi Bramhall1,2,3, Bonnie Ong4, Josephine Ko5, Mark Parker1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Difficulty understanding speech in background noise is a common complaint of individuals with sensorineural hearing loss. Recent animal studies suggest this difficulty may be due, in part, to spiral ganglion cell degeneration related to aging or noise exposure. Although auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds and standard clinical audiometric tests are minimally affected by neuronal degeneration, the amplitude of wave I of the ABR is correlated to spiral ganglion cell density.
PURPOSE: This study hypothesized that wave I amplitude was correlated to speech-in-noise performance. To test this, the relationships between wave I amplitude, age, and speech perception ability were analyzed in human participants. RESEARCH
DESIGN: This is a correlational study. STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 101 ears from 57 adults ranging in age from 19 to 90 yr with a pure-tone average of 45 dB HL or better were examined in this study. Only individuals with no history of neurological disease and ears without any evidence of conductive involvement were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Speech perception was measured in quiet using NU-6 word lists and in background noise using the QuickSIN. Ear canal electrodes were used to obtain ABR waveforms from each ear and the amplitude of wave I was measured as the absolute difference in voltage between the peak of the wave and the following trough. Speech perception performance in quiet and in background noise were both modeled using a linear mixed model with the covariates age, four-frequency pure-tone average (4fPTA), wave I amplitude, and the interaction between 4fPTA and wave I amplitude. ABR wave I amplitudes were modeled using a linear mixed model with age and 4fPTA as the covariates. The correlation between the right and left ears of the same participant were modeled using random effects.
RESULTS: The results indicate that reduced ABR wave I amplitudes are (1) related to increased age, (2) associated with decreased speech-in-noise performance, with the greatest effects in individuals with poorer pure-tone thresholds, and (3) not correlated to speech perception in quiet.
CONCLUSIONS: Reduced ABR wave I amplitude, an indicator of cochlear neuronal degeneration, is associated with decreased speech perception ability in noise, with a more pronounced effect in ears with poorer pure-tone thresholds, but does not appear to contribute to decreased speech perception in quiet. American Academy of Audiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26055840     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.14100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  26 in total

1.  TSP1 and TSP2 Have Unique and Overlapping Roles in Protecting against Noise-Induced Auditory Synaptopathy.

Authors:  Piera Smeriglio; Felix V Wangsawihardja; Rose Leu; Mirna Mustapha
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Age-related changes in envelope-following responses at equalized peripheral or central activation.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Alexandra L Sommer; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  Examining physiological and perceptual consequences of noise exposure.

Authors:  Aryn M Kamerer; Judy G Kopun; Sara E Fultz; Carissa Allen; Stephen T Neely; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory Brainstem Response Altered in Humans With Noise Exposure Despite Normal Outer Hair Cell Function.

Authors:  Naomi F Bramhall; Dawn Konrad-Martin; Garnett P McMillan; Susan E Griest
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Epidemiology of firearm and other noise exposures in the United States.

Authors:  Jay M Bhatt; Harrison W Lin; Neil Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Evoked Potentials Reveal Noise Exposure-Related Central Auditory Changes Despite Normal Audiograms.

Authors:  Naomi F Bramhall; Christopher E Niemczak; Sean D Kampel; Curtis J Billings; Garnett P McMillan
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  Tinnitus and Auditory Perception After a History of Noise Exposure: Relationship to Auditory Brainstem Response Measures.

Authors:  Naomi F Bramhall; Dawn Konrad-Martin; Garnett P McMillan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 8.  Effects of Recreational Noise on Threshold and Suprathreshold Measures of Auditory Function.

Authors:  Angela N C Fulbright; Colleen G Le Prell; Scott K Griffiths; Edward Lobarinas
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-10-10

9.  Peripheral deficits and phase-locking declines in aging adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Rebecca Bieber; Alanna Schloss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Reducing Auditory Nerve Excitability by Acute Antagonism of Ca2+-Permeable AMPA Receptors.

Authors:  Amit Walia; Choongheon Lee; Jared Hartsock; Shawn S Goodman; Roland Dolle; Alec N Salt; Jeffery T Lichtenhan; Mark A Rutherford
Journal:  Front Synaptic Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.