Literature DB >> 24113837

Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA).

E Hernlund1, A Svedbom, M Ivergård, J Compston, C Cooper, J Stenmark, E V McCloskey, B Jönsson, J A Kanis.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This report describes the epidemiology, burden, and treatment of osteoporosis in the 27 countries of the European Union (EU27).
INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is characterized by reduced bone mass and disruption of bone architecture, resulting in increased risk of fragility fractures which represent the main clinical consequence of the disease. Fragility fractures are associated with substantial pain and suffering, disability and even death for affected patients and substantial costs to society. The aim of this report was to characterize the burden of osteoporosis in the EU27 in 2010 and beyond.
METHODS: The literature on fracture incidence and costs of fractures in the EU27 was reviewed and incorporated into a model estimating the clinical and economic burden of osteoporotic fractures in 2010.
RESULTS: Twenty-two million women and 5.5 million men were estimated to have osteoporosis; and 3.5 million new fragility fractures were sustained, comprising 610,000 hip fractures, 520,000 vertebral fractures, 560,000 forearm fractures and 1,800,000 other fractures (i.e. fractures of the pelvis, rib, humerus, tibia, fibula, clavicle, scapula, sternum and other femoral fractures). The economic burden of incident and prior fragility fractures was estimated at <euro> 37 billion. Incident fractures represented 66 % of this cost, long-term fracture care 29 % and pharmacological prevention 5 %. Previous and incident fractures also accounted for 1,180,000 quality-adjusted life years lost during 2010. The costs are expected to increase by 25 % in 2025. The majority of individuals who have sustained an osteoporosis-related fracture or who are at high risk of fracture are untreated and the number of patients on treatment is declining.
CONCLUSIONS: In spite of the high social and economic cost of osteoporosis, a substantial treatment gap and projected increase of the economic burden driven by the aging populations, the use of pharmacological interventions to prevent fractures has decreased in recent years, suggesting that a change in healthcare policy is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24113837      PMCID: PMC3880487          DOI: 10.1007/s11657-013-0136-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Osteoporos            Impact factor:   2.617


  706 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic drugs to prevent secondary fragility fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T Saito; J M Sterbenz; S Malay; L Zhong; M P MacEachern; K C Chung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Prevalence of malnutrition in a cohort of 509 patients with acute hip fracture: the importance of a comprehensive assessment.

Authors:  M Díaz de Bustamante; T Alarcón; R Menéndez-Colino; R Ramírez-Martín; Á Otero; J I González-Montalvo
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Self-perception of fracture risk: what can it tell us?

Authors:  A E Litwic; J E Compston; A Wyman; E S Siris; S H Gehlbach; J D Adachi; R Chapurlat; A Díez-Pérez; A Z LaCroix; J W Nieves; J C Netelenbos; J Pfeilschifter; M Rossini; C Roux; K G Saag; S Silverman; N B Watts; S L Greenspan; L March; C L Gregson; C Cooper; E M Dennison
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  The epidemiology of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael A Clynes; Nicholas C Harvey; Elizabeth M Curtis; Nicholas R Fuggle; Elaine M Dennison; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.291

5.  Osteosarcopenia.

Authors:  James Paintin; Cyrus Cooper; Elaine Dennison
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 0.825

Review 6.  Clinical guidelines for the application of panoramic radiographs in screening for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Akira Taguchi; Ray Tanaka; Naoya Kakimoto; Yasuhiro Morimoto; Yoshinori Arai; Takafumi Hayashi; Tohru Kurabayashi; Akitoshi Katsumata; Junichi Asaumi
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  The Limited Clinical Utility of Testosterone, Estradiol, and Sex Hormone Binding Globulin Measurements in the Prediction of Fracture Risk and Bone Loss in Older Men.

Authors:  Eric S Orwoll; Jodi Lapidus; Patty Y Wang; Liesbeth Vandenput; Andrew Hoffman; Howard A Fink; Gail A Laughlin; Maria Nethander; Östen Ljunggren; Andreas Kindmark; Mattias Lorentzon; Magnus K Karlsson; Dan Mellström; Anthony Kwok; Sundeep Khosla; Timothy Kwok; Claes Ohlsson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  The role of sarcopenia in the risk of osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  A Oliveira; C Vaz
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Is Partial or Total Thyroidectomy Associated with Risk of Long-Term Osteoporosis: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Chien-Ling Hung; Chih-Ching Yeh; Pi-Shan Sung; Chung-Jye Hung; Chih-Hsin Muo; Fung-Chang Sung; I-Ming Jou; Kuen-Jer Tsai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Osteoporosis: what the clinician needs to know?

Authors:  Rosario Francesco Balzano; Maria Mattera; Xiaoguang Cheng; Samantha Cornacchia; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.