Probiotics are live microorganisms that impart various beneficial effects on the
host, when consumed in an appropriate concentration (de Melo Pereira et al., 2018). The genus, Lactobacillus
is the representative heterogeneous group of the lactic acid bacteria (LAB). The
functional benefits of this genus are widely explored due to its physiological
characteristics and genetic diversity (Montoro et
al., 2016). Several Lactobacillus have been used as
probiotics in functional foods and biotherapeutic agents for rendering
multifactorial benefits to humans and other animals over the past decades (Ren et al., 2014). Although there are many
commercial probiotic strains available in the market, novel probiotics have been
identified with specific properties in past few years, especially those isolated
from the traditional fermented foods (Martins et
al., 2013).Jeotgal or jeot is a salted and fermented Korean
seafood that used as Korean cuisine to enhance the flavor or the taste of the food
(Koo et al., 2016).
Jeotgal is prepared from various types of seafood including
oyster, shellfish, shrimp, and fish and also adding about
20%–30% (w/w) salt and subsequently undergo fermentation
process which improves the palatability and the shelf life of the dish (Guan et al., 2011). Previous studies have
reported the probiotic potential of the bacterium isolated from
jeotgal, particularly adapt to resist acidic and high
concentrations of bile salts that body imposes (Koo
et al., 2016).The synergistic combination of probiotic and prebiotic found in products such as
foods and supplements is known as “Synbiotic” (Adebola et al., 2014). Various combinations of synbiotic show
therapeutic effects against diseases such as respiratory infections, diarrhea,
allergy, and diabetes and some prebiotics showed anti-adhesive activities against
enteropathogens (Shoaf et al., 2006).
Further, the synergistic action of probiotics and prebiotics exhibited great
efficacy compared to the use of either probiotic or prebiotic individually (Mohanty et al., 2018). Dairy products can be
effectively used as a probiotic and prebiotic carrier due to their cohesive
structure, pH, and fat content (Speranza et al.,
2018). In addition, prebiotic may also incorporate to the food to enhance
the quality, safety and functionality of the food. Some authors have reported the
enhanced anti-mutagenic, antioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-proliferative effect
of synbiotic yoghurt (Sah et al., 2015, 2016).This study was aimed to investigate the probiotic potential of L.
brevis KU200019, an isolate from Korean jeotgal and to
evaluate the synergistic interaction with various commercial prebiotics to enhance
the antagonistic activity against foodborne pathogens, as well as to evaluate the
potential use of novel strain in a fermented-synbiotic dairy product in order to
enhance its functionality.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial strains and culture conditions
The probiotic strain used in this study was the Korean jeotgal
isolate, L. brevisKU200019. The organism was identified by 16S
rRNA sequencing performed by Bionics Inc. (Seoul, Korea). The sequencing results
were analyzed by GenBank database from the website http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov by using the Basic Local Alignment
Search Tool (BLAST). The commercial strain, L. brevis ATCC
14869 used for comparative analysis. The L. brevis strains were
propagated and maintained in MRS (de Man, Rogosa, and Shape, Becton, Dickinson
and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) broth at 37°C.
Survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions
The tolerance in simulated gastric conditions of the L. brevis
strains were evaluated as method of Son et al.
(2017b). The L. brevis strains were cultured in 10
mL MRS broth at 37°C for 18 h. The MRS broth was gastric conditioned by
adding 0.3% (w/v) of pepsin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and
changing the pH of the media to 2.5 by using 0.1 M HCl. One milliliter of the
bacterial culture was suspended in 9 mL gastric conditioned MRS broth and
incubated at 37°C for 3 h.To evaluate bile salt tolerance, L. brevis strains were cultured
in 10 mL of MRS broth at 37°C for 18 h. One milliliter of the bacterial
culture was suspended in 9 mL of MRS broth supplemented with 0.3% (w/v)
oxgall (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) followed by incubation at 37°C for 24
h.The survival rate was calculated using the following formula:where, N and N0 represents the viable cell count after and before
incubation, respectively.
Enzyme activity
The enzyme activity of L. brevis strains was measured using the
API ZYM kit (BioMerieux, Lyon, France). The bacterial cell suspension (65
μL) was inoculated to each cupule of the API ZYM strips and incubated at
37°C for 4 h. The ZYM A and B reagents were added to each of the cupules
and the enzyme activity was determined based on the color intensity; 0 (no
activity) to 5 (≥40 nM).
Antibacterial activity of L. brevis strains against
foodborne pathogens
The antagonistic activity of L. brevis strains against
Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 15313, Escherichia
coli O157:H4 FRIK 125, Staphylococcus aureus KCCM
40511, and Salmonella Enteritidis ATCC 13076 was evaluated
following the methods of Son et al.
(2017a). The LAB suspension (10 μL) was spotted on the MRSagar plates and incubated at 37°C for 18 h. The MRSagar was overlaid
with 9 mL of soft nutrient agar inoculated with 1 mL of pathogenic strain
(1×106 CFU/mL). The plates were incubated at 37°C
for 18 h and the inhibition zone diameter was measured.
Autoaggregation and coaggregation properties
Autoaggregation and coaggregation assays were modified slightly from Jeon et al. (2017). The overnight culture
of bacterial cells was harvested by centrifugation at 6,000×g for 10 min
at 4°C. The harvested cells were suspended in phosphate buffered saline
(PBS; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) to achieve an optical density (OD) of
0.3±0.02 at 600 nm (OD0). The LAB suspension (4 mL) was
infcubated at 37°C for 24 h. The absorbance of the samples was measured
at 600 nm after 4 h and 24 h (ODt). The autoaggregation value was
calculated using the following formula:For coaggregation assay, 2 mL LAB strain was mixed with 2 mL pathogenic strain
and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The absorbance of LAB (ODL),
pathogenic strain (ODP), and LAB-pathogen mixture (ODmix)
was measured at 600 nm after 4 h and 24 h. The coaggregation value was
calculated using the following formula:
Cell surface hydrophobicity
The cell surface hydrophobicity was assessed by measuring the bacterial adhesion
to the hydrocarbons following the method described by Lee et al. (2015). Briefly, the bacterial cells were
suspended in PBS to achieve an OD of 0.5±0.02 at 600 nm (OD0).
Then 3 mL of bacterial suspension was mixed with 1 mL xylene and vortexed. The
vortexed samples were incubated at 37°C for 20 min till the two phases
separated. The absorbance of the aqueous phase was measured at 600 nm
(ODt) and the cell surface hydrophobicity was calculated using
the following formula:
Screening of prebiotics using growth assay
Six commercial prebiotics used in this study, lactulose
(4-O-β-D-galactopyranosyl-D-fructose
(C12H22O11), fructooligosaccharide [FOS,
(C6H10O5)n (n>10)], xylitol
(C5H12O5), inulin
(C6H10O5)n (n~36), and dextran(C6H10O5)n (Shinbhi International, Seoul,
Korea). The effect of prebiotics on the growth of L. brevis was
evaluated as described previously (Bevilacqua et
al., 2016). Briefly, MRS medium without glucose (MB cell, Seoul,
Korea) was supplemented with 2% (w/w) prebiotic compounds, 2%
(w/w) glucose (positive control), or without carbon source (negative control).
Following, inoculated with 6 Log CFU/mL of each L. brevis
strain and incubated for 48 h. L. brevis growth was evaluated
through the measurement of absorbance at 600 nm. Data were interpreted as growth
index (GI), through the equation proposed by Bevilacqua et al. (2016).Where, ODs is the absorbance of the samples with different prebiotics,
and ODc is the absorbance of the positive control. In addition, pH of
the sample was evaluated periodically by a pH meter (inoLab pH 7110, Xylem
Analytics, Weilheim, Germany). Prebiotics was selected based on their
synergistic effect on GI for further study.
Adherence ability of L. brevis stains to HT-29 cells in the
presence of prebiotics
The humancolon adenocarcinoma cell lines (HT-29, KCLB 30038) was supplied from
the Korean Cell Line Bank (KCLB, Seoul, Korea). The HT-29 cells were cultured in
RPMI 1640 medium (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v)
fetal bovine serum (Hyclone), and 1% (v/v) penicillin-streptomycin
(Hyclone) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5%
CO2. The adherence ability of L. brevis strains
to HT-29 cell lines was performed as described previously (Yang et al., 2019). Aliquot of bacterial suspension
1×108 CFU/mL was added to confluent HT-29 monolayers and
subsequently, supplemented with prebiotics (20 mg/mL) and incubated at
37°C for 2 h. Samples either added with L. brevis
strains or prebiotics were considered as control samples. To determine the
number (CFU/mL) of L. brevis strains that adhered to the HT-29
cells, the bacterial cells were harvested with 1% Triton X-100
(Sigma-Aldrich), and serially diluted in PBS and plated on the MRSagar
plates.
Inhibition of pathogen adherence to HT-29 cells in the presence of
prebiotics
The ability of L. brevis strains and prebiotic to inhibit the
adhesion of the pathogen to the HT-29 cell line was evaluated following the
method of Jang et al. (2019). The
confluent HT-29 monolayers were inoculated with 1:1 mixture of pathogenic
bacteria and L. brevis (1×108 CFU/mL) and
incubated at 37°C for 2 h in a CO2 incubator. The prebiotics
(final concentration, 20 mg/mL) were added to each well immediately before
incubation. Samples without LAB or prebiotics were considered as control. To
determine the number (CFU/mL) of pathogens that adhered to the HT-29 cells, the
bacterial cells were harvested with 1% Triton X-100 and serially diluted
in PBS and plated on the Listeria selective agar and eosin methylene blue agar
(Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for detecting L.
monocytogenes and E. coli, respectively. The
plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h.
Application of L. brevis strains in dairy product
The probiotics were evaluated for potential application in synbiotic dairy
products by cultivating in skim milk. Strains were activated in MRS broth at
37°C for 24 h and harvested by centrifugation at 6,000×g for 10
min at 4°C. The L. brevis strains (8–8.5 Log
CFU/mL) were inoculated into sterilized skim milk powder (12%)
supplemented with either FOS, lactulose or xylitol (2%). Skim milk
without prebiotic addition was used as control. Samples were stored at
4°C for 28 days and cell cultivability was evaluated in 0, 7, 14, 21, and
28 days by spread plating in MRSagar and incubating at 37°C for 48
h.Five types of fermented skim milk samples were prepared by co-culturing with
commercial starter culture (Culture Systems, Mishawaka, IN, USA) and L.
brevis KU200019 or L. brevis ATCC 14689
(8–8.5 Log CFU/mL). The samples were incubated at 42°C till the pH
drops to 4.0–4.5. Samples were labeled as, fermented skim milk added
with; starter culture (C), starter culture and L. brevis ATCC
14689 (S1), starter culture and L. brevisKU200019 (S2),
starter culture, L. brevis ATCC 14689, and FOS (S3), and
starter culture, L. brevisKU200019, and FOS (S4). Samples were
stored at 4°C for further analysis.After 7-day water soluble extracts (WSE) of fermented skim milk samples were
prepared as described previously with slight modifications (Sah et al., 2014). Fermented skim milk
samples were centrifuged at 22,600×g at 4°C for 30 min. The
supernatant was filtered using a 0.45-μm membrane filter and freeze dried
in a freeze drier and all the lyophilized samples were kept at
–80°C for further analysis. The protein content (mg/mL) of each
WSE was estimated using a Bradford assay with a BSA (0.1–2.0 mg/mL)
standard.The antioxidant activity of WSE (0.5 mg of protein/mL) was analyzed by DPPH
(2,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical) and ABTS [2,2-azinobis
(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) di-ammonium salt] radical scavenging
assays as described previously (Kariyawasam et
al., 2019). Radical scavenging activity was modulated as below
formula,ODc and ODs is the absorbance of control (distilled water)
and samples, respectively.
Statistical analysis
The experiments were performed in triplicates and the data are presented as
mean±SD. Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS statistics 20
(SPSS/IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA). The data were analyzed using one-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA) or independent samples t-test. A difference was
considered significant at p≤0.05.
Results and Discussion
Survival in simulated gastrointestinal tract (GIT) conditions
The probiotics must adapt and maintain their functions even under stress
conditions. The survival rate of L. brevis ATCC 14869 and
L. brevisKU200019 in acidic pH (pH 2.5 and 0.3%
pepsin) condition was 94.20±0.50% and 99.38±0.21%,
respectively (data not shown). Similarly, in previous studies, probiotics
isolated from jeotgal showed 98.76%–99.37%
acid tolerance values (Akther et al.,
2017).The survival rate of L. brevis ATCC 14869 and L.
brevis KU200019 in the presence of bile salt (0.3% oxgall)
was 102.45±0.53% and 115.10±0.13%, respectively
(data not shown). The survival rate of the L. brevis KU15006
strain isolated from Korean kimchi was 105.24% in the presence of bile
salt (0.3% oxgall), which was lower than that of L.
brevis KU200019 (Son et al.,
2017a). Thus, the high survival rate of L. brevisKU200019 in the presence of acids and bile salts indicates its ability to
survive and colonize in the gut to be considered as a potential probiotic.The toxicity of the probiotics was assessed by measuring the production of
enterotoxin enzymes, such as α-chymotrypsin, β-glucuronidase, or
N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase that are associated with intestinal diseases
(de Melo Pereira et al., 2018). The
results revealed that both the strains did not produce the enterotoxin enzymes
(Table 1).
0, 0 nmol; 1, 5 nmol; 2, 10 nmol; 3, 20 nmol; 4, 30 nmol; 5,
≥40 nmol.The selective antagonistic activity of probiotic strains against foodborne
pathogens can have applications in the food industry to prevent food spoilage.
In this study, L. brevis strains inhibited the growth of
L. monocytogenes ATCC 15313, E. coli
O157:H4 FRIK 125, S. aureus KCCM 40511, and S.
Enteritidis ATCC 13076. The antibacterial activity of L. brevisKU200019 was higher than that of commercial strain. The highest antagonistic
activity of L. brevisKU200019 was observed against L.
monocytogenes ATCC 15313 (34.5±1.5 mm) followed by
S. aureus KCCM 40511 (33.5±3.54 mm),
S. Enteritidis (30±3.54 mm), and E.
coli O157:H4 FRIK 125 (29±0.60 mm). However, L.
brevis ATCC 14869 exhibited the highest antagonistic activity
against S. Enteritidis (29±2.60 mm), followed by
L. monocytogenes ATCC 15313 (27.5±0.71 mm),
S. aureus KCCM 40511 (26±1.41 mm), and E.
coli O157:H4 FRIK 125 (25±1.41 mm). The antibacterial
activity of LAB may be due to the production of organic acids, diacetyl
compounds, hydrogen peroxide, and bacteriocin-like peptides (Kariyawasam et al., 2019). Furthermore, the
difference in antagonistic activity can be explained by the level and type of
antimicrobial agents produced during the fermentation process by the LAB strains
(Gad et al., 2016). Thus, novel strain
showed high antimicrobial activity against various foodborne pathogens.
Particularly, L. brevisKU200019 was shown high antagonistic
activity against L. monocytogenes and the value was
significantly higher than the that of the commercial strain, L.
rhamnosus GG showed 22.33±0.58 mm (Jang et al., 2019). This indicated the potential use of this
organism as an adjunct culture in food industry. Particularly, the products such
as fresh cheese and yoghurt those are highly vulnerable to contamination by
L. monocytagenes.The autoaggregation and coaggregation properties of the probiotics with the
potential enteric pathogens can be used as a preliminary screening marker for
the selection of the probiotic strain for administration to humans and for
colonizing property in intestinal tract (de Melo
Pereira et al., 2018). The autoaggregation property ensures that the
probiotic reaches a high cell density in the GIT and subsequently contribute to
the adhesion mechanisms (Ogunremi et al.,
2015). The autoaggregation values are presented in Table 2. The autoaggregation values of
novel strain was distinguished from the L. brevis strains
isolated from other fermented fish product like Hentak (Aarti et al., 2017). Furthermore,
autoaggregation value of L. brevisKU200019 was higher than
L. brevis ATCC 14869 which indicates the high colonization
activity of novel probiotic in gut (p<0.05; Table 2).
Table 2.
Autoaggregation, coaggregation, and hydrophobicity of
Lactobacillus brevis strains
Strains
Autoaggregation
(%)
Coaggregation with
pathogen (%)
Hydrophobicity
(%)
L. monocytogenes
ATCC 15313
E. coli O157:H4
FRIK 125
L. brevis ATCC
14869
58.99±1.34[a]
26.23±2.80[a]
22.07±3.53[a]
45.37±5.58[a]
L. brevis
KU200019
67.21±3.91[b]
41.21±2.6[b]
32.70±4.03[b]
53.33 ±3.63[b]
Means within a same column with different superscripts differ
(p<0.05).
All values are the mean of 3 replicates (mean±SD).
Means within a same column with different superscripts differ
(p<0.05).All values are the mean of 3 replicates (mean±SD).Coaggregation is also a probiotic property that enables the pathogen
agglomeration with the probiotic cells, which results in the elimination of
pathogen from GIT through feces. The strongest coaggregation was observed
between L. brevisKU200019 and L.
monocytogenes ATCC 15313 (41.21±2.61%) followed by
L. brevisKU200019 and E. coli O157:H4
FRIK 125 (32.70±4.03%; Table
2). The coaggregation value for L. brevis ATCC 14869
was lower than that for L. brevisKU200019.General bacteria with high hydrophobic capacity have high adherence ability to
intestinal mucosa. The correlation between the adhesion ability and
hydrophobicity of bacterial surface was reported by Murtini et al. (2016). The hydrophobicity of the L.
brevis KU200019 was higher than that of the L.
brevis ATCC 14869 (Table 2).
This indicated that the high adherence of L. brevisKU200019 to
the host epithelial cells. Hydrophobicity value of L. brevisKU200019 was distinguished from hydrophobicity values of L.
brevis strains isolated from jeotgal by other
authors. The hydrophobicity value for L. brevis G1 and
L. brevis KU15006 were varied from
47%–48% (Son et al.,
2017a).Growth of L. brevis strains in laboratory medium supplemented
with prebiotics (2%) was evaluated and lowest growth was observed in
xylitol and negative control (8%–9%). Partial growth of
L. brevis strains was observed in presence of inulin and
dextran (18.8%–21.3%). Lactulose was positively influenced
growth of L. brevis strains, showed GI values 70.07% and
75.32% for L. brevis ATCC 14869 and L.
brevis KU200019, respectively. Moreover, presence of FOS showed
highest GI value (~100%; Fig. 1).
Nevertheless, concerning the interpretation of GI values it can be concluded
that FOS can be provided the optimal growth conditions for LAB growth (Bevilacqua et al., 2016). In addition, pH of
inulin, dextran, and xylitol supplemented laboratory media were reduced slightly
after 48 h (0.5–0.8), whereas positive control and FOS supplemented
samples showed pH 3–4 reduction after 48 h (data not shown). Effective
utilization of FOS and glucose by L. brevis strains may cause
to produce microbial metabolic products including short chain fatty acids (SCFA)
and lactose and these organic acids production might have caused for declining
pH (Cremon et al., 2018). These findings
are concurred with the fact that selective utilization of prebiotics by LAB.
Fig. 1.
Growth index of Lactobacillus brevis strains after
48 h at 37°C.
The results are the mean of three replicates (mean±SD). Different
letters on the top of the bars are significnatly different
(p<0.05). Negative control, MRS medium without glucose, FOS,
fructooligosachride.
Growth index of Lactobacillus brevis strains after
48 h at 37°C.
The results are the mean of three replicates (mean±SD). Different
letters on the top of the bars are significnatly different
(p<0.05). Negative control, MRS medium without glucose, FOS,
fructooligosachride.Concerning the GI results, FOS and lactulose showed the better features for
future synbiotic application. Although xylitol did not have positive influence
for L. brevis growth, xylitol was also used in further
experiments for comparative analysis.
Adherence ability of L. brevis strains to HT-29 cells in the
presence of prebiotics
The adhesion of the potential probiotic candidates to the intestinal mucus and to
the enterocytes is important for the colonization of the host intestinal tract
(de Melo Pereira et al., 2018). The
adhesion of L. brevis ATCC 14869 and L. brevisKU200019 to HT-29 cells was 73.26±0.33% and
77.25±0.22%, respectively. Difference in the adhesion values can
be explained by variations in the physicochemical properties of the probiotic
cell surface such as autoaggregation and hydrophobic capacities. FOS
supplementation significantly enhanced the adhesion of L.
brevis ATCC 14869 (80.45±0.79%) and L.
brevis KU200019 (88.14±0.98%) to the HT-29 cells
(p<0.05). In contrast, there was no significant difference between
control sample and lactulose or xylitol supplemented samples (p>0.05;
Fig. 2). The enhanced adherence in FOS
supplemented samples can be explained by the fact that, fermentation of
oligosaccharides could produce the SCFAs, supply the required energy for the
proliferation of probiotics and modulate the colonic microbial population and
activity (Mohanty et al., 2018).
Fig. 2.
Adherence of LAB strains to HT-29 cells.
The results are the mean of three replicates (mean±SD). Different
letters on the top of the bars are significnatly different
(<0.05). LAB, lactic acid bacteria; L. brevis,
Lactobacillus brevis; FOS, fructooligosaccharides.
Adherence of LAB strains to HT-29 cells.
The results are the mean of three replicates (mean±SD). Different
letters on the top of the bars are significnatly different
(<0.05). LAB, lactic acid bacteria; L. brevis,
Lactobacillus brevis; FOS, fructooligosaccharides.
Inhibition of pathogen adherence to HT-29 cells presence of
prebiotics
The cell count of L. monocytogenes ATCC 15313 and E.
coli O157:H4 FRIK 125 that adhere to HT-29 cells was
5.80±0.07 Log CFU/mL and 6.06±0.12 Log CFU/mL, respectively (Fig. 3). The number of pathogens adhere to
HT-29 cells was reduced when the pathogens were co-incubated with the L.
brevis strains (p<0.05). The cell count of L.
monocytogenes ATCC 15313 that adhere to HT-29 cells reduced when
co-incubated with L. brevis ATCC 14869 (3.22 Log CFU/mL) or
L. brevisKU200019 (2.79 CFU/mL). Similarly, the cell count
of E. coli O157:H4 FRIK 125 that adhere to HT-29 cells reduced
to 4.89 Log CFU/mL and 4.16 Log CFU/mL, when co-incubated with L.
brevis ATCC 14869 or L. brevisKU200019,
respectively. However, L. monocytogenes ATCC 15313 and
E. coli O157:H4 FRIK 125 adhesion inhibition ability of
novel strain was higher than that of the previous authors. Jang et al. (2019) reported 0.12 CFU/mL and 0.59 CFU/mL
reduction of adhesion inhibition for L. monocytogenes ATCC
15313 and E. coli O157:H4 FRIK 125, respectively when
co-incubated with L. brevis KU15153. This anti-adhesion
property may be due to the competition for the binding sites on the epithelial
cells and available nutrients between the probiotics and pathogens (de Melo
Pereira et al., 2018). When prebiotic tested alone for adherence inhibition,
treatment with FOS resulted in an adherence inhibition of 3.78 Log CFU/mL and
5.24 Log CFU/mL for L. monocytogenes and E.
coli, respectively. The adherence inhibition of FOS was higher than
the other prebiotics (p<0.05). The adherence inhibition of pathogens by
prebiotic oligosaccharides are mediated by various mechanisms. First, metabolism
of prebiotic oligosaccharide by LAB results in the production of antagonistic
agents that inhibit the growth of the pathogens (Shoaf et al., 2006). Second, prebiotic oligosaccharides exhibited
anti-adhesive activity by mimicking the host cell receptor sites. The intestinal
pathogens recognize and bind to these mimicked receptor sites and subsequently
prevent the binding of pathogenic bacteria to the intestinal cells (Kunz et al., 2000). Moreover, prebiotic
oligosaccharide treated along with L. brevis stains and
subsequently, adherence inhibition was measured. The cell count of L.
monocytogenes ATCC 15313 that adhere to HT-29 cells was reduced to
2.86 Log CFU/mL and 2.40 Log CFU/mL, when cultured in a medium supplement with
FOS and co-incubated with L. brevis ATCC 14869 or L.
brevis KU200019, respectively. Similarly, the cell count of
E. coli O157:H4 FRIK 125 that adhere to HT-29 cells was
reduced to 4.65 Log CFU/mL and 3.85 Log CFU/mL, when cultured in a medium
supplement with FOS and co-incubated with L. brevis ATCC 14869
and L. brevisKU200019, respectively. Therefore, the results
demonstrated that synergetic interactions among prebiotic oligosaccharide (FOS)
and L. brevisKU200019 has highest adherence inhibition of
pathogens rather administration them individually (p<0.05).
Fig. 3.
Adherence of (A) L. monocytogenes (LM) and (B)
E. coli (EC) to the HT-29 cells in presence of LAB
strains and prebiotics.
The results are the mean of three replicates (mean±SD). Different
letters on the top of the bars are significnatly different
(p<0.05). LB14869, Lactobacillus brevis ATCC
14869; LB200019, L. brevis KU200019; LAB, lactic acid
bacteria; FOS, fructooligosaccharides.
Adherence of (A) L. monocytogenes (LM) and (B)
E. coli (EC) to the HT-29 cells in presence of LAB
strains and prebiotics.
The results are the mean of three replicates (mean±SD). Different
letters on the top of the bars are significnatly different
(p<0.05). LB14869, Lactobacillus brevis ATCC
14869; LB200019, L. brevisKU200019; LAB, lactic acid
bacteria; FOS, fructooligosaccharides.The strains were evaluated for their ability to use as a probiotic in dairy
products and effect of prebiotics on strains cultivability by culturing
L. brevis ATCC 14869 and L. brevisKU200019 in skim milk supplemented with or without prebiotics during 28 days of
storage at 4°C (Fig. 4). The initial
count of L. brevis ATCC 14869 and L. brevisKU200019 were 8.0 to 8.3 Log CFU/mL in all samples. The bacterial counts were
increased until 7 days of storage in all samples while highest viability was
observed in FOS added skim milk samples. The values for L.
brevis ATCC 14869 and L. brevisKU200019 were
8.59±0.17 Log CFU/mL and 8.86±0.07 Log CFU/mL, respectively.
However, LAB count continued to decrease after 14 days. The steep decline of
L. brevis ATCC 14869 and L. brevisKU200019 were observed in control sample and skim milk added with xylitol,
whereas the steady decrease was observed in skim milk added with lactulose and
FOS. Moreover, the skim milk with FOS showed lowest reduction of bacterial count
and L. brevisKU200019 count was above 8 Log CFU/mL throughout
the storage period. At the end of the shelf-life (28 days) L.
brevis ATCC 14869 and L. brevisKU200019 in FOS
added skim milk were 7.18±0.15 Log CFU/mL and 8.04±0.16 Log
CFU/mL, respectively. Concerning the skim milk, prebiotics showed a positive
effect on maintaining probiotic viability. Noteworthy, L.
brevis ATCC 14869 and L. brevisKU200019
cultivability was positively influenced by lactulose and FOS. Some authors
suggested that protective effect of prebiotics to maintain the probiotic
viability (Speranza et al., 2018).
Furthermore, high viability in skim milk added with FOS can be explained by the
protective role of the fructans by interactions with membrane phospholipids to
maintain the stability of the cytoplasmic membrane of probiotics (Vereyken et al., 2003).
Fig. 4.
Bacterial count of (A) Lactobacillus brevis ATCC
14869 and (B) L. brevis KU200019 in skim milk with or
without prebiotic compounds during storage at 4°C for 28
days.
The results are the mean of three replicates (mean±SD). FOS,
fructooligosaccharides.
Bacterial count of (A) Lactobacillus brevis ATCC
14869 and (B) L. brevis KU200019 in skim milk with or
without prebiotic compounds during storage at 4°C for 28
days.
The results are the mean of three replicates (mean±SD). FOS,
fructooligosaccharides.Antioxidant activity of the fermented skim milk samples were evaluated after 7
days. All samples showed varying degrees of radical scavenging capacities for
DPPH and ABTS assays (Fig. 5), indicating
differences in polarity, hydrolysis of proteins, and ability to donate atoms and
electrons of antioxidant bio-factors (Yilmaz-Ersan et al., 2018). Co-culturing of probiotics with starter
cultures resulted in enhanced antioxidant activity (Fig. 5). The antioxidant activity of S2 and S3 were differ
in both assays (p<0.05). This indicates that antioxidant capacity of
hydrolysates for the same substrate, depends on the types of enzyme from LAB.
This may be due to specific proteases are involved in the hydrolysis of specific
peptide bonds (Sah et al., 2014).
Nevertheless, supplementation of FOS has enhanced the antioxidant activity of
fermented skim milk samples. The values for S3 and S4 was (1) DPPH assay:
28.14±1.64% and 31.23±1.14% and (2) ABTS assay:
34.36±2.04% and 38.82±1.46%, respectively. The
strong scavenging activity in prebiotic supplemented samples may be due to
enhanced viability and activity of probiotics. This finding is in agreement with
Sah et al. (2015) who observed
enhanced antioxidant activities in inulin or pineapple peel supplemented yoghurt
samples.
Fig. 5.
Antioxidant activity of fermented skim milk samples after 7
days.
Different letters on the top of the bars are significnatly different
(p<0.05). Fermented skim milk added with C, strater culture; S1,
strater culture and Lactobacillus brevis ATCC 14869;
S2, strater culture and L. brevis KU200019; S3, strater
culture, L. brevis ATCC 14869, and FOS; S4, strater
culture, L. brevis KU200019, and FOS. The results are
the mean of three replicates (mean±SD). DPPH,
2,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS, 2,2-azinobis
(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid; FOS,
fructooligosaccharides.
Antioxidant activity of fermented skim milk samples after 7
days.
Different letters on the top of the bars are significnatly different
(p<0.05). Fermented skim milk added with C, strater culture; S1,
strater culture and Lactobacillus brevis ATCC 14869;
S2, strater culture and L. brevisKU200019; S3, strater
culture, L. brevis ATCC 14869, and FOS; S4, strater
culture, L. brevisKU200019, and FOS. The results are
the mean of three replicates (mean±SD). DPPH,
2,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS, 2,2-azinobis
(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid; FOS,
fructooligosaccharides.
Conclusion
The present study revealed that L. brevisKU200019 isolated from
jeotgal showed dominant probiotic properties compared to
commercial strain. L. brevisKU200019 exhibited higher survival
rate in gastric conditions and antimicrobial activity against various foodborne
pathogens including L. monocytogenes ATCC 15313, E.
coli O157:H4 FRIK 125, S. aureus KCCM 40511, and
S. Enteritidis ATCC 13076 compared to L.
brevis ATCC 14869. Moreover, synergistic interactions between
L. brevisKU200019 and FOS markedly enhanced the adherence
inhibition of foodborne pathogens to HT-29 cells and confirming the potential use in
modulate the gut microbiota and prevention of pathogen-associated diarrhea.
Furthermore, high survival rate over 8 Log CFU/mL in skim milk and high antioxidant
activity in fermented skim milk confirmed the potential use of L.
brevis KU200019 as an adjunct culture in synbiotic-fermented dairy
products to enhance the safety and quality.
Authors: Ingrid J Vereyken; Vladimir Chupin; Akhmed Islamov; Alexander Kuklin; Dirk K Hincha; Ben de Kruijff Journal: Biophys J Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.033