Literature DB >> 10613442

Validation of the Wilks powerlifting formula.

P M Vanderburgh1, A M Batterham.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Because maximal strength varies with body mass, the International Powerlifting Federation (IPF) has adopted a method of adjusting powerlifting events (bench press, BP; squat, SQ; deadlift, DL, and total lift (the sum of BP, DL, and SQ), TOT) by body mass. This method, the Wilks formula, multiplies one's lift by an index based on body mass so that lifters of different size can be compared on the same event. The Wilks formula is not, however, based on published data and has yet to be critically evaluated. The purpose of this investigation, then, was to validate the Wilks formula.
METHODS: This was performed by 1) examining residuals bias to verify that the adjusted score does, in fact, lead to no systematic bias based on body mass and 2) by applying a more theoretically supportable allometric model to the same data and comparing the fit with the Wilks approach. Subjects were the current men's and women's world record holders as well as the top two performers for each event in the IPF's 1996 and 1997 World Championships (a total of 30 men and 27 women for each lift).
RESULTS: Results of data analysis regarding the Wilks formula indicate that: 1) there is no bias for men's or women's BP and TOT; 2) there is a favorable bias toward intermediate weight class lifters in the women's SQ with no bias for men's SQ; and 3) there is a linear unfavorable bias toward heavier men and women in the DL. Furthermore, the allometric approach indicated a bias against light and heavy men and women which may be considered acceptable given that half as many lifters are found in the lightest and heaviest weight classes as in the intermediate weight classes.
CONCLUSION: As used currently (BP and TOT only), the Wilks formula appears to be a valid method to adjust powerlifting scores by body mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10613442     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199912000-00027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  6 in total

1.  Relationships Between Anthropometry and Maximal Strength in Male Classic Powerlifters.

Authors:  Pierre-Marc Ferland; Antoine Laurier; Alain Steve Comtois
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 2.  On self-propagating methodological flaws in performance normalization for strength and power sports.

Authors:  Ognjen Arandjelović
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The Relationship Between Physical Characteristics and Maximal Strength in Men Practicing the Back Squat, the Bench Press and the Deadlift.

Authors:  Pierre-Marc Ferland; Alexander Pollock; Ryan Swope; Mark Ryan; Michael Reeder; Kristin Heumann; Alain Steve Comtois
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-02-01

4.  RPE vs. Percentage 1RM Loading in Periodized Programs Matched for Sets and Repetitions.

Authors:  Eric R Helms; Ryan K Byrnes; Daniel M Cooke; Michael H Haischer; Joseph P Carzoli; Trevor K Johnson; Matthew R Cross; John B Cronin; Adam G Storey; Michael C Zourdos
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Prevalence and Consequences of Injuries in Powerlifting: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Edit Strömbäck; Ulrika Aasa; Kajsa Gilenstam; Lars Berglund
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-05-14

6.  Thoracolumbar And Lumbopelvic Spinal Alignment During The Deadlift Exercise: A Comparison Between Men And Women.

Authors:  Victor Bengtsson; Ulrika Aasa; Fredrik Öhberg; Lars Berglund
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-10-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.