BACKGROUND: HIV self-tests increase HIV status awareness by providing convenience and privacy, although cost and access may limit use. Since 2015, the New York City (NYC) Health Department has conducted 5 waves of an online Home Test Giveaway. METHODS: We recruited adult cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender and gender-nonconforming (TGNC) individuals who had sex with men, who were living in NYC, not previously HIV diagnosed, and using paid digital advertisements (4-8 weeks per wave). Eligible respondents were e-mailed a code to redeem on the manufacturer's website for a free HIV self-test and an online follow-up survey ~2 months later. For key process and outcome measures, we present means across 5 waves. RESULTS: Across the 5 waves of Home Test Giveaway, there were 28,921 responses to the eligibility questionnaire: 17,383 were eligible, 12,182 redeemed a code for a free HIV self-test, and 7935 responded to the follow-up survey (46% of eligible responses). Among eligible responses, approximately half were Latino/a (mean, 32%) or non-Latino/a, black (mean, 17%). Mean report of never testing before was 16%. Among 5903 follow-up survey responses who reported test use, 32 reported reactive results with no known previous diagnosis (0.54%), of whom 78% reported receiving confirmatory testing. Report of likelihood of recommending the Home Test Giveaway to friends was high (mean, 96%). CONCLUSIONS: We recruited diverse NYC MSM and TGNC and distributed a large number of HIV self-tests to them. Among respondents who reported newly reactive tests, the majority reported confirmatory testing. This seems to be one acceptable way to reach MSM and TGNC for HIV testing, including those who have never tested before.
BACKGROUND: HIV self-tests increase HIV status awareness by providing convenience and privacy, although cost and access may limit use. Since 2015, the New York City (NYC) Health Department has conducted 5 waves of an online Home Test Giveaway. METHODS: We recruited adult cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender and gender-nonconforming (TGNC) individuals who had sex with men, who were living in NYC, not previously HIV diagnosed, and using paid digital advertisements (4-8 weeks per wave). Eligible respondents were e-mailed a code to redeem on the manufacturer's website for a free HIV self-test and an online follow-up survey ~2 months later. For key process and outcome measures, we present means across 5 waves. RESULTS: Across the 5 waves of Home Test Giveaway, there were 28,921 responses to the eligibility questionnaire: 17,383 were eligible, 12,182 redeemed a code for a free HIV self-test, and 7935 responded to the follow-up survey (46% of eligible responses). Among eligible responses, approximately half were Latino/a (mean, 32%) or non-Latino/a, black (mean, 17%). Mean report of never testing before was 16%. Among 5903 follow-up survey responses who reported test use, 32 reported reactive results with no known previous diagnosis (0.54%), of whom 78% reported receiving confirmatory testing. Report of likelihood of recommending the Home Test Giveaway to friends was high (mean, 96%). CONCLUSIONS: We recruited diverse NYC MSM and TGNC and distributed a large number of HIV self-tests to them. Among respondents who reported newly reactive tests, the majority reported confirmatory testing. This seems to be one acceptable way to reach MSM and TGNC for HIV testing, including those who have never tested before.
Authors: Sheri A Lippman; Lissa Moran; Jae Sevelius; Leslie S Castillo; Angel Ventura; Sarah Treves-Kagan; Susan Buchbinder Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2016-04
Authors: Muhammad S Jamil; Garrett Prestage; Christopher K Fairley; Andrew E Grulich; Kirsty S Smith; Marcus Chen; Martin Holt; Anna M McNulty; Benjamin R Bavinton; Damian P Conway; Handan Wand; Phillip Keen; Jack Bradley; Johann Kolstee; Colin Batrouney; Darren Russell; Matthew Law; John M Kaldor; Rebecca J Guy Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Christian Grov; Drew A Westmoreland; Pedro B Carneiro; Matthew Stief; Caitlin MacCrate; Chloe Mirzayi; David W Pantalone; Viraj V Patel; Denis Nash Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2019-05-16 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Marguerita A Lightfoot; Chadwick K Campbell; Nicholas Moss; Sarah Treves-Kagan; Emily Agnew; Mi-Suk Kang Dufour; Hyman Scott; Aria M Saʼid; Sheri A Lippman Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Robert W Marlin; Sean D Young; Claire C Bristow; Greg Wilson; Jeffrey Rodriguez; Jose Ortiz; Rhea Mathew; Jeffrey D Klausner Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Amy Nunn; Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein; Jennifer Rose; Kenneth Mayer; Thomas Stopka; Caitlin Towey; Julia Harvey; Karina Santamaria; Kelly Sabatino; Stacey Trooskin; Philip A Chan Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Patrick S Sullivan; Robert Driggers; Joanne D Stekler; Aaron Siegler; Tamar Goldenberg; Sarah J McDougal; Jason Caucutt; Jeb Jones; Rob Stephenson Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Joseph A Catania; Jeffrey Martin; M Margaret Dolcini; E Roberto Orellana; Jeffrey Henne Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Deven T Hamilton; David A Katz; Wei Luo; Joanne D Stekler; Eli S Rosenberg; Patrick S Sullivan; Steven M Goodreau; Susan Cassels Journal: Epidemics Date: 2021-10-28 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Paul Kobrak; Robert H Remien; Julie E Myers; Paul Salcuni; Zoe Edelstein; Benjamin Tsoi; Theodorus Sandfort Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2022-05-10