Literature DB >> 20453681

Anthropometry increases 1 repetition maximum predictive ability of NFL-225 test for Division IA college football players.

Ronald K Hetzler1, Brian L Schroeder, Jennifer J Wages, Christopher D Stickley, Iris F Kimura.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare existing 1 repetition maximum (1RM) bench press prediction equations in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division IA college football players and determine if the error associated with the prediction of 1RM bench press from the National Football League (NFL)-225 test could be reduced through the addition of anthropometric measurements. Anthropometric measures, 1RM bench press, NFL-225 test repetitions to fatigue, and body composition data were collected on 87 Division IA football players (mean+/-SD age 19.9+/-1.3 years; height 182.3+/-7.3 cm; body mass 102.3+/-21.1 kg; % fat 13.9+/-6.7; 1RM bench press 140.5+/-2 6.6 kg; and NFL-225 reps to fatigue 14.1+/-8.0). Hierarchical regression revealed an R=0.87 when predicting 1RM from the NFL-225 test alone, which improved to R=0.90 with the addition of the anthropometric variables: arm circumference and arm length. The following equation was the best performing model to predict 1RM bench press: 1RM (lb)=299.08+2.47 arm circumference (cm)--4.60 arm length (cm)+5.84 reps @ 225; SEE=18.3 lb). This equation predicted 43.7% of subjects' within +/-10 lb of their actual 1RM bench press. Using a crossvalidation group, the equation resulted in estimates of 1RM which were not significantly different than the actual 1RM. Because of the variability that has been shown to be associated with 1RM prediction equations, the use of actual 1RM testing is recommended when this is a critical variable. However, coaches, scouts, and athletes, who choose to estimate 1RM bench press using repetitions to failure from the NFL-225 test, may benefit from the use of the equations developed in this study to estimate 1RM bench press with the inclusion of simple anthropometric measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20453681     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d682fa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  Relationships Between Anthropometry and Maximal Strength in Male Classic Powerlifters.

Authors:  Pierre-Marc Ferland; Antoine Laurier; Alain Steve Comtois
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 2.  A brief review of strength and ballistic assessment methodologies in sport.

Authors:  Daniel Travis McMaster; Nicholas Gill; John Cronin; Michael McGuigan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The Relationship Between Physical Characteristics and Maximal Strength in Men Practicing the Back Squat, the Bench Press and the Deadlift.

Authors:  Pierre-Marc Ferland; Alexander Pollock; Ryan Swope; Mark Ryan; Michael Reeder; Kristin Heumann; Alain Steve Comtois
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-02-01

4.  Predicting muscular strength using demographics, skeletal dimensions, and body composition measures.

Authors:  Sean T Stanelle; Stephen F Crouse; Tyler R Heimdal; Steven E Riechman; Alexandra L Remy; Bradley S Lambert
Journal:  Sports Med Health Sci       Date:  2021-02-15

5.  Single- and Multi-Joint Maximum Weight Lifting Relationship to Free-Fat Mass in Different Exercises for Upper- and Lower-Limbs in Well-Trained Male Young Adults.

Authors:  Danilo A Massini; Anderson G Macedo; Tiago A F Almeida; Mário C Espada; Fernando J Santos; Eliane A Castro; Daniel C P Ferreira; Cassiano M Neiva; Dalton M Pessôa Filho
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Comparison of anthropometric characteristics between professional triathletes and cyclists.

Authors:  L Brunkhorst; H Kielstein
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 2.806

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.