| Literature DB >> 34729225 |
Guglielmo Mantica1, Stefano Tappero1, Stefano Parodi1, Nataniele Piol2, Bruno Spina2, Rafaela Malinaric1, Federica Balzarini1, Marco Borghesi1, André Van Der Merwe3, Nazareno Suardi1, Carlo Terrone1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The concordance rate of bladder cancer (BCa) histological variants (HV) between transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and radical cystectomy (RC) is sub-optimal and is unclear which factors may influence it. The aim of this study was to identify factors that may be correlated to a higher TURBT-RC concordance rate.Entities:
Keywords: bladder cancer; histological variants; mixed variants; radical cystectomy; urothelial bladder cancer
Year: 2021 PMID: 34729225 PMCID: PMC8552936 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2021.140.R1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cent European J Urol ISSN: 2080-4806
Baseline characteristics
| Total 81 | Concordance Group 49 (60.5) | No Concordance Group 32 (39.5) | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLINICAL FACTORS | Gender, n (%) | 0.679 | |||
| Age, median (IQR) | 73 (66–78) | 72 (66.5–77) | 73.5 (64–78.8) | 0.254 | |
| TURBT | / | ||||
| pT TURBT | 0.384 | ||||
| pT RC, n (%) | 0.472 | ||||
| Dmax, mm median (IQR) | 30 (24–46.5) | 37 (25–50) | 25 (20–40) | 0.172 | |
| BCa recurrency, n (%) | 0.143 | ||||
| Tumor focality, n (%) | 0.132 | ||||
| RC histopathology, n (%) | 0.153 | ||||
| SURGICAL FACTORS | Number of specimens, n (%) | 0.313 | |||
| MCL, n (%) | 0.012 | ||||
| MCL, mm median (IQR) (continuous) | 10 (8 – 12) | 12.5 (10–15) | 10 (7–10) | 0.014 | |
| Execution of reTURBT, n (%) | 0.919 | ||||
| §histological variant detection at, n (%) | / | ||||
| Source of energy, n (%) | 0.680 | ||||
| Fragmentation rate, median (IQR) | 0.48 (0.24 – 0.75) | 0.40 (0.17 – 0.65) | 0.63 (0.36 – 0.84) | 0.547 | |
| Surgeons experience | 0.332 |
n – number; IQR – interquartile range; BCa – bladder cancer; TURBT – transurethral resection of bladder tumor; TCC – transitional cell carcinoma; NEE – neuroendocrine; Dmax – maximal bidimensional diameter of bladder tumor at preoperative imaging (computed tomography scan and/or ultrasonography); MCL – maximal core length; RC – radical cystectomy; fragmentation rate – Dmax / number of specimens
The TURBT is meant as the worst pre-RC TURBT (either first TURBT or reTURBT). Worst is meant as the higher pT stage or the presence of histologic variant or both
In case of re-TURBT, the re-TURBT and the corresponding previous TURBT were performed by the same surgeon
Univariate analysis
| OR, CI 95% | p | |
|---|---|---|
| MCL | ||
| MCL (continuous variable) | 1.15 (1.02–0.29) | 0.021 |
| Dmax | 1.02 (0.99–1.05) | 0.139 |
| BCa recurrence | ||
| Tumor focality | ||
| Source of energy | ||
| Number of specimens (continuous) | 1.01 (1.00–1.01) | 0.508 |
| Fragmentation rate (continuous) | 0.40 (0.16–1.01) | 0.052 |
| Surgeons’ experience | ||
| Performance of reTURBT |
MCL – maximal core length; OR – odds ratio; CI – confidence interval; Dmax – maximal bidimensional diameter of bladder tumor at preoperative imaging (computed tomography scan and/or ultrasonography); BCa – bladder cancer; TURBT - transurethral resection of bladder tumor
UVA (dependent variable = concordance yes)
Multivariate analysis
| OR, CI 95% | p | |
|---|---|---|
| MCL | ||
| Fragmentation rate (continuous variable) | 0.56 (0.22–1.42) | 0.221 |
| BCa recurrency | ||
| Tumor focality |
MCL – maximal core length; OR – odds ratio; CI – confidence interval; BCa – bladder cancer
MVA (dependent variable = concordance yes)