Literature DB >> 26109551

Risk of recurrent stillbirth: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kathleen Lamont1, Neil W Scott2, Gareth T Jones1, Sohinee Bhattacharya3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of recurrent stillbirth.
DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies. DATA SOURCES: Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus searched systematically with no restrictions on date, publication, or language to identify relevant studies. Supplementary efforts included searching relevant internet resources as well as hand searching the reference lists of included studies. Where published information was unclear or inadequate, corresponding authors were contacted for more information. STUDY SELECTION: Cohort and case-control studies from high income countries were potentially eligible if they investigated the association between stillbirth in an initial pregnancy and risk of stillbirth in a subsequent pregnancy. Stillbirth was defined as fetal death occurring at more than 20 weeks' gestation or a birth weight of at least 400 g. Two reviewers independently screened titles to identify eligible studies based on inclusion and exclusion criteria agreed a priori, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality using scoring criteria from the critical appraisal skills programme. Random effects meta-analyses were used to combine the results of the included studies. Subgroup analysis was performed on studies that examined unexplained stillbirth.
RESULTS: 13 cohort studies and three case-control studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Data were available on 3,412,079 women with pregnancies beyond 20 weeks duration, of who 3,387,538 (99.3%) had had a previous live birth and 24,541 (0.7%) a stillbirth. A total of 14,283 stillbirths occurred in subsequent pregnancies, 606/24,541 (2.5%) in women with a history of stillbirth and 13,677/3,387,538 (0.4%) among women with no such history (pooled odds ratio 4.83, 95% confidence interval 3.77 to 6.18). 12 studies specifically assessed the risk of stillbirth in second pregnancies. Compared with women who had a live birth in their first pregnancy, those who experienced a stillbirth were almost five times more likely to experience a stillbirth in their second pregnancy (odds ratio 4.77, 95% confidence interval 3.70 to 6.15). The pooled odds ratio using the adjusted effect measures from the primary studies was 3.38 (95% confidence interval 2.61 to 4.38). Four studies examined the risk of recurrent unexplained stillbirth. Methodological differences between these studies precluded pooling the results.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of stillbirth in subsequent pregnancies is higher in women who experience a stillbirth in their first pregnancy. This increased risk remained after adjusted analysis. Evidence surrounding the recurrence risk of unexplained stillbirth remains controversial. © Lamont et al 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26109551     DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h3080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  42 in total

1.  Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Gordon Cs Smith; Alexandros A Moraitis; David Wastlund; Jim G Thornton; Aris Papageorghiou; Julia Sanders; Alexander Ep Heazell; Stephen C Robson; Ulla Sovio; Peter Brocklehurst; Edward Cf Wilson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Invited Commentary: The Causal Association Between Obesity and Stillbirth-Strengths and Limitations of the Consecutive-Pregnancies Approach.

Authors:  Jonathan M Snowden; Stephanie A Leonard
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Post-mortem magnetic resonance foetal imaging: a study of morphological correlation with conventional autopsy and histopathological findings.

Authors:  Annamaria Vullo; Valeria Panebianco; Giuseppe Cannavale; Mariarosaria Aromatario; Luigi Cipolloni; Paola Frati; Alessandro Santurro; Francesco Vullo; Carlo Catalano; Vittorio Fineschi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Immunological Basis for Recurrent Fetal Loss and Pregnancy Complications.

Authors:  Hitesh Deshmukh; Sing Sing Way
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 23.472

5.  A Population-Based Matched-Sibling Analysis Estimating the Associations Between First Interpregnancy Interval and Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Annette K Regan; Stephen J Ball; Joshua L Warren; Eva Malacova; Amy Padula; Cicely Marston; Natasha Nassar; Fiona Stanley; Helen Leonard; Nicholas de Klerk; Gavin Pereira
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Care prior to and during subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth for improving outcomes.

Authors:  Aleena M Wojcieszek; Emily Shepherd; Philippa Middleton; Zohra S Lassi; Trish Wilson; Margaret M Murphy; Alexander Ep Heazell; David A Ellwood; Robert M Silver; Vicki Flenady
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-17

7.  Mechanisms of death in structurally normal stillbirths.

Authors:  Percy Pacora; Roberto Romero; Sunil Jaiman; Offer Erez; Gaurav Bhatti; Bogdan Panaitescu; Neta Benshalom-Tirosh; Eun Jung Jung; Chaur-Dong Hsu; Sonia S Hassan; Lami Yeo; Nicholas Kadar
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 2.716

8.  HIV viral load and pregnancy loss: results from a population-based cohort study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Authors:  Yoshan Moodley; Andrew Tomita; Tulio de Oliveira; Frank Tanser
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.632

9.  Recurrence of severe maternal morbidity: A population-based cohort analysis of California women.

Authors:  Shalmali Bane; Elizabeth Wall-Wieler; Audrey Lyndon; Suzan L Carmichael
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.980

10.  Personalized assessment of cervical length improves prediction of spontaneous preterm birth: a standard and a percentile calculator.

Authors:  Dereje W Gudicha; Roberto Romero; Doron Kabiri; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Percy Pacora; Offer Erez; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Eunjung Jung; Carmen Paredes; Stanley M Berry; Lami Yeo; Sonia S Hassan; Chaur-Dong Hsu; Adi L Tarca
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.