Literature DB >> 32158651

Use of Clavien-Dindo Classification System in Assessing Head and Neck Surgery Complications.

Srujan Vallur1, Angshuman Dutta2, A P Arjun1.   

Abstract

Improving quality of postoperative surgical care in head and neck surgery requires reporting of complications. Clavien-Dindo classification system can be used in grading complications related to head and neck surgery and to assess interobserver variability in grading complex complication scenarios. Data was collected from 242 patients who underwent Head and Neck Surgery from 2015 to 2018 at Dept. of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery at a tertiary care hospital. 177 patients had complications were graded based on Clavien-Dindo classification system, into a 5-scale classification system. Interobserver reliability scores for the complication grading scenarios were found to be statistically significant. Construct validity was confirmed as the length of stay in the hospital was statistically related to complication grade (P = 0.032) Reporting of complications is critical to quality improvement in surgical practice. The Clavien-Dindo complication grading scale system was found to be a useful tool for grading head and neck surgery complications. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clavien classification; Head and neck; Quality improvement; Surgical complications

Year:  2019        PMID: 32158651      PMCID: PMC7040148          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-019-01718-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  18 in total

1.  Complexity- and risk-adjusted model for measuring surgical outcome.

Authors:  S B Pillai; A M van Rij; S Williams; I A Thomson; M J Putterill; S Greig
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Reliability of a complication classification system for orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Ernest L Sink; Michael Leunig; Ira Zaltz; Jennifer Claire Gilbert; John Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Surgical complication outcome (SCOUT) score: a new method to evaluate quality of care in vascular surgery.

Authors:  J J Pomposelli; S K Gupta; D C Zacharoulis; R Landa; A Miller; R Nanda
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 4.  The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; David C Linehan; William G Hawkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.

Authors:  Pierre A Clavien; Jeffrey Barkun; Michelle L de Oliveira; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Daniel Dindo; Richard D Schulick; Eduardo de Santibañes; Juan Pekolj; Ksenija Slankamenac; Claudio Bassi; Rolf Graf; René Vonlanthen; Robert Padbury; John L Cameron; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Recording and classification of complications in a surgical practice.

Authors:  M R Veen; J W Lardenoye; G W Kastelein; P J Breslau
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1999-05

7.  Complications after free flap surgery: do we need a standardized classification of surgical complications?

Authors:  Christos Perisanidis; Beata Herberger; Nikolaos Papadogeorgakis; Rudolf Seemann; Christina Eder-Czembirek; Dietmar Tamandl; Georg Heinze; Panayiotis A Kyzas; Anastasios Kanatas; David Mitchell; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Rolf Ewers
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 1.651

Review 8.  Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature.

Authors:  Robert C G Martin; Murray F Brennan; David P Jaques
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Surgical research or comic opera: questions, but few answers.

Authors:  R Horton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Postoperative complications after major head and neck surgery with free flap repair--prevalence, patterns, and determinants: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jeremy D McMahon; Colin MacIver; Miller Smith; Panos Stathopoulos; Craig Wales; Richard McNulty; Thomas P B Handley; John C Devine
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 1.651

View more
  1 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Oral Cavity Cancer: Predictive Factors for Response and Interim Analysis of the Prospective INVERT-Trial.

Authors:  Jens von der Grün; Ria Winkelmann; Iris Burck; Daniel Martin; Franz Rödel; Peter Johannes Wild; Katrin Bankov; Andreas Weigert; Ivan-Maximiliano Kur; Christian Brandts; Natalie Filmann; Christian Issing; Philipp Thönissen; Anna Maria Tanneberger; Claus Rödel; Shahram Ghanaati; Panagiotis Balermpas
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 6.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.