Jennifer L Barkin1, Katherine L Wisner. 1. Department of Community Medicine, Mercer University School of Medicine, 1550 College Street, Macon, GA 31207, USA. barkinj@gmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the following: (1) women's perceptions regarding the role of maternal self-care, (2) specific applications of self-care in new motherhood and (3) barriers to practising effective self-care. DESIGN: three focus groups were conducted in order to study women's perspectives regarding the key components of new motherhood. SETTING: Recruitment took place in Allegheny County, surrounding Pittsburgh. The focus groups were held at the University of Pittsburgh's Medical School. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one adult women who had given birth in the year prior to enrollment participated in the study. METHODS: The focus group conversations were recorded and transcribed for purposes of qualitative analysis. Conversation related to maternal self-care, which was identified as a component of new motherhood, was grouped into one of three categories: (1) women's valuations of self-care, (2) effective applications of self-care and (3) barriers to good self-care practice. FINDINGS: Two ideologies regarding the role of self-care emerged. In one conception of effective mothering, self-care was of primary importance. On the contrary, some women associated a sometimes extreme form of self-sacrifice with new motherhood. Effective applications of self-care included taking time to exercise, allowing the infant's father to care for the child for a period of time and going out to restaurants. Barriers to good self-care practice were time, other limited resources such as money and social support and difficulty accepting help and setting boundaries. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Additional focus groups should be conducted with the purpose of studying maternal self-care exclusively. This work is an important first step in identifying ways to help new mothers better care for themselves.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the following: (1) women's perceptions regarding the role of maternal self-care, (2) specific applications of self-care in new motherhood and (3) barriers to practising effective self-care. DESIGN: three focus groups were conducted in order to study women's perspectives regarding the key components of new motherhood. SETTING: Recruitment took place in Allegheny County, surrounding Pittsburgh. The focus groups were held at the University of Pittsburgh's Medical School. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one adult women who had given birth in the year prior to enrollment participated in the study. METHODS: The focus group conversations were recorded and transcribed for purposes of qualitative analysis. Conversation related to maternal self-care, which was identified as a component of new motherhood, was grouped into one of three categories: (1) women's valuations of self-care, (2) effective applications of self-care and (3) barriers to good self-care practice. FINDINGS: Two ideologies regarding the role of self-care emerged. In one conception of effective mothering, self-care was of primary importance. On the contrary, some women associated a sometimes extreme form of self-sacrifice with new motherhood. Effective applications of self-care included taking time to exercise, allowing the infant's father to care for the child for a period of time and going out to restaurants. Barriers to good self-care practice were time, other limited resources such as money and social support and difficulty accepting help and setting boundaries. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Additional focus groups should be conducted with the purpose of studying maternal self-care exclusively. This work is an important first step in identifying ways to help new mothers better care for themselves.
Authors: Janet A DiPietro; Matthew A Goldshore; Katie T Kivlighan; Heather A Pater; Kathleen A Costigan Journal: J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 2.949
Authors: Ariana M Albanese; Pamela A Geller; Jackson M Steinkamp; Joan R Bloch; Chris Sikes; Jennifer L Barkin Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Jennifer L Barkin; Katherine L Wisner; Joyce T Bromberger; Scott R Beach; Stephen R Wisniewski Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Kristen G Williams; Kayla T Patel; Julie M Stausmire; Christy Bridges; Mary W Mathis; Jennifer L Barkin Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-01-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Fatemeh Karami Chamgurdani; Jennifer L Barkin; Carolann L Curry; Mojgan Mirghafourvand Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Elisabeth Kurth; Katrin Krähenbühl; Manuela Eicher; Susanne Rodmann; Luzia Fölmli; Cornelia Conzelmann; Elisabeth Zemp Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Maya Nina Mascarenhas; June Maylin Chan; Eric Vittinghoff; Erin Lynn Van Blarigan; Frederick Hecht Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 5.428