Literature DB >> 32147466

The Learning Curve for Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour: How Many is Enough to be Independent, Safe and Effective Surgeon?

Sławomir Poletajew1, Wojciech Krajewski2, Krystian Kaczmarek3, Bartłomiej Kopczyński4, Remigiusz Stamirowski3, Andrzej Tukiendorf5, Romuald Zdrojowy6, Marcin Słojewski3, Piotr Radziszewski4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TURBT) is one the most common urological procedures. It is also one the fundamental surgeries performed by residents. The learning curve (LC) for TUR has never been analysed. The aim of the study was to analyse the learning curve of TURBT in a residency setting. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective multicentre analysis of prospectively maintained databases enrolled 993 consecutive TURBTs performed by 10 urology residents in 3 academic institutions. Study end-points were as follows: the absence of muscularis propria in a specimen, any intra- or postoperative surgical complication and 3-month recurrence-free survival.
RESULTS: With increasing experience, residents operated more complex cases defined by higher rate of large, multifocal or high-risk tumours. In the same time, surgery time, postoperative catheterization time and hospital stay became shorter. An improvement has been noticed regarding the muscularis propria sampling and 3-month recurrence-free survival, but not regarding the risk of surgical complications. Evident improvement in study end-points was noticed after 101 operations; surgeons achieved the best clinical outcomes after performing 170 procedures, whereas the poorest results for the first 45 operations.
CONCLUSIONS: TURBT has a flat LC with 100 cases being the absolute minimum for a resident in training to achieve acceptable oncological and surgical outcomes.
Copyright © 2020 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bladder cancer; learning curve; residency; surgical complications; transurethral resection

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32147466     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  5 in total

Review 1.  Recurrence mechanisms of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer - a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh; Ashish M Kamat; Peter C Black; Petros Grivas; Shahrokh F Shariat; Marek Babjuk
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 16.430

2.  Bladder cancer histological variants: which parameters could predict the concordance between transurethral resection of bladder tumor and radical cystectomy specimens?

Authors:  Guglielmo Mantica; Stefano Tappero; Stefano Parodi; Nataniele Piol; Bruno Spina; Rafaela Malinaric; Federica Balzarini; Marco Borghesi; André Van Der Merwe; Nazareno Suardi; Carlo Terrone
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-09-09

3.  National Implementation of Simulator Training Improves Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumours in Patients.

Authors:  Sarah H Bube; Pernille S Kingo; Mia G Madsen; Juan L Vásquez; Thomas Norus; Rikke G Olsen; Claus Dahl; Rikke B Hansen; Lars Konge; Nessn Azawi
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-01

4.  Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall.

Authors:  Sławomir Poletajew; Tomasz Ilczuk; Wojciech Krajewski; Grzegorz Niemczyk; Agata Cyran; Łukasz Białek; Piotr Radziszewski; Barbara Górnicka; Piotr Kryst
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Soft Urinary Bladder Phantom for Endoscopic Training.

Authors:  Eunjin Choi; Frank Waldbillig; Moonkwang Jeong; Dandan Li; Rahul Goyal; Patricia Weber; Arkadiusz Miernik; Britta Grüne; Simon Hein; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Maximilian Christian Kriegmair; Tian Qiu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.934

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.