Literature DB >> 11451357

Altered protamine 2 expression is uncommon in donors of known fertility, but common among men with poor fertilizing capacity, and may reflect other abnormalities of spermiogenesis.

D T Carrell1, L Liu.   

Abstract

During the spermatid elongation stage of spermiogenesis approximately 85% of sperm nuclear histones are replaced by protamines. Protamines increase the packing ratio of sperm chromatin, presumably facilitating sperm motility and function. In this study we evaluated the incidence of abnormal protamine expression in 75 patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) and 50 donors of known fertility by isolation of sperm nuclear proteins, quantitative gel electrophoresis, and Western blot analysis. In addition, we evaluated the relationship between abnormal protamine expression and semen quality, sperm penetration ability, chromatin stability, and IVF outcome. Seventeen percent (13/75) of IVF patients had no measurable protamine 2 (P2) versus 0% (0/50) of donors of known fertility (P < .005). Sperm penetration rates were decreased in 12 of 13 patients without P2, and mean penetration rates (4.6 +/- 1.2 vs 32.8 +/- 2.9, P < .005), normal morphology (22.4 +/- 3.6 vs 48.7 +/- 4.2, P < .05), and progressive motility (22.3 +/- 2.5 vs 35.4 +/- 2.1, P < .05) were all significantly decreased compared with patients with measurable P2. The mean sperm concentration was not significantly different. The presence of protamine precursor bands was also associated with a diminished penetration capacity (18.4 +/- 2.8 vs 36.7 +/- 3.0, P < .05). Sperm chromatin decondensation following exposure to heparin sulfate was significantly increased in patients without a measurable P2 band. Twelve patients with no measurable P2 underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), with 6 patients (6/12, 50%) becoming pregnant. ICSI fertilization and subsequent embryo cleavage were not different in patients without P2 compared with other patients undergoing ICSI. These data indicate that abnormal sperm protamine levels are a common defect in infertility patients, but not in donors of known fertility. It appears that abnormal protamine levels may reflect defects of late spermiogenesis, including sperm penetration capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11451357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Androl        ISSN: 0196-3635


  44 in total

Review 1.  The role of epigenetics in spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Sezgin Güneş; Tuba Kulaç
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-09

2.  Histone modification signatures in human sperm distinguish clinical abnormalities.

Authors:  Samantha B Schon; Lacey J Luense; Xiaoshi Wang; Marisa S Bartolomei; Christos Coutifaris; Benjamin A Garcia; Shelley L Berger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Sperm DNA damage: clinical significance in the era of assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Armand Zini; Jamie Libman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Antioxidants and sperm DNA damage: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Armand Zini; Maria San Gabriel; Abdulaziz Baazeem
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Sperm chromatin structure assay results after swim-up are related only to embryo quality but not to fertilization and pregnancy rates following IVF.

Authors:  Zhi-Hong Niu; Hui-Juan Shi; Hui-Qin Zhang; Ai-Jun Zhang; Yi-Juan Sun; Yun Feng
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Assessment of sperm chromatin condensation and ploidy status using flow cytometry correlates to fertilization, embryo quality and pregnancy following in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Leandros A Lazaros; Georgios A Vartholomatos; Elissavet G Hatzi; Apostolos I Kaponis; Georgios V Makrydimas; Sophia N Kalantaridou; Nikolaos V Sofikitis; Theodoros Ioannis Stefos; Konstantinos A Zikopoulos; Ioannis A Georgiou
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Paternal factors contributing to embryo quality.

Authors:  Stacy Colaco; Denny Sakkas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Sperm DNA damage in male infertility: etiologies, assays, and outcomes.

Authors:  Ryan T Schulte; Dana A Ohl; Mark Sigman; Gary D Smith
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Genetics and molecular biology of male infertility among Iranian population: an update.

Authors:  Majid Mojarrad; Ehsan Saburi; Alireza Golshan; Meysam Moghbeli
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

10.  Sexual selection drives weak positive selection in protamine genes and high promoter divergence, enhancing sperm competitiveness.

Authors:  Juan Martin-Coello; Hernán Dopazo; Leonardo Arbiza; Juan Ausió; Eduardo R S Roldan; Montserrat Gomendio
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.