Marguerita A Lightfoot1, Chadwick K Campbell1, Nicholas Moss2, Sarah Treves-Kagan1,3, Emily Agnew1, Mi-Suk Kang Dufour1, Hyman Scott4, Aria M Saʼid1, Sheri A Lippman1. 1. Division of Prevention Sciences, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 2. Division of Communicable Disease Control & Prevention, Alameda County Public Health Department, Oakland, CA. 3. Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. 4. Bridge HIV, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Men who have sex with men (MSM) continue to be disproportionately impacted globally by the HIV epidemic. Studies suggest that HIV self-testing (HIVST) is highly acceptable among MSM. Social network strategies to increase testing are effective in reaching MSM, particularly MSM of color, who may not otherwise test. We tested a social network-based strategy to distribute HIVST kits to African American MSM (AAMSM) and Latino MSM (LMSM). SETTING: This study was conducted in Alameda County, California, a large, urban/suburban county with an HIV epidemic mirroring the national HIV epidemic. METHODS: From January 2016 to March 2017, 30 AAMSM, LMSM, and transgender women were trained as peer recruiters and asked to distribute 5 self-test kits to MSM social network members and support those who test positive in linking to care. Testers completed an online survey after their test. We compared peer-distributed HIVST testing outcomes to outcomes from Alameda County's targeted, community-based HIV testing programs using χ tests. RESULTS: Peer-distributed HIVST to 143 social and sexual network members, of whom 110 completed the online survey. Compared with MSM who used the County's sponsored testing programs, individuals reached through the peer-based self-testing strategy were significantly more likely to have never tested for HIV (3.51% vs. 0.41%, P < 0.01) and to report a positive test result (6.14% vs. 1.49%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that a network-based strategy for self-test distribution is a promising intervention to increase testing uptake and reduce undiagnosed infections among AAMSM and LMSM.
BACKGROUND:Men who have sex with men (MSM) continue to be disproportionately impacted globally by the HIV epidemic. Studies suggest that HIV self-testing (HIVST) is highly acceptable among MSM. Social network strategies to increase testing are effective in reaching MSM, particularly MSM of color, who may not otherwise test. We tested a social network-based strategy to distribute HIVST kits to African American MSM (AAMSM) and Latino MSM (LMSM). SETTING: This study was conducted in Alameda County, California, a large, urban/suburban county with an HIV epidemic mirroring the national HIV epidemic. METHODS: From January 2016 to March 2017, 30 AAMSM, LMSM, and transgender women were trained as peer recruiters and asked to distribute 5 self-test kits to MSM social network members and support those who test positive in linking to care. Testers completed an online survey after their test. We compared peer-distributed HIVST testing outcomes to outcomes from Alameda County's targeted, community-based HIV testing programs using χ tests. RESULTS: Peer-distributed HIVST to 143 social and sexual network members, of whom 110 completed the online survey. Compared with MSM who used the County's sponsored testing programs, individuals reached through the peer-based self-testing strategy were significantly more likely to have never tested for HIV (3.51% vs. 0.41%, P < 0.01) and to report a positive test result (6.14% vs. 1.49%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that a network-based strategy for self-test distribution is a promising intervention to increase testing uptake and reduce undiagnosed infections among AAMSM and LMSM.
Authors: Zoe R Edelstein; Amanda Wahnich; Lawrence J Purpura; Paul M Salcuni; Benjamin W Tsoi; Paul H Kobrak; Paul A Santos; Adriana Andaluz; Jennifer H MacGregor; Jennifer D M Matsuki; David A Katz; Demetre C Daskalakis; Julie E Myers Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Eline Op de Coul; Chantal den Daas; Ralph Spijker; Titia Heijman; Marvin de Vos; Hannelore Götz; Koenraad Vermey; Wim Zuilhof; Jossy Van den Boogaard; Udi Davidovich; Freke Zuure Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2020-02-09
Authors: Jessie K Edwards; Peter Arimi; Freddie Ssengooba; Michael E Herce; Grace Mulholland; Milissa Markiewicz; Susan Babirye; Steven Ssendagire; Sharon S Weir Journal: AIDS Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 4.632