Literature DB >> 32175911

The Use of Patient-Facing Teleconsultations in the National Health Service: Scoping Review.

Micheal O'Cathail1,2, M Ananth Sivanandan2, Claire Diver3, Poulam Patel1, Judith Christian2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Health Service (NHS) Long-Term Plan has set out a vision of enabling patients to access digital interactions with health care professionals within 5 years, including by video link.
OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to examine the extent and nature of the use of patient-facing teleconsultations within a health care setting in the United Kingdom and what outcome measures have been assessed.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic scoping review of teleconsultation studies following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched up to the end of December 2018 for publications that reported on the use of patient-facing teleconsultations in a UK health care setting.
RESULTS: The search retrieved 3132 publications, of which 101 were included for a full review. Overall, the studies were heterogeneous in design, in the specialty assessed, and reported outcome measures. The technology used for teleconsultations changed over time with earlier studies employing bespoke, often expensive, solutions. Two-thirds of the studies, conducted between 1995 and 2005, used this method. Later studies transitioned to Web-based commercial solutions such as Skype. There were five outcome measures that were assessed: (1) technical feasibility, (2) user satisfaction, (3) clinical effectiveness, (4) cost, (5) logistical and operational considerations. Due to the changing nature of technology over time, there were differing technical issues across the studies. Generally, teleconsultations were acceptable to patients, but this was less consistent among health care professionals. However, among both groups, face-to-face consultations were still seen as the gold standard. A wide range of clinical scenarios found teleconsultations to be clinically useful but potentially limited to more straightforward clinical interactions. Due to the wide array of study types and changes in technology over time, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions on the cost involved. However, cost savings for health care providers have been demonstrated by the goal-directed implementation of teleconsultations. The integration of technology into routine practice represents a complex problem with barriers identified in funding and hospital reimbursement, information technologies infrastructure, and integration into clinicians' workflow.
CONCLUSIONS: Teleconsultations appear to be safe and effective in the correct clinical situations. Where offered, it is likely that patients will be keen to engage, although teleconsultations should only be offered as an option to support traditional care models rather than replace them outright. Health care staff should be encouraged and supported in using teleconsultations to diversify their practice. Health care organizations need to consider developing a digital technology strategy and implementation groups to assist health care staff to integrate digitally enabled care into routine practice. The introduction of new technologies should be assessed after a set period with service evaluations, including feedback from key stakeholders. ©Micheal O'Cathail, M Ananth Sivanandan, Claire Diver, Poulam Patel, Judith Christian. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 16.03.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  scoping review; teleconsultation; telehealth; telemedicine

Year:  2020        PMID: 32175911     DOI: 10.2196/15380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Med Inform


  18 in total

1.  Teleclinics in rheumatology introduced during the first lockdown phase of the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020.

Authors:  Antoni Chan; Annabel Suarez; Joanne Kitchen; Anthony Bradlow
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2021-03

2.  A comparison of in-person versus telephone consultations for outpatient hospital care.

Authors:  Rebecca L Crook; Hina Iftikhar; Steven Moore; Phillipa Lowdon; Pedram Modarres; Simon Message
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2022-07

3.  Comparing medical student experience of face-to-face and remote access consultations during the coronavirus pandemic.

Authors:  Caitlin Patterson; Kathleen Collins; Ian Hunter
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.344

Review 4.  [Remote management of musculoskeletal pain : A pragmatic approach to the implementation of video and phone consultations in musculoskeletal practice. German version].

Authors:  David Hohenschurz-Schmidt; Whitney Scott; Charlie Park; Georgios Christopoulos; Steven Vogel; Jerry Draper-Rodi
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 1.629

5.  Agile Application of Video Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Adeel Abbas Dhahri; Muhammad Rafaih Iqbal; Helen Pardoe
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-11-04

6.  Investigating Patients' Intention to Continue Using Teleconsultation to Anticipate Postcrisis Momentum: Survey Study.

Authors:  Antoine Grenier Ouimet; Gerit Wagner; Louis Raymond; Guy Pare
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Ability and willingness to utilize telemedicine among rheumatology patients-a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Steve S Kong; Lilian A Otalora Rojas; Amnie Ashour; Mathew Robinson; Tyler Hosterman; Neha Bhanusali
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-07-04       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Opportunities in Telemedicine, Lessons Learned After COVID-19 and the Way Into the Future.

Authors:  May Abdel-Wahab; Eduardo Rosenblatt; Ben Prajogi; Eduardo Zubizarretta; Miriam Mikhail
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Telemedicine Across the Globe-Position Paper From the COVID-19 Pandemic Health System Resilience PROGRAM (REPROGRAM) International Consortium (Part 1).

Authors:  Sonu Bhaskar; Sian Bradley; Vijay Kumar Chattu; Anil Adisesh; Alma Nurtazina; Saltanat Kyrykbayeva; Sateesh Sakhamuri; Sanni Yaya; Thankam Sunil; Pravin Thomas; Viviana Mucci; Sebastian Moguilner; Simon Israel-Korn; Jason Alacapa; Abha Mishra; Shawna Pandya; Starr Schroeder; Ashish Atreja; Maciej Banach; Daniel Ray
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-10-16

Review 10.  Optimal management of health care for persons with disability related to spinal cord injury: learning from the Sunnaas model of telerehabilitation.

Authors:  Ingebjørg Irgens; Bodil Bach; Tiina Rekand; Sveinung Tornås
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2020-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.