Literature DB >> 28601621

A systematic review of peer-supported interventions for health promotion and disease prevention.

Rajeev Ramchand1, Sangeeta C Ahluwalia2, Lea Xenakis1, Eric Apaydin3, Laura Raaen3, Geoffrey Grimm1.   

Abstract

Prior research has examined peer programs with respect to specific peer roles (e.g.; peer support) or specific health/wellness domains (e.g.; exercise/diet), or have aggregated effects across roles and domains. We sought to conduct a systematic review that categorizes and assesses the effects of peer interventions to promote health and wellness by peer role, intervention type, and outcomes. We use evidence mapping to visually catalog and synthesize the existing research. We searched PubMed and WorldCat databases (2005 to 2015) and New York Academy of Medicine Grey Literature Report (1999 to 2016) for English-language randomized control trials. We extracted study design, study participants, type of intervention(s), peer role(s), outcomes assessed and measures used, and effects from 116 randomized controlled trials. Maps were created to provide a visual display of the evidence by intervention type, peer role, outcome type, and significant vs null or negative effects. There are more null than positive effects across peer interventions, with notable exceptions: group-based interventions that use peers as educators or group facilitators commonly improve knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions; peer educators also commonly improved social health/connectedness and engagement. Dyadic peer support influenced behavior change and peer counseling shows promising effects on physical health outcomes. Programs seeking to use peers in public health campaigns can use evidence maps to identify interventions that have previously demonstrated beneficial effects. Those seeking to produce health outcomes may benefit from identifying the mechanisms by which they expect their program to produce these effects and associated proximal outcomes for future evaluations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: Although we attempted to register our protocol with PROSPERO, we did not meet eligibility criteria because we were past the data collection phase. The full PROSPERO-aligned protocol is available from the authors.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Peer group; Peer influence; Review

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28601621     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  24 in total

Review 1.  A scoping review of peer-led interventions following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Linda Barclay; Gillean Mary Hilton
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Influence and involvement of support people in adolescent and young adult HIV testing.

Authors:  Jillian Neary; Anjuli D Wagner; Cyrus Mugo; Peter M Mutiti; David Bukusi; Grace C John-Stewart; Dalton C Wamalwa; Pamela K Kohler; Jennifer A Slyker
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2018-09-27

3.  Eliciting the Social Determinants of Cancer Prevention and Control in the Catchment of an Urban Cancer Center.

Authors:  Katerina Jou; Madeline R Sterling; Rosio Ramos; Francesse Antoine; David M Nanus; Erica Phillips
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 1.847

4.  Volunteer engagement to inform research on cardiovascular health awareness, Canada.

Authors:  Marie-Thérèse Lussier; Janusz Kaczorowski; Magali Girard; Emmanuelle Arpin
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.483

5.  The Power of the Shared Experience: MTN-020/ASPIRE Trial Participants' Descriptions of Peer Influence on Acceptability of and Adherence to the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring for HIV Prevention.

Authors:  Ariana W K Katz; K Naidoo; K Reddy; M Chitukuta; J Nabukeera; S Siva; C Zimba; E T Montgomery
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2020-08

6.  Engagement and outcomes in a digital Diabetes Prevention Program: 3-year update.

Authors:  S Cameron Sepah; Luohua Jiang; Robert J Ellis; Kelly McDermott; Anne L Peters
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2017-09-07

7.  Online cognitive-behavioral based group interventions for adolescents with chronic illness and parents: study protocol of two multicenter randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Miriam Douma; Linde Scholten; Heleen Maurice-Stam; Martha A Grootenhuis
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.125

8.  The effectiveness of peer-supported interventions for encouraging dietary behaviour change in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah E Moore; Megan McMullan; Claire T McEvoy; Michelle C McKinley; Jayne V Woodside
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.022

9.  Peer-to-peer health promotion interventions among African American men: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Guillermo M Wippold; Sarah Grace Frary; Demetrius Abshire; Dawn K Wilson
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-22

10.  Behavior-Specific Cognitions Moderate Rural Women's Responsiveness to Web-Based Interventions for Weight Loss.

Authors:  Kevin A Kupzyk; Bunny Pozehl; Carol H Pullen; Patricia A Hageman
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.