Literature DB >> 23830151

Optimal in vitro fertilization in 2020 should reduce treatment burden and enhance care delivery for patients and staff.

Sofia Gameiro1, Jacky Boivin, Alice Domar.   

Abstract

This review argues that optimal in vitro fertilization in 2020 should include a way of enhancing the delivery of treatment for patients and staff by the minimization of patient, treatment, and clinic sources of burden. Two specific sources of burden are addressed. First, patient vulnerability can be tackled by implementation of pretreatment evidence-based screening for psychological distress, appropriate referral for support, elimination of barriers to acceptance of psychosocial support, and implementation of a routine care flowchart that identifies the specific stages of treatment when psychosocial support should be provided. Second, negative patient-staff interactions can be avoided by training staff in communication/interaction skills, promoting shared decision making, prioritizing psychological interventions that address aspects of care equally problematic for patients and staff, and monitoring the impact of change on patient, staff, and clinic outcomes. In addition, optimal in vitro fertilization should ensure now that the future generations of young adults know what "achieving parenthood" actually entails in the context of the many desired goals of adulthood, greater variety of reproductive techniques available, later age of first births, and, consequently, longer exposure to risk factors (e.g., smoking) that affect fertility.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; Infertility; patient vulnerability; patient–staff interactions; psychosocial care

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23830151     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  10 in total

1.  Delayed versus immediate frozen embryo transfer after oocyte retrieval: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jialyu Huang; Jiaying Lin; Xuefeng Lu; Renfei Cai; Ning Song; Yanping Kuang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Decisional conflict among couples seeking specialty treatment for infertility in the USA: a longitudinal exploratory study.

Authors:  R Anguzu; R Cusatis; N Fergestrom; A Cooper; K D Schoyer; J B Davis; J Sandlow; K E Flynn
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Preconception lifestyle advice for people with infertility.

Authors:  Tessy Boedt; Anne-Catherine Vanhove; Melissa A Vercoe; Christophe Matthys; Eline Dancet; Sharon Lie Fong
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-29

Review 4.  Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for psychological and pregnancy outcomes in infertile women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yoon Frederiksen; Ingeborg Farver-Vestergaard; Ninna Grønhøj Skovgård; Hans Jakob Ingerslev; Robert Zachariae
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Certain Less Invasive Infertility Treatments Associated with Different Levels of Pregnancy-Related Anxiety in Pregnancies Conceived via In Vitro Fertilization.

Authors:  Eleanor Lowndes Stevenson; Richard Sloane
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

Review 6.  The relationship between stress and infertility.

Authors:  Kristin L Rooney; Alice D Domar
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.986

7.  Effectiveness of a mobile preconception lifestyle programme in couples undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF): the protocol for the PreLiFe randomised controlled trial (PreLiFe-RCT).

Authors:  Tessy Boedt; Eline Dancet; Sharon Lie Fong; Karen Peeraer; Diane De Neubourg; Sofie Pelckmans; Arne van de Vijver; Jan Seghers; Katleen Van der Gucht; Ben Van Calster; Carl Spiessens; Christophe Matthys
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Predictors for the Early Termination of a Psychological Intervention During Treatment with Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Authors:  Marie Bernd; Maren Schick; Sabine Rösner; Ariane Germeyer; Thomas Strowitzki; Markus Moessner; Stephanie Bauer; Beate Ditzen; Tewes Wischmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Timing of frozen-thawed embryo transfer after controlled ovarian stimulation in a non-elective freeze-all policy.

Authors:  Jialyu Huang; Xuefeng Lu; Qin Xie; Jiaying Lin; Renfei Cai; Yanping Kuang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

10.  The interval between oocyte retrieval and frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer does not affect the live birth rate and obstetrical outcomes.

Authors:  Mathilde Bourdon; Pietro Santulli; Chloé Maignien; Khaled Pocate-Cheriet; Asim Alwohaibi; Louis Marcellin; Sarah Blais; Charles Chapron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.