| Literature DB >> 32160897 |
Fatemeh Karami Chamgurdani1, Jennifer L Barkin2, Khalil Esmaeilpour3, Jamileh Malakouti1, Massimiliano Buoli4, Mojgan Mirghafourvand5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of the mother can be deeply satisfying, but it is associated with many challenges including challenges during the postpartum period that may impede the optimal development of the infant. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of counseling using the Skills Training Approach (STA) on postpartum maternal functioning.Entities:
Keywords: Counseling; Maternal functioning; Postpartum; Skill training approach
Year: 2020 PMID: 32160897 PMCID: PMC7065325 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-020-00914-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Womens Health ISSN: 1472-6874 Impact factor: 2.809
Sociodemographic characteristics of participants by study groups
| Variable | Counselling group ( | Control group ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29.8 (5.4) | 29.1 (4.7) | 0.601* | |
| 33.6 (5.3) | 33.4 (3.5) | 0.830* | |
| 0.808† | |||
| One | 15 (44.1) | 16 (47.1) | |
| Two | 19 (55.9) | 18 (52.9) | |
| 0.628† | |||
| Girl | 16 (47.1) | 18 (52.9) | |
| Boy | 18 (52.9) | 16 (47.1) | |
| 0.356‡ | |||
| Housewife | 33 (97.1) | 30 (82.2) | |
| Employed | 1 (2.9) | 4 (11.8) | |
| 0.063† | |||
| Worker | 9 (26.5) | 4 (11.8) | |
| Employee | 6 (17.6) | 13 (38.2) | |
| Shopkeeper | 5 (17.4) | 9 (26.5) | |
| Others | 14 (41.2) | 8 (23.5) | |
| 0.171 | |||
| Secondary school | 4 (11.8) | 2 (5.9) | |
| High school | 2 (5.9) | 2 (5.9) | |
| Diploma | 18 (52.9) | 14 (41.2) | |
| Academic | 10 (29.8) | 16 (47.1) | |
| 0.259 | |||
| Elementary | 2 (5.9) | 0 | |
| Secondary school | 4 (11.8) | 1 (2.9) | |
| High school | 3 (8.8) | 2 (5.9) | |
| Diploma | 14 (41.2) | 14 (41.2) | |
| Academic | 11 (32.4) | 17 (50.0) | |
| 0.149 | |||
| Completely enough | 3 (8.8) | 8 (23.5) | |
| Somewhat enough | 30 (88.2) | 25 (73.5) | |
| Not enough | 1 (2.9) | 1 (2.9) | |
| 0.190† | |||
| Too much | 11 (32.4) | 6 (17.6) | |
| Much | 12 (35.3) | 10 (29.4) | |
| Medium | 7 (20.6) | 8 (23.5) | |
| Low | 4 (11.8) | 6 (17.6) | |
| Very little | 0 | 4 (11.8) | |
| 0.064‡ | |||
| Too much | 12 (35.3) | 9 (26.5) | |
| Much | 15 (44.1) | 8 (23.5) | |
| Medium | 4 (11.8) | 7 (20.6) | |
| Low | 3 (8.8) | 5 (14.7) | |
| Very little | 0 | 5 (14.7) | |
| 0.604† | |||
| Yes | 12 (35.3) | 10 (29.4) | |
| No | 22 (64.7) | 24 (70.6) |
# Mean (Standard deviation)
§ Chi-square for trend test * Independent t-test ‡ Fisher’s exact test † Chi-square test
Fig. 1Flowchart of the study
Comparison of maternal functioning mean score between groups
| Variable | Counselling ( | Control ( | Mean difference (95% Confidence Interval) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention | 73.1 (8.5) | 71.6 (4.8) | 1.5 (−1.9 to 4.8) | 0.383* |
| Two weeks after the end of the intervention | 95.8 (11.8) | 70.3 (4.5) | 22.9 (18.2 to 27.6) | < 0.001 |
| Before intervention | 11.0 (2.8) | 12.2 (1.7) | − 1.2 (−2.3 to −0.1) | 0.041* |
| Two weeks after the end of the intervention | 14.8 (2.2) | 11.4 (2.1) | 3.8 (2.8 to 4.8) | < 0.001† |
| Before intervention | 9.5 (2.9) | 8.6 (1.6) | 0.9 (−0.2 to 2.1) | 0.105* |
| Two weeks after the end of the intervention | 10.8 (1.4) | 8.5 (1.5) | 2.0 (1.4 to 2.6) | < 0.001† |
| Before intervention | 10.3 (3.1) | 10.7 (1.6) | −0.4 (−1.6 to 0.8) | 0.520* |
| Two weeks after the end of the intervention | 15.1 (2.2) | 10.5 (1.7) | 4.8 (3.9 to 5.7) | < 0.001† |
| Before intervention | 35.6 (5.6) | 34.3 (3.9) | 1.3 (−1.0 to 3.7) | 0.261* |
| Two weeks after the end of the intervention | 43.3 (3.3) | 34.7 (3.2) | 8.4 (6.8 to 9.9) | < 0.001† |
| Before intervention | 10.5 (3.3) | 9.8 (2.3) | 0.7 (−0.7 to 2.1) | 0.311* |
| Two weeks after the end of the intervention | 15.1 (2) | 10.9 (1.6) | 4.0 (3.1 to 4.8) | < 0.001† |
| Before intervention | 19.9 (3.7) | 20.3 (2.95) | −0.5 (−2.1 to 1.2) | 0.566* |
| Two weeks after the end of the intervention | 26.6 (4.5) | 19.97 (2.6) | 6.8 (5.1 to 8.4) | < 0.001† |
| Before intervention | 7.3 (2.8) | 7.79 (2.1) | −0.5 (−1.7 to 0.7) | 0.440* |
| Two weeks after the end of the intervention | 10.5 (1.4) | 1.95 (7.5) | 3.2 (2.4 to 3.9) | < 0.001† |
† ANCOVA test with adjusting the baseline score * Independent t-test ‡ Standard Deviation