Literature DB >> 11531637

Factors influencing the decision to use or discard cryopreserved embryos.

A S Svanberg1, J Boivin, T Bergh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Couples' reasons for discarding supernumerary fertilized cryopreserved embryos and gender differences in attitudes toward the frozen embryos were investigated among Swedish couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) at a private clinic. At the time of the study Swedish law stipulated that couples could keep their frozen embryos for a maximum of one year, with the possibility of an extension based on individual requests.
METHODS: A questionnaire with structured and unstructured questions was sent to 124 women and 124 men who had entered the IVF treatment and obtained supernumerary embryos from 1 January 1994 to 1 March 1995. Eighty-two women and 74 men completed the questionnaire.
RESULTS: After a mean storage time of 25.3 (+/-11.0) months 22 (26.8%) of the responding couples had their embryos discarded. The reasons were mainly practical, such as a positive outcome of IVF and a legally too short storage time. Comparisons between women and men showed that fewer women (13;17.6%) than men (20;27%) had been uncertain during the IVF treatment about using the frozen embryos at a later date and that men more often than women expressed anxieties about possible effects of the freezing procedure on the potential child (p=0.009).
CONCLUSION: A positive outcome of the original IVF treatment and a short maximum legal time of cryopreservation were the most common reasons why couples discarded their embryos. The men more often than women expressed anxieties about possible effects on a potential child. The results emphasize the need for giving detailed information to the couples about cryopreserved embryos and children born by this method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11531637     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.080009849.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  6 in total

1.  What do patients want? Expectations and perceptions of IVF clinic information and support regarding frozen embryo disposition.

Authors:  Robert D Nachtigall; Kirstin Mac Dougall; Matthew Lee; Jennifer Harrington; Gay Becker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Using Surplus Embryos and Research Embryos in Stem Cell Research: Ethical Viewpoints of Buddhist, Hindu and Catholic Leaders in Malaysia on the Permissibility of Research.

Authors:  Mathana Amaris Fiona Sivaraman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Decisional conflict among couples seeking specialty treatment for infertility in the USA: a longitudinal exploratory study.

Authors:  R Anguzu; R Cusatis; N Fergestrom; A Cooper; K D Schoyer; J B Davis; J Sandlow; K E Flynn
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Discarding IVF embryos: reporting on global practices.

Authors:  M Simopoulou; K Sfakianoudis; P Giannelou; A Rapani; E Maziotis; P Tsioulou; S Grigoriadis; E Simopoulos; D Mantas; M Lambropoulou; M Koutsilieris; K Pantos; J C Harper
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Using fertile couples as embryo donors: An ethical dilemma.

Authors:  Leila Alizadeh; Reza Omani Samani
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2014-03

6.  Evaluation of the effect of the elective blastocyst-stage embryo transfer and freezing strategy on the abandonment of frozen embryos under the Taiwan National Assisted Reproduction Act.

Authors:  Kuo-Chung Lan; Ya-Jung Tseng; Yi-Ru Su; Tzu-Yu Lin; Yi-Chi Lin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.412

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.