Literature DB >> 10391156

Recording and classification of complications in a surgical practice.

M R Veen1, J W Lardenoye, G W Kastelein, P J Breslau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To document the incidence and outcome of complications in the department of surgery.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: District hospital, The Netherlands.
SUBJECTS: 7455 patients operated on between 1 January 1993 and 31 December 1995. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Documentation and outcome of complications (defined as "every unwanted development in the illness of the patient or in the treatment of the patient's illness that occurs in the clinic").
RESULTS: 1078 complications were recorded after 8130 operations (13%), 337 (33%) of which had no long term effects. 175/1078 (16%) required reoperation, and in 134 of these (77%) an error in management or surgical technique was responsible for the complication. 6 patients were irreversibly harmed and of the 141 patients who died, 11 had evidence of some sort of error.
CONCLUSIONS: Audit of complications is necessary to improve practice in a surgical department, and weekly morbidity and mortality meetings are a good opportunity for learning about them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10391156     DOI: 10.1080/110241599750006622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg        ISSN: 1102-4151


  20 in total

1.  The registration of complications in surgery: a learning curve.

Authors:  Eelco J Veen; Maryska L G Janssen-Heijnen; Loek P H Leenen; Jan A Roukema
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Adverse outcomes in surgical patients: implementation of a nationwide reporting system.

Authors:  P J Marang-van de Mheen; M C Stadlander; J Kievit
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-10

3.  What is a surgical complication?

Authors:  Daniel K Sokol; James Wilson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Ethics of surgical complications.

Authors:  Simisade Adedeji; Daniel K Sokol; Thomas Palser; Martin McKneally
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Standardised Registration of Surgical Complications in Laparoscopic-Gynaecological Therapeutic Procedures Using the Clavien-Dindo Classification.

Authors:  M P Radosa; G Meyberg-Solomayer; J Radosa; J Vorwergk; K Oettler; A Mothes; S Baum; I Juhasz-Boess; E Petri; E F Solomayer; I B Runnebaum
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Development and assessment of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center's Surgical Secondary Events grading system.

Authors:  Vivian E Strong; Luke V Selby; Mindy Sovel; Joseph J Disa; William Hoskins; Ronald Dematteo; Peter Scardino; David P Jaques
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Use of Clavien-Dindo Classification System in Assessing Head and Neck Surgery Complications.

Authors:  Srujan Vallur; Angshuman Dutta; A P Arjun
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-07-25

8.  Continuous monitoring of adverse events: influence on the quality of care and the incidence of errors in general surgery.

Authors:  Pere Rebasa; Laura Mora; Alexis Luna; Sandra Montmany; Helena Vallverdú; Salvador Navarro
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Standard outpatient re-evaluation for patients not admitted to the hospital after emergency department evaluation for acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  Boudewijn R Toorenvliet; Rutger F R Bakker; Hans C Flu; Jos W S Merkus; Jaap F Hamming; Paul J Breslau
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.