Literature DB >> 18830859

The role of sensorimotor learning in the perception of letter-like forms: tracking the causes of neural specialization for letters.

Karin H James1, Thea P Atwood.   

Abstract

Functional specialization in the brain is considered a hallmark of efficient processing. It is therefore not surprising that there are brain areas specialized for processing letters. To better understand the causes of functional specialization for letters, we explore the emergence of this pattern of response in the ventral processing stream through a training paradigm. Previously, we hypothesized that the specialized response pattern seen during letter perception may be due in part to our experience in writing letters. The work presented here investigates whether or not this aspect of letter processing-the integration of sensorimotor systems through writing-leads to functional specialization in the visual system. To test this idea, we investigated whether or not different types of experiences with letter-like stimuli ("pseudoletters") led to functional specialization similar to that which exists for letters. Neural activation patterns were measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) before and after three different types of training sessions. Participants were trained to recognize pseudoletters by writing, typing, or purely visual practice. Results suggested that only after writing practice did neural activation patterns to pseudoletters resemble patterns seen for letters. That is, neural activation in the left fusiform and dorsal precentral gyrus was greater when participants viewed pseudoletters than other, similar stimuli but only after writing experience. Neural activation also increased after typing practice in the right fusiform and left precentral gyrus, suggesting that in some areas, any motor experience may change visual processing. The results of this experiment suggest an intimate interaction among perceptual and motor systems during pseudoletter perception that may be extended to everyday letter perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18830859     DOI: 10.1080/02643290802425914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0264-3294            Impact factor:   2.468


  36 in total

1.  Writing affects the brain network of reading in Chinese: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Fan Cao; Marianne Vu; Derek Ho Lung Chan; Jason M Lawrence; Lindsay N Harris; Qun Guan; Yi Xu; Charles A Perfetti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The effects of alphabet and expertise on letter perception.

Authors:  Robert W Wiley; Colin Wilson; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Neuroanatomy of Handwriting and Related Reading and Writing Skills in Adults and Children with and without Learning Disabilities: French-American Connections.

Authors:  Marieke Longcamp; Todd L Richards; Jean-Luc Velay; Virginia W Berninger
Journal:  Pratiques       Date:  2017-02-07

4.  Effective Beginning Handwriting Instruction: Multi-modal, Consistent Format for 2 Years, and Linked to Spelling and Composing.

Authors:  Beverly Wolf; Robert D Abbott; Virginia W Berninger
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2016-07-23

5.  Relating Visual Production and Recognition of Objects in Human Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Judith E Fan; Jeffrey D Wammes; Jordan B Gunn; Daniel L K Yamins; Kenneth A Norman; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Repetition of letter strings leads to activation of and connectivity with word-related regions.

Authors:  Joscelyn E Fisher; Carlos R Cortes; Jacqueline A Griego; Malle A Tagamets
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Gesture as representational action: A paper about function.

Authors:  Miriam A Novack; Susan Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

8.  The similarity structure of distributed neural responses reveals the multiple representations of letters.

Authors:  David Rothlein; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Men and women differ in the neural basis of handwriting.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Fred Tam; Simon J Graham; Guochen Sun; Junjun Li; Chanyuan Gu; Ran Tao; Nizhuan Wang; Hong-Yan Bi; Zhentao Zuo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Beyond shape: how you learn about objects affects how they are represented in visual cortex.

Authors:  Alan C-N Wong; Thomas J Palmeri; Baxter P Rogers; John C Gore; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.