Literature DB >> 23912215

Cemented or cementless THA in patients over 80 years with fracture neck of femur: a prospective comparative trial.

A S Gavaskar1, N C Tummala, M Subramanian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty is associated with a better long term outcome and lesser reoperation rates in the elderly but the risk of complications are believed to be higher in very elderly patients. The study aims to compare the short-term results of cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) in active patients >80 years of age with femoral neck fractures.
METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive patients underwent THA during the study period (cemented--31 and cementless--31). The mean age was 84 years (81-94 years). Patients in both groups were comparable in their preoperative variables. Functional and radiological assessments were carried out using validated outcome measures. Complications were recorded.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were available for final analysis after accounting for deaths and cases lost in follow-up. Of the 51 patients, 25 (49%) regained their pre-injury mobility status and 36 (70%) were community ambulant. Cementless THA was associated with significantly less surgical time, blood loss, transfusion rates and hospital stay. The overall mortality rates, complications, functional and radiological results were similar in both groups though the number of deaths in the perioperative period was significantly high in patients undergoing cemented THA.
CONCLUSION: Satisfactory improvement in function with low reoperation rates can be achieved irrespective of the technique used. Complication rates are higher when compared to younger patients undergoing the procedure. Risks and benefits should be carefully assessed and explained before subjecting these patients to THA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23912215     DOI: 10.1007/s12306-013-0296-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg        ISSN: 2035-5114


  16 in total

1.  Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: outcomes and cost effectiveness.

Authors:  R Iorio; W L Healy; D W Lemos; D Appleby; C A Lucchesi; K J Saleh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Five-year survival of nonagenerian patients undergoing total hip replacement in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  J J Gregory; I Starks; T Aulakh; S J Phillips
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-09

3.  Arthroplasty in the octogenarian: quantifying the risks.

Authors:  Hans J Kreder; Gregory K Berry; Ian A McMurtry; Stephen I Halman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Instability after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B F Morrey
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results.

Authors:  R C Johnston; R H Fitzgerald; W H Harris; R Poss; M E Müller; C B Sledge
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Displaced intracapsular hip fractures in fit, older people: a randomised comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J F Keating; A Grant; M Masson; N W Scott; J F Forbes
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Age-related appearance of muscle trauma in primary total hip arthroplasty and the benefit of a minimally invasive approach for patients older than 70 years.

Authors:  Michael Müller; Stephan Tohtz; Marc Dewey; Ivonne Springer; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in mobile, independent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. A randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  R P Baker; B Squires; M F Gargan; G C Bannister
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Primary total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in older patients: systematic review.

Authors:  Colin Hopley; Dirk Stengel; Axel Ekkernkamp; Michael Wich
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-06-11

10.  A randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients.

Authors:  R Blomfeldt; H Törnkvist; K Eriksson; A Söderqvist; S Ponzer; J Tidermark
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-02
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for the management of femoral neck fractures in the elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Lang Li; Xue Zhao; Xiaodong Yang; Lei Yang; Fei Xing; Xueyang Tang
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Comparison of functional outcomes and complications of cemented vs uncemented total hip arthroplasty in the elderly neck of femur fracture patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Balgovind S Raja; Aditya K S Gowda; Sukhmin Singh; Sajid Ansari; Roop Bhushan Kalia; Souvik Paul
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-04-22

3.  Early Results of a Geriatric Hip Fracture Program in India for Femoral Neck Fracture.

Authors:  Deepak Jain; Guraziz Singh Sidhu; Harpal Singh Selhi; Simon C Mears; Mohammad Yamin; Pankaj Mahindra; Harminder Singh Pannu
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2015-03

4.  Implant survival in uncemented total hip arthroplasty for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures: outcomes of 115 patients in a single center.

Authors:  Melissa N Dogger; Bas L Fransen; Inger N Sierevelt; Peter A Nolte
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-03-07

5.  Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in octogenarian and nonagenarian patients.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toro; Hugo Bothorel; Mo Saffarini; Laurent Jacquot; Julien Chouteau; Jean-Charles Rollier
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-06-02

6.  Comparison between Cementless and Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Il Yoo; Yong-Han Cha; Kap-Jung Kim; Ha-Yong Kim; Won-Sik Choy; Sun-Chul Hwang
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2018-12-06

Review 7.  Clinical Outcomes of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty versus Total Hip Arthroplasty: Assessing the Potential Impact of Cement Use and Pre-Injury Activity Levels in Elderly Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Jun-Il Yoo; Yong-Han Cha; Jung-Taek Kim; Chan-Ho Park
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2019-05-30

8.  Higher rate of complications with uncemented compared to cemented total hip arthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures: A randomised controlled trial of 50 patients.

Authors:  N D Clement; Marietta van der Linden; J F Keating
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-10-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.