| Literature DB >> 32146776 |
Saeideh Hamidian1, Ali Reza Talebi2,3, Farzaneh Fesahat4, Mohammad Bayat1, Ali Mohammad Mirjalili1, Hamid Reza Ashrafzadeh3, Mahya Rajabi5, Fateme Montazeri3, Saeid Babaei1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Since sperm abnormalities are known to be a major reason for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), any defects in DNA structure and chromatin condensation can place embryos at risk in the early stage of development and implantation. As antioxidants such as vitamin C may play a protective role against the destruction of protamine genes in sperm chromatin, this study was conducted to evaluate the effects of vitamin C on chromatin and the expression of protamine genes in the male partners of couples with RPL.Entities:
Keywords: Clinical trial; Gene expression; Protamines; Recurrent pregnancy loss; Spermatozoa; Vitamin C
Year: 2020 PMID: 32146776 PMCID: PMC7127905 DOI: 10.5653/cerm.2019.03188
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Reprod Med ISSN: 2093-8896
Figure 1.Visualization of sperm morphology using the Diff-Quick staining method. a, sperm with normal morphology; b, abnormal sperm morphology (60 × 47 mm; 120 × 120 DPI). Magnification, × 1,000.
Figure 2.Assessment of sperm protamine deficiency using chromomycin A3 (CMA3) staining. a, normal chromatin seen as dark yellow; b, CMA3+ protamine shown as bright yellow (70 × 57 mm; 120 × 120 DPI). Magnification, × 1,000.
Figure 3.Evaluation of apoptosis in sperm by a TUNEL assay. a, sperm with normal DNA; b, sperm with high DNA fragmentation (TUNEL+; 93 × 43 mm; 120 × 120 DPI). TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling.
Oligonucleotide primers
| Accession No. | Gene | Primer sequence (5'-3') | PCR product (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NM_002761.2 | F: AGA GCC GGA GCA GAT ATT ACC | 119 | |
| R: TCT ACA TCG CGG TCT GTA CCT | |||
| NM_002762.3 | F: ATC CAC AGG CGG CAG CAT C | 144 | |
| R: TTC CAG CTG GGG GTG AGG GG | |||
| NM_004048.2 | F: AGA TGA GTA TGC CTG CCG TG | 106 | |
| R: TGC GGC ATC TTC AAA CCT C |
PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PMN1, protamine P1; PMN2, protamine P2, B2M; beta-2-microglobulin; F, forward; R, reverse.
Comparison of clinical data between the intervention and control groups before treatment with vitamin C
| Hormone | Case | Control | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FSH (mIU/mL) | 11.92 ± 0.39 | 13.35 ± 0.78 | 0.111 |
| LH (mIU/mL) | 25.37 ± 3.16 | 28.43 ± 4.09 | 0.557 |
| PRL (mIU/mL) | 10.9 ± 0.83 | 12.9 ± 1.15 | 0.167 |
| AMH (ng/mL) | 2.38 ± 0.14 | 2.82 ± 0.18 | 0.580 |
Values are presented as mean±standard error, and p-values <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.
Case, female couples with recurrent pregnancy loss in the intervention group, in whom the relevant sex hormones were measured at the beginning of the study; Control, female couples of normozoospermic men, in whom the relevant sex hormones were measured at the beginning of the study; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; PRL, prolactin; AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone.
Clinical characteristics of couples with recurrent pregnancy loss
| Patient No. | Before treatment | After treatment (3 mo) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duration of infertility (yr) | No. of abortions | Cycle (N/A) | Clinical pregnancy (+/–) | Live birth (+/–) | Abortion (+/–) | |
| 1 | 4 | 2 | N | + | + | – |
| 2 | 9 | 2 | A | + | + | – |
| 3 | 12 | 3 | N | + | –[ | – |
| 4 | 10 | 2 | A | + | + | – |
| 5 | 8 | 2 | A | + | – | + |
| 6 | 12 | 5 | A | + | + | – |
| 7 | 7 | 3 | A | + | Ongoing | – |
| 8 | 10 | 3 | A | – | – | – |
| 9 | 5 | 2 | A | + | – | + |
| 10 | 6 | 3 | N | + | Ongoing | – |
| 11 | 7 | 2 | A | + | Ongoing | – |
| 12 | 5 | 3 | A | – | – | – |
| 13 | 4 | 2 | A | – | – | – |
| 14 | 8 | 2 | A | + | – | + |
| 15 | 10 | 3 | - | – | – | – |
| 16 | 8 | 2 | - | – | – | – |
| 17 | 12 | 3 | A | + | – | + |
| 18 | 9 | 2 | - | – | – | – |
| 19 | 5 | 2 | A | + | + | – |
| 20 | 11 | 3 | A | + | + | – |
N, natural cycle; A, assisted reproductive technology cycle.
Stillbirth.
Effects of vitamin C on sperm concentration and morphology in the intervention and control groups
| Variable | Intervention | Control | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration (× 106/mL) | 107.6 ± 3.55 | ||
| Before treatment | 67.95 ± 3.76 | 0.000 | |
| After treatment | 68.10 ± 3.73 | 0.000 | |
| | 0.97 | - | - |
| Morphology (%) | 8.75 ± 0.35 | ||
| Before treatment | 2.35 ± 0.21 | 0.000 | |
| After treatment | 6.35 ± 0.67 | 0.51 | |
| | 0.000 | - | - |
Values are presented as mean±standard error, and p-values <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Sperm parameters were evaluated according to the World Health Organization criteria (2010) [25]. The paired t-test, analysis of variance, and the Tukey test were used as appropriate given the data distribution.
Intervention, male partners of women with recurrent pregnancy loss; Control, normozoospermia men.
Sperm chromatin and DNA evaluation in the intervention and control groups
| Variable | Intervention | Control | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMA3+ | 24 ± 0.01 | 0.00 | |
| Before treatment | 55 ± 1.94 | ||
| After treatment | 22.40 ± 0.96 | ||
| | 0.00 | - | 0.00 |
| TUNEL+ | 7.4 ± 0.99 | ||
| Before treatment | 20.2 ± 0.97 | 0.65 | |
| After treatment | 8.25 ± 0.49 | 0.76 | |
| | 0.00 | - |
Values are presented as mean±standard error, and p-values <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. The paired t-test and analysis of variance were used as appropriate given the data distribution.
Intervention, male partners of women with recurrent pregnancy loss; Control, normozoospermia men; CMA3, chromomycin A3; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling.
Figure 4.Comparison of relative levels of expression of protamine genes between the intervention and control groups. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation, and p-values < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. The paired t-test and analysis of variance were used. Intervention, male partners of women with recurrent pregnancy loss; Control, normozoospermic men. a)Significant difference between the intervention group before vitamin C treatment and controls (p≤ 0.001); b)Significant difference between before and after treatment with vitamin C (PMN2: p= 0.04 and PMN1/PMN2: p= 0.00); c)Significant difference between the intervention group after treatment with vitamin C and controls (p= 0.00).
Correlations between sperm parameters, chromatin/DNA integrity, and protamine gene expression levels
| Variable | ||
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | ||
| Normal morphology | ||
| TUNEL (+) | ||
| CMA3 (+) | ||
| - | ||
| - |
All nonparametric correlations were obtained using Pearson statistics, and pvalues <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.
PMN1, protamine 1; PMN2, protamine 2; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling; CMA3, chromomycin A3.