Literature DB >> 32176426

Visual experiences during letter production contribute to the development of the neural systems supporting letter perception.

Sophia Vinci-Booher1, Karin H James1.   

Abstract

Letter production through handwriting creates visual experiences that may be important for the development of visual letter perception. We sought to better understand the neural responses to different visual percepts created during handwriting at different levels of experience. Three groups of participants, younger children, older children, and adults, ranging in age from 4.5 to 22 years old, were presented with dynamic and static presentations of their own handwritten letters, static presentations of an age-matched control's handwritten letters, and typeface letters during fMRI. First, data from each group were analyzed through a series of contrasts designed to highlight neural systems that were most sensitive to each visual experience in each age group. We found that younger children recruited ventral-temporal cortex during perception and this response was associated with the variability present in handwritten forms. Older children and adults also recruited ventral-temporal cortex; this response, however, was significant for typed letter forms but not variability. The adult response to typed letters was more distributed than in the children, including ventral-temporal, parietal, and frontal motor cortices. The adult response was also significant for one's own handwritten letters in left parietal cortex. Second, we compared responses among age groups. Compared to older children, younger children demonstrated a greater fusiform response associated with handwritten form variability. When compared to adults, younger children demonstrated a greater response to this variability in left parietal cortex. Our results suggest that the visual perception of the variability present in handwritten forms that occurs during handwriting may contribute to developmental changes in the neural systems that support letter perception.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  development; fMRI; handwriting; letter perception; letter production; literacy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32176426      PMCID: PMC7901804          DOI: 10.1111/desc.12965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  111 in total

1.  The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients.

Authors:  L Cohen; S Dehaene; L Naccache; S Lehéricy; G Dehaene-Lambertz; M A Hénaff; F Michel
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Beyond sensory images: Object-based representation in the human ventral pathway.

Authors:  Pietro Pietrini; Maura L Furey; Emiliano Ricciardi; M Ida Gobbini; W-H Carolyn Wu; Leonardo Cohen; Mario Guazzelli; James V Haxby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex.

Authors:  S Zeki; J D Watson; C J Lueck; K J Friston; C Kennard; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Benefits of multisensory learning.

Authors:  Ladan Shams; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Knowledge about writing influences reading: Dynamic visual information about letter production facilitates letter identification.

Authors:  Teresa Schubert; Caroline Reilhac; Michael McCloskey
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy.

Authors:  P J Kellman; E S Spelke
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Sensory Plasticity in Human Motor Learning.

Authors:  David J Ostry; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  The role of sensorimotor learning in the perception of letter-like forms: tracking the causes of neural specialization for letters.

Authors:  Karin H James; Thea P Atwood
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Authorship effects in the prediction of handwriting strokes: evidence for action simulation during action perception.

Authors:  Gunther Knoblich; Eva Seigerschmidt; Rüdiger Flach; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2002-07

10.  Using fNIRS to examine occipital and temporal responses to stimulus repetition in young infants: Evidence of selective frontal cortex involvement.

Authors:  Lauren L Emberson; Grace Cannon; Holly Palmeri; John E Richards; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 6.464

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ecological validity of experimental set-up affects parietal involvement during letter production.

Authors:  Sophia Vinci-Booher; Karin H James
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.046

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.