Literature DB >> 18675402

A randomized comparison of two motivationally enhanced Internet behavioral weight loss programs.

Kelly H Webber1, Deborah F Tate, J Michael Bowling.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sixty-six women participated in this study, which compared two 16-week motivationally enhanced weight loss interventions. Both intervention groups, which are entitled "Minimal" and "Enhanced" throughout the description that follows, received a motivationally enhanced initial face-to-face weight loss session. The initial session was followed by a 16-week Internet behavioral weight loss program, which included a study website with weekly lessons, an online self-monitoring diary form, web links to related sites, and separate message boards. The Enhanced group also received weekly moderated online chat group sessions led using motivational techniques.
RESULTS: Both groups lost weight over time (p<0.001), however the group by time interaction was non-significant (p=0.19). The Minimal group lost 5.22+/-4.72 kg and the Enhanced group lost 3.71+/-4.46 kg. In the Enhanced group, online chat session attendance averaged 8.0 of the 16 chats offered. Greater program utilization was associated with greater weight loss in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of weekly motivationally enhanced online chats did not increase weight loss in this study. Further research is needed on the type and frequency of group support that is most desirable and beneficial in Internet weight loss interventions and could also explore building motivation for program utilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18675402     DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  38 in total

Review 1.  A review of efficacious technology-based weight-loss interventions: five key components.

Authors:  Anna Khaylis; Themis Yiaslas; Jessica Bergstrom; Cheryl Gore-Felton
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  Interest in a Twitter-delivered weight loss program among women of childbearing age.

Authors:  Molly E Waring; Kristin L Schneider; Bradley M Appelhans; Tiffany A Moore Simas; Rui S Xiao; Matthew C Whited; Andrew M Busch; Martinus M Evans; Sherry L Pagoto
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  Technology-assisted weight management interventions: systematic review of clinical trials.

Authors:  Jerilyn K Allen; Janna Stephens; Angel Patel
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 4.  Interactive computer-based interventions for weight loss or weight maintenance in overweight or obese people.

Authors:  L Susan Wieland; Louise Falzon; Chris N Sciamanna; Kimberlee J Trudeau; Suzanne Brodney; Joseph E Schwartz; Karina W Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15

5.  Weight loss social support in 140 characters or less: use of an online social network in a remotely delivered weight loss intervention.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy; Deborah F Tate
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Can the artificial intelligence technique of reinforcement learning use continuously-monitored digital data to optimize treatment for weight loss?

Authors:  Evan M Forman; Stephanie G Kerrigan; Meghan L Butryn; Adrienne S Juarascio; Stephanie M Manasse; Santiago Ontañón; Diane H Dallal; Rebecca J Crochiere; Danielle Moskow
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2018-08-25

Review 7.  Lifestyle interventions for cardiovascular disease risk reduction: a systematic review of the effects of diet composition, food provision, and treatment modality on weight loss.

Authors:  Gareth R Dutton; Melissa H Laitner; Michael G Perri
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.113

8.  The effect of a motivational intervention on weight loss is moderated by level of baseline controlled motivation.

Authors:  Kelly H Webber; Jeanne M Gabriele; Deborah F Tate; Mark B Dignan
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  A comparison of a behavioral weight loss program to a stress management program: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kelly H Webber; Erin M Casey; Lindsey Mayes; Yuriko Katsumata; Laurel Mellin
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.008

10.  Do individual, online motivational interviewing chat sessions enhance weight loss in a group-based, online weight control program?

Authors:  Delia Smith West; Jean R Harvey; Rebecca A Krukowski; T Elaine Prewitt; Jeffrey Priest; Takamaru Ashikaga
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 5.002

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.