| Literature DB >> 32180973 |
Ratmawati Malaka1, Fatma Maruddin1, Zaraswati Dwyana2, Maynor V Vargas3.
Abstract
The aim of this research was to determine the optimal medium for Exopolysaccharides (EPS) production by a Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus ropy strain isolated from a locally produced commercial fermented milk, in reconstituted skim milk (RSM) 10% (w/v), milk whey (MW), and soy milk whey (SMW), under optimal growth conditions for this strain. Milk whey was made by coagulating fresh milk using papaya latex 3% (v/v); soy milk whey was obtained from tofu household industry. The chemical composition of the substrate media was determined by proximate analysis, and sterilization was accomplished in an autoclave at 121°C for 15 min. Culture media were inoculated with 1% (v/v) of a starter culture of L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and then incubated at 30°C for 16 hr. EPS production, lactic acid content, cell counting, and pH were determined after the media were cooled at 5°C. Findings showed that on the basis of the growth characteristics of L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, the best medium for EPS production was RSM 10% (258.60 ± 26.86 mg/L) compared to the milk whey (69.60 ± 9.48 mg/L) and soy milk whey (49.80 ± 9.04 mg/L).Entities:
Keywords: Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus; exopolysaccharide; reconstituted skim milk; ropy strain; soy milk whey
Year: 2020 PMID: 32180973 PMCID: PMC7063361 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.1452
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Nutritional composition of three types of media used in EPS production by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus ropy strain
| Nutritional composition | Media type | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Milk whey (MW) | Soy milk whey (SMW) | RSM 10% | |
| Water (%) | 96.19 ± 12.00 | 91.65 ± 13.30 | 90.40 ± 11.90 |
| Energy value (Kcal) | 63.85 ± 3.40 | 27.68 ± 3.90 | 35.80 ± 5.60 |
| Protein (%) | 1.97 ± 0.20 | 3.42 ± 0.90 | 3.53 ± 0.60 |
| Fat (%) | 0.62 ± 0.08 | 3.07 ± 0.50 | 0.10 ± 0.02 |
| Carbohidrate (%) | 0.43 ± 0.05 | 1.24 ± 0.08 | 5.19 ± 0.09 |
| Mineral (%) | 0.79 ± 0.07 | 0.62 ± 0.01 | 0.8 ± 0.01 |
Analysis performed at the Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Food of the Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Hasanuddin University.
Figure 1Effect of media type of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus culture on pH of media. MW, milk whey; SMW, soy milk whey; RSM, reconstituted skim milk
Figure 2Effect of media type of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus culture on % lactic acid. MW, milk whey; SMW, soy milk whey; RSM, reconstituted skim milk
Figure 3Effect of media type of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus culture on bacterial number. MW, milk whey; SMW, soy milk whey; RSM, reconstituted skim milk
Figure 4Effect of media type of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus culture on EPS production. MW, milk whey; SMW, soy milk whey; RSM, reconstituted skim milk
Value of 1 g conversion of substrate on 10% SSR media, whey, and tofu water into lactic acid, cells, and EPS
| Media types | Substrates (%) | Lactic acid (mg) | Log CFU | EPS (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSR 10% | 9.5 | 0.17 | 3.37 × 1011 | 2.70a |
| Whey | 3.187 | 1.40 | 2.1 × 1012 | 2.18b |
| Tofu whey | 5.284 | 0.49 | 1.82 × 1012 | 0.94c |
Different letters in the same column show significant differences.