Literature DB >> 35928204

A comparison of in-person versus telephone consultations for outpatient hospital care.

Rebecca L Crook1, Hina Iftikhar1, Steven Moore1, Phillipa Lowdon1, Pedram Modarres1, Simon Message1.   

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has triggered a transition towards telemedicine for delivering outpatient care. The evidence base for telemedicine is heterogeneous and its efficacy remains debated. We, therefore, designed a mixed-methods semi-structured survey to evaluate patients' and clinicians' experiences of outpatient telemedicine clinics during the pandemic. One-hundred and eighty-eight patients and 69 clinicians from two hospitals in Gloucestershire completed the survey. The quantitative results for patients rated in-person and telemedicine appointments similarly in all areas except communication (p<0.001) and overall quality (p=0.004), both in favour of in-person consultations, while clinicians rated all aspects of telemedicine appointments as inferior, with the exception of convenience (p=0.643). Qualitative analysis highlighted themes of communication and relationship building difficulties, confidentiality concerns, loss of visual inspection as a clinical tool and debatable time efficiency associated with telemedicine. Significant adaptation of current telemedicine services is required before it will be integrated into current practice. © Royal College of Physicians 2022 All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; telehealth; telemedicine

Year:  2022        PMID: 35928204      PMCID: PMC9345241          DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2022-0006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Future Healthc J        ISSN: 2514-6645


  23 in total

1.  A questionnaire for the assessment of patients' impressions of the risks and benefits of home telecare.

Authors:  G Demiris; S Speedie; S Finkelstein
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.184

Review 2.  Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine.

Authors:  F Mair; P Whitten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-03

3.  Cost implications of outpatient teleneurology.

Authors:  R Chua; J Craig; R Wootton; V Patterson
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.184

4.  The use of telemedicine to enhance secondary care: some lessons from the front line.

Authors:  Olwen E Williams; Salah Elghenzai; Chris Subbe; Jeremy C Wyatt; John Williams
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2017-06

Review 5.  How effective are short message service reminders at increasing clinic attendance? A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Guy; Jane Hocking; Handan Wand; Sam Stott; Hammad Ali; John Kaldor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Patient satisfaction with multispecialty interactive teleconsultations.

Authors:  J L Huston; D C Burton
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 6.184

7.  The NHS long term plan.

Authors:  Hugh Alderwick; Jennifer Dixon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-01-07

Review 8.  Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Gerd Flodgren; Antoine Rachas; Andrew J Farmer; Marco Inzitari; Sasha Shepperd
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-07

9.  Telemedicine in the Era of COVID-19: The Virtual Orthopaedic Examination.

Authors:  Miho J Tanaka; Luke S Oh; Scott D Martin; Eric M Berkson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 6.558

10.  The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence.

Authors:  Elham Monaghesh; Alireza Hajizadeh
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.