Literature DB >> 26598655

Low-cost solution to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of intermittent wind, water, and solar for all purposes.

Mark Z Jacobson1, Mark A Delucchi2, Mary A Cameron3, Bethany A Frew3.   

Abstract

This study addresses the greatest concern facing the large-scale integration of wind, water, and solar (WWS) into a power grid: the high cost of avoiding load loss caused by WWS variability and uncertainty. It uses a new grid integration model and finds low-cost, no-load-loss, nonunique solutions to this problem on electrification of all US energy sectors (electricity, transportation, heating/cooling, and industry) while accounting for wind and solar time series data from a 3D global weather model that simulates extreme events and competition among wind turbines for available kinetic energy. Solutions are obtained by prioritizing storage for heat (in soil and water); cold (in ice and water); and electricity (in phase-change materials, pumped hydro, hydropower, and hydrogen), and using demand response. No natural gas, biofuels, nuclear power, or stationary batteries are needed. The resulting 2050-2055 US electricity social cost for a full system is much less than for fossil fuels. These results hold for many conditions, suggesting that low-cost, reliable 100% WWS systems should work many places worldwide.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate change; energy cost; energy security; grid stability; renewable energy

Year:  2015        PMID: 26598655      PMCID: PMC4679003          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1510028112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

1.  Cleaning the air and improving health with hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles.

Authors:  M Z Jacobson; W G Colella; D M Golden
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  SunShot solar power reduces costs and uncertainty in future low-carbon electricity systems.

Authors:  Ana Mileva; James H Nelson; Josiah Johnston; Daniel M Kammen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Saturation wind power potential and its implications for wind energy.

Authors:  Mark Z Jacobson; Cristina L Archer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A path to sustainable energy by 2030.

Authors:  Mark Z Jacobson; Mark A Delucchi
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.142

  4 in total
  14 in total

1.  Air Quality and Health Cobenefits of Different Deep Decarbonization Pathways in California.

Authors:  Bin Zhao; Tianyang Wang; Zhe Jiang; Yu Gu; Kuo-Nan Liou; Nesamani Kalandiyur; Yang Gao; Yifang Zhu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Evaluation of a proposal for reliable low-cost grid power with 100% wind, water, and solar.

Authors:  Christopher T M Clack; Staffan A Qvist; Jay Apt; Morgan Bazilian; Adam R Brandt; Ken Caldeira; Steven J Davis; Victor Diakov; Mark A Handschy; Paul D H Hines; Paulina Jaramillo; Daniel M Kammen; Jane C S Long; M Granger Morgan; Adam Reed; Varun Sivaram; James Sweeney; George R Tynan; David G Victor; John P Weyant; Jay F Whitacre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The United States can keep the grid stable at low cost with 100% clean, renewable energy in all sectors despite inaccurate claims.

Authors:  Mark Z Jacobson; Mark A Delucchi; Mary A Cameron; Bethany A Frew
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  More than one arrow in the quiver: Why "100% renewables" misses the mark.

Authors:  John E Bistline; Geoffrey J Blanford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Reply to Bistline and Blanford: Letter reaffirms conclusions and highlights flaws in previous research.

Authors:  Mark Z Jacobson; Mark A Delucchi; Mary A Cameron; Bethany A Frew
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Opinion: Climate policymakers and assessments must get serious about climate engineering.

Authors:  Edward A Parson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Reaching a 1.5°C target: socio-technical challenges for a rapid transition to low-carbon electricity systems.

Authors:  Nick Eyre; Sarah J Darby; Philipp Grünewald; Eoghan McKenna; Rebecca Ford
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Shared vision for a decarbonized future energy system in the United States.

Authors:  Deidra Miniard; Joseph Kantenbacher; Shahzeen Z Attari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Natural wind variability triggered drop in German redispatch volume and costs from 2015 to 2016.

Authors:  Jan Wohland; Mark Reyers; Carolin Märker; Dirk Witthaut
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Balancing Europe's wind power output through spatial deployment informed by weather regimes.

Authors:  Christian M Grams; Remo Beerli; Stefan Pfenninger; Iain Staffell; Heini Wernli
Journal:  Nat Clim Chang       Date:  2017-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.