Literature DB >> 32179682

Shared vision for a decarbonized future energy system in the United States.

Deidra Miniard1, Joseph Kantenbacher1, Shahzeen Z Attari2.   

Abstract

How do people envision the future energy system in the United States with respect to using fossil fuels, renewable energy, and nuclear energy? Are there shared policy pathways of achieving a decarbonized energy system? Here, we present results of an online survey (n = 2,429) designed to understand public perceptions of the current and future energy mixes in the United States (i.e., energy sources used for electric power, transportation, industrial, commercial, and residential sectors). We investigate support for decarbonization policies and antidecarbonization policies and the relative importance of climate change as an issue. Surprisingly, we find bipartisan support for a decarbonized energy future. Although there is a shared vision for decarbonization, there are strong partisan differences regarding the policy pathways for getting there. On average, our participants think that climate change is not the most important problem facing the United States today, but they do view climate change as an important issue for the world today and for the United States and the world in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate change; energy transitions; future thinking; policy support; political polarization

Year:  2020        PMID: 32179682      PMCID: PMC7132305          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1920558117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  12 in total

1.  Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs.

Authors:  Geoffrey L Cohen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-11

2.  Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies.

Authors:  S Pacala; R Socolow
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings.

Authors:  Shahzeen Z Attari; Michael L DeKay; Cliff I Davidson; Wändi Bruine de Bruin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Low-cost solution to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of intermittent wind, water, and solar for all purposes.

Authors:  Mark Z Jacobson; Mark A Delucchi; Mary A Cameron; Bethany A Frew
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The future of nuclear power: value orientations and risk perception.

Authors:  Stephen C Whitfield; Eugene A Rosa; Amy Dan; Thomas Dietz
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief.

Authors:  Troy H Campbell; Aaron C Kay
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2014-11

7.  Evaluation of a proposal for reliable low-cost grid power with 100% wind, water, and solar.

Authors:  Christopher T M Clack; Staffan A Qvist; Jay Apt; Morgan Bazilian; Adam R Brandt; Ken Caldeira; Steven J Davis; Victor Diakov; Mark A Handschy; Paul D H Hines; Paulina Jaramillo; Daniel M Kammen; Jane C S Long; M Granger Morgan; Adam Reed; Varun Sivaram; James Sweeney; George R Tynan; David G Victor; John P Weyant; Jay F Whitacre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  INCREASING SAVING BEHAVIOR THROUGH AGE-PROGRESSED RENDERINGS OF THE FUTURE SELF.

Authors:  Hal E Hershfield; Daniel G Goldstein; William F Sharpe; Jesse Fox; Leo Yeykelis; Laura L Carstensen; Jeremy N Bailenson
Journal:  J Mark Res       Date:  2011-11

Review 9.  Bias and ignorance in demographic perception.

Authors:  D Landy; B Guay; T Marghetis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

10.  When does a response error become a judgmental bias? Commentary on "Judged Frequency of Lethal Events".

Authors:  J Santeau
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1978-11
View more
  2 in total

1.  Climate change risk perception in the USA and alignment with sustainable travel behaviours.

Authors:  Jean Fletcher; James Higham; Nancy Longnecker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Investigating similarities and differences in individual reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic and the climate crisis.

Authors:  Nathaniel Geiger; Anagha Gore; Claire V Squire; Shahzeen Z Attari
Journal:  Clim Change       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.743

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.