Literature DB >> 32146516

Implant survival in uncemented total hip arthroplasty for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures: outcomes of 115 patients in a single center.

Melissa N Dogger1, Bas L Fransen2,3, Inger N Sierevelt2, Peter A Nolte2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There remains disagreement about the use of cemented or uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with a displaced intracapsular femoral neck fracture (FNF). The aim of this study was to assess implant survival, mortality, and postoperative complication rates of uncemented THA for a displaced intracapsular FNF in a single center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 115 patients who received uncemented THAs for a displaced intracapsular FNF was retrospectively examined for implant survival in terms of revision and any reoperation, mortality, and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: The one- and five-year implant survival was 99.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 97.3-100.9) and 97.8% (95% CI 94.7-100.9) for revision and 93.6% (95% CI 88.9-98.3) and 90.0% (95% CI 83.3-96.7) for any reoperation, respectively. Impaired mobility was significantly associated with lower implant survival (p = 0.01). The one, three, and 12 month mortality rates were 2.8% (95% CI 0-5.9), 3.7% (95% CI 0.2-7.2), and 5.6% (95% CI 1.3-9.9), respectively. Postoperative complication rate was 10% with 5% intra-operative fractures.
CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to earlier reports of results of uncemented THA for displaced FNF, the results of this study were comparable with those reported in the literature for cemented THA in displaced FNF with respect to implant survival, mortality, and complication rates. This indicates that uncemented THA could be a viable option for these patients. In future, the additional literature with a prospective design is needed to support and reinforce our conclusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Femoral neck fracture; Implant survival; Revision surgery; Total hip arthroplasty; Uncemented

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32146516     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-020-02652-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  10 in total

1.  Total hip replacement for the treatment of acute femoral neck fractures: results from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales at 3-5 years after surgery.

Authors:  G H Stafford; S C Charman; M J Borroff; C Newell; J K Tucker
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems.

Authors:  Michael Tanzer; Stephen E Graves; Andrea Peng; Andrew J Shimmin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty of the hip in patients with a femoral neck fracture: a comparison of two modern stem design implants.

Authors:  M R M Frenken; M G M Schotanus; E H van Haaren; R Hendrickx
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-04-16

4.  Bone cement implantation syndrome in cemented hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcome.

Authors:  F Olsen; M Kotyra; E Houltz; S-E Ricksten
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Cemented or cementless THA in patients over 80 years with fracture neck of femur: a prospective comparative trial.

Authors:  A S Gavaskar; N C Tummala; M Subramanian
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-08-04

Review 6.  Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA).

Authors:  E Hernlund; A Svedbom; M Ivergård; J Compston; C Cooper; J Stenmark; E V McCloskey; B Jönsson; J A Kanis
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  What is the risk of death or severe harm due to bone cement implantation syndrome among patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of femur? A patient safety surveillance study.

Authors:  Paul D Rutter; Sukhmeet S Panesar; Ara Darzi; Liam J Donaldson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Lower reoperation rate for cemented femoral stem than for uncemented femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty following a displaced femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  Michelle Fog Andersen; Thomas Jakobsen; Anne S Bensen; Niels Krarup
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2015-10-16

9.  More complications with uncemented than cemented femoral stems in total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Ghazi Chammout; Olle Muren; Evaldas Laurencikas; Henrik Bodén; Paula Kelly-Pettersson; Helene Sjöö; André Stark; Olof Sköldenberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty in 30,830 patients with hip fractures: data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register on revision and risk factors for revision.

Authors:  Sophie Moerman; Nina M C Mathijssen; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Anne J H Vochteloo; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.717

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Higher rate of complications with uncemented compared to cemented total hip arthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures: A randomised controlled trial of 50 patients.

Authors:  N D Clement; Marietta van der Linden; J F Keating
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-10-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.