Jianping Hu1, Yijing Zhao1, Mengcheng Li1, Yin Liu1, Feng Wang1, Qiang Weng1, Ruixiong You1, Dairong Cao2. 1. Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 20 ChaZhong Rd, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350005, PR China. 2. Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 20 ChaZhong Rd, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350005, PR China. Electronic address: dairongcao@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of machine-learning-based computed tomography (CT) radiomic analysis to differentiate high-risk thymic epithelial tumours (TETs) from low-risk TETs according to the WHO classification. METHOD: This retrospective study included 155 patients with a histologic diagnosis of high-risk TET (n = 72) and low-risk TET (n = 83) who underwent unenhanced CT (UECT) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). The radiomic features were extracted from the UECT and CECT of each patient at the largest cross-section of the lesion. The classification performance was evaluated with a nested leave-one-out cross-validation approach combining the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator feature selection and four classifiers: generalised linear model (GLM), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF). The receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of the classifiers. RESULTS: The combination of UECT and CECT radiomic features demonstrated the best performance to differentiate high-risk TETs from low-risk TETs for all four classifiers. Among these classifiers, the RF had the highest AUC of 0.87, followed by GLM (AUC = 0.86), KNN (AUC = 0.86) and SVM (AUC = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning-based CT radiomic analysis allows for the differentiation of high-risk TETs and low-risk TETs with excellent performance, representing a promising tool to assist clinical decision making in patients with TETs.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of machine-learning-based computed tomography (CT) radiomic analysis to differentiate high-risk thymic epithelial tumours (TETs) from low-risk TETs according to the WHO classification. METHOD: This retrospective study included 155 patients with a histologic diagnosis of high-risk TET (n = 72) and low-risk TET (n = 83) who underwent unenhanced CT (UECT) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). The radiomic features were extracted from the UECT and CECT of each patient at the largest cross-section of the lesion. The classification performance was evaluated with a nested leave-one-out cross-validation approach combining the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator feature selection and four classifiers: generalised linear model (GLM), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF). The receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of the classifiers. RESULTS: The combination of UECT and CECT radiomic features demonstrated the best performance to differentiate high-risk TETs from low-risk TETs for all four classifiers. Among these classifiers, the RF had the highest AUC of 0.87, followed by GLM (AUC = 0.86), KNN (AUC = 0.86) and SVM (AUC = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning-based CT radiomic analysis allows for the differentiation of high-risk TETs and low-risk TETs with excellent performance, representing a promising tool to assist clinical decision making in patients with TETs.
Authors: Chengzhou Zhang; Qinglin Yang; Fan Lin; Heng Ma; Haicheng Zhang; Ran Zhang; Ping Wang; Ning Mao Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 6.244