Literature DB >> 32148635

The Relationship Between Physical Characteristics and Maximal Strength in Men Practicing the Back Squat, the Bench Press and the Deadlift.

Pierre-Marc Ferland1,2, Alexander Pollock2, Ryan Swope2, Mark Ryan2, Michael Reeder2, Kristin Heumann2, Alain Steve Comtois1.   

Abstract

This study was designed to quantify the relationships between physical characteristics and maximal strength in the back squat, the bench press and the deadlift on powerlifters and football players. Eighteen male junior drug-tested classic powerlifters and seventeen NCAA Division II American football players' anthropometric measurements were taken to compare them with maximal strength results from either a powerlifting meet or testing from their supervised strength and conditioning program. Pearson's bivariate correlations analysis revealed (statistical significance was set at p<0.05) that individuals with a greater (Wilks points) back squat, generally presented a higher Bodyweight (BW) (r=0.37), Body Mass Index (BMI) (r=0.45), Bodyfat Percentage (BF%) (r=0.36), Hip (r=0.41), Waist (r=0.35) and Torso (r=0.41) Circumference (C), Hip C/Height (r=0.46), Waist C/Height (r=0.39) and Torso C/Height (r=0.45) ratios. The individuals with a greater bench press generally presented a higher BMI (r=0.37), Lean Body Weight (LBW) (r=0.36), Hip C (r=0.39) and Hip C/Height ratio (r=0.39). On the other hand, individuals with a greater deadlift were generally older (r=0.34), shorter (r=-0.41), had shorter thighs (r=-0.52) and trunks (r=-0.36), smaller Thigh Length (L)/Height ratio (r=-0.44), Waist C/Hip C (r=-0.41) and Thigh L/Lower Leg L (r=-0.53) ratios, but a higher Lower Leg L/Height ratio (r=-046). The results of this study should be utilized by strength and conditioning coaches to deepen their comprehension of their athletes' physical characteristics in order to help them develop strength through their advantages. Further research should focus on evaluating how physical characteristics affect performance in different squat, bench, and deadlift stances.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body composition; anthropometry; conventional deadlift; sumo deadlift

Year:  2020        PMID: 32148635      PMCID: PMC7039481     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci        ISSN: 1939-795X


  25 in total

1.  Anthropometry increases 1 repetition maximum predictive ability of NFL-225 test for Division IA college football players.

Authors:  Ronald K Hetzler; Brian L Schroeder; Jennifer J Wages; Christopher D Stickley; Iris F Kimura
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Anthropometric dimensions do not enhance one repetition maximum prediction from the NFL-225 test in college football players.

Authors:  Jerry L Mayhew; Jeff A Jacques; John S Ware; Paul P Chapman; Michael G Bemben; Tom E Ward; Joseph P Slovak
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Relationships of structural dimensions to bench press strength in college males.

Authors:  J L Mayhew; T E Ball; T E Ward; C L Hart; M D Arnold
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  Relationship between lifting performance and skeletal muscle mass in elite powerlifters.

Authors:  X Ye; J P Loenneke; C A Fahs; L M Rossow; R S Thiebaud; D Kim; M G Bemben; T Abe
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Relationship between countermovement jump performance and multijoint isometric and dynamic tests of strength.

Authors:  James L Nuzzo; Jeffrey M McBride; Prue Cormie; Grant O McCaulley
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Relationship between maximal squat strength and five, ten, and forty yard sprint times.

Authors:  Jeffrey M McBride; Daniel Blow; Tyler J Kirby; Tracie L Haines; Andrea M Dayne; N Travis Triplett
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Anthropometric profile of powerlifters: differences as a function of bodyweight class and competitive success.

Authors:  M Lovera; J Keogh
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Validation of the Wilks powerlifting formula.

Authors:  P M Vanderburgh; A M Batterham
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  The relationship between body composition measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and maximal strength in classic powerlifting.

Authors:  Pierre-Marc Ferland; Fanie St-Jean Miron; Antoine Laurier; Alain S Comtois
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 1.637

10.  Anthropometric correlates with strength performance among resistance trained athletes.

Authors:  J L Mayhew; F C Piper; J S Ware
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.637

View more
  4 in total

1.  Relationships Between Anthropometry and Maximal Strength in Male Classic Powerlifters.

Authors:  Pierre-Marc Ferland; Antoine Laurier; Alain Steve Comtois
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

2.  Predicting muscular strength using demographics, skeletal dimensions, and body composition measures.

Authors:  Sean T Stanelle; Stephen F Crouse; Tyler R Heimdal; Steven E Riechman; Alexandra L Remy; Bradley S Lambert
Journal:  Sports Med Health Sci       Date:  2021-02-15

3.  Lung Function and Respiratory Muscle Adaptations of Endurance- and Strength-Trained Males.

Authors:  Daniel A Hackett
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-10

4.  Acute effects of high-volume compared to low-volume resistance exercise on lung function.

Authors:  Daniel Hackett
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2020-10-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.