| Literature DB >> 34002287 |
Eunjin Choi1,2, Frank Waldbillig3,4, Moonkwang Jeong1,2, Dandan Li1,2, Rahul Goyal1,2, Patricia Weber1, Arkadiusz Miernik4,5, Britta Grüne3,4, Simon Hein4,5, Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola4,5, Maximilian Christian Kriegmair3,4, Tian Qiu6,7.
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) is the main disease in the urinary tract with a high recurrence rate and it is diagnosed by cystoscopy (CY). To train the CY procedures, a realistic bladder phantom with correct anatomy and physiological properties is highly required. Here, we report a soft bladder phantom (FlexBlad) that mimics many important features of a human bladder. Under filling, it shows a large volume expansion of more than 300% with a tunable compliance in the range of 12.2 ± 2.8 - 32.7 ± 5.4 mL cmH2O-1 by engineering the thickness of the bladder wall. By 3D printing and multi-step molding, detailed anatomical structures are represented on the inner bladder wall, including sub-millimeter blood vessels and reconfigurable bladder tumors. Endoscopic inspection and tumor biopsy were successfully performed. A multi-center study was carried out, where two groups of urologists with different experience levels executed consecutive CYs in the phantom and filled in questionnaires. The learning curves reveal that the FlexBlad has a positive effect in the endourological training across different skill levels. The statistical results validate the usability of the phantom as a valuable educational tool, and the dynamic feature expands its use as a versatile endoscopic training platform.Entities:
Keywords: Cystoscopy; Endourology; Medical education; Organ phantom; Surgical simulation; Tumor biopsy
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34002287 PMCID: PMC8455490 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-021-02793-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Biomed Eng ISSN: 0090-6964 Impact factor: 3.934
Figure 1Schematic of the workflow to develop the soft bladder phantom for the endoscopic training.
Figure 2Fabrication process of the bladder phantom. (a–c) schematics of the cross-sectional view of the two-step molding process, and (d–f) photos of the corresponding steps.
Figure 3Mimicking the compliance of real human bladders. (a) large volume expansion imaged using X-ray, (b) the pressure–volume curve at different wall thickness of the phantom, and (c) the compliance of the bladder phantom covers different states of the bladder.
Figure 4Comparison of the endoscopic view of the real bladder (upper panel) and the bladder phantom (lower panel). The arrows indicate the position of the deformed bladder dorm in (c) and (d), and the tumors in (e) and (f).
Figure 5Reconfigurable bladder tumor in the phantom for endoscopic training. (a) Schematic illustration of changing the tumor’s position inside the phantom using an external magnet; (b–d) Sequential snapshots of the biopsy simulation of a papillary tumor on the bladder wall using forceps through the tool channel of an endoscope.
Figure 6Survey results of the bladder phantom for endoscopy using a 5-point Likert scale on seven aspects to verify the realization of important features on the phantoms to be used as a medical tool (n = 16). The results indicate that most subjects agree that the FlexBlad is a valuable surgical training tool.
Figure 7Comparison of the execution time for cystoscopy simulation by two groups of different skilled surgeons for construct validity (CsV) over four times attempts (n = 16), ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.