Literature DB >> 32151439

Behavior-Specific Cognitions Moderate Rural Women's Responsiveness to Web-Based Interventions for Weight Loss.

Kevin A Kupzyk1, Bunny Pozehl2, Carol H Pullen2, Patricia A Hageman3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether baseline behavior-specific cognitions moderated the effects of 2 Web-based interventions with enhanced features on weight loss success in rural women.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of behavior-specific cognition data from a community-based, randomized controlled trial, as potential moderators of weight loss over 30 months. PARTICIPANTS: Women, overweight or obese, from rural communities, aged 40-69 years (n = 200).
INTERVENTIONS: Theory-based Web interventions, with enhanced features of either peer-led Web discussion or professional e-mail counseling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Benefits and barriers to healthy eating and activity; self-efficacy and interpersonal support for healthy eating and activity using validated surveys; and weight. ANALYSIS: Longitudinal multilevel models.
RESULTS: Women in the professional e-mail counseling group were more likely to lose weight if they perceived fewer barriers to and higher self-efficacy for healthy eating and activity. Greater weight loss in the peer-led discussion group was observed for women with lower self-efficacy and higher perceptions of barriers. Interpersonal support did not moderate the effects of the interventions. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Although women in 2 different Web-enhanced interventions achieved similar weight loss, their baseline perceptions of behavior-specific cognitions moderated their relationship with the type of intervention and weight loss success. These findings, although exploratory, may assist in matching women to Web interventions that would best maximize weight loss success. Further research is needed. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Web-based intervention; behavior-specific cognitions; moderation; rural; weight loss

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32151439      PMCID: PMC9154085          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav        ISSN: 1499-4046            Impact factor:   2.822


  30 in total

1.  Promoting health: intervention strategies from social and behavioral research.

Authors:  B D Smedley; S L Syme
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

Review 2.  Effectiveness of web-based interventions in achieving weight loss and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Neve; P J Morgan; P R Jones; C E Collins
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 3.  A systematic review of peer-supported interventions for health promotion and disease prevention.

Authors:  Rajeev Ramchand; Sangeeta C Ahluwalia; Lea Xenakis; Eric Apaydin; Laura Raaen; Geoffrey Grimm
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 4.  Assessment of psychological predictors of weight loss: How and what for?

Authors:  Lisa Lazzeretti; Francesco Rotella; Laura Pala; Carlo Maria Rotella
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03-22

5.  Development and psychometric evaluation of the exercise benefits/barriers scale.

Authors:  K R Sechrist; S N Walker; N J Pender
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.228

6.  The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors.

Authors:  J F Sallis; R M Grossman; R B Pinski; T L Patterson; P R Nader
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  A randomized comparison of two motivationally enhanced Internet behavioral weight loss programs.

Authors:  Kelly H Webber; Deborah F Tate; J Michael Bowling
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2008-06-28

9.  Dietary and physical activity behaviors among adults successful at weight loss maintenance.

Authors:  Judy Kruger; Heidi Michels Blanck; Cathleen Gillespie
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 10.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of internet-delivered interventions providing personalized feedback for weight loss in overweight and obese adults.

Authors:  A Sherrington; J J Newham; R Bell; A Adamson; E McColl; V Araujo-Soares
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 9.213

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.