| Literature DB >> 32144293 |
R Castro-Viñuelas1,2,3, C Sanjurjo-Rodríguez4,5,6,7,8, M Piñeiro-Ramil4,6,8, T Hermida-Gómez9,5,6,8, S Rodríguez-Fernández4,6,8, N Oreiro9,5,6,8, J de Toro4,5,6,8, I Fuentes4,5,6,8, F J Blanco9,5,6,8, S Díaz-Prado10,11,12,13.
Abstract
Knowledge and research results about hand osteoarthritis (hOA) are limited due to the lack of samples and animal models of the disease. Here, we report the generation of two induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-lines from patients with radiographic hOA. Furthermore, we wondered whether these iPSC-lines carried single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within genes that have been associated with hOA. Finally, we performed chondrogenic differentiation of the iPSCs in order to prove their usefulness as cellular models of the disease. We performed a non-integrative reprogramming of dermal fibroblasts obtained from two patients with radiographic rhizarthrosis and non-erosive hOA by introducing the transcriptional factors Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc using Sendai virus. After reprogramming, embryonic stem cell-like colonies emerged in culture, which fulfilled all the criteria to be considered iPSCs. Both iPSC-lines carried variants associated with hOA in the four studied genes and showed differences in their chondrogenic capacity when compared with a healthy control iPSC-line. To our knowledge this is the first time that the generation of iPSC-lines from patients with rhizarthrosis and non-erosive hOA is reported. The obtained iPSC-lines might enable us to model the disease in vitro, and to deeper study both the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying hOA.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32144293 PMCID: PMC7060311 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61071-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Characterization of fibroblasts and reprogramming process. (a) Images of hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining, type I collagen (COL-1), acidic fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4) and vimentin immunostainings performed on fibroblast cultures, obtained from the OA patients 1 and 2. Scale 100 μm. (b) Phase contrast images taken after fibroblasts isolation (scale 200 μm) and reprogramming, showing the morphological changes occurred after transduction (scale 200 μm and 50 μm, respectively), as well as iPSC colonies morphology one (scale 200 μm) and three weeks after reprogramming (scale 200 μm and 50 μm, respectively). The black arrow points the high nucleus/cytoplasm ratio found in the iPSC-colonies.
Figure 2Alkaline phosphatase activity and relative expression levels of the endogenous reprogramming factors and pluripotency markers in the reprogrammed cells. (a) Alkaline phosphatase staining of iPSCs colonies at passage 0 and iPSCs lines MOA1-FiPS4F#7 and MOA2-FiPS4F#17 with more than 20 passages in culture. Scale bar 100 μm. (b) Table showing the relative expression levels (REL) of endogenous reprogramming factors (OCT4 ENDO, SOX2 ENDO, KLF4 ENDO, CMYC ENDO), pluripotency markers (CRIPTO, NANOG) and Sendai virus reprogramming factor CMYC (CMYC SeV) in the analysed clones and parental fibroblasts of OA patient 1 and OA patient 2. (c) Bar graphs with qRT-PCR data showing the REL of endogenous reprogramming factors and pluripotency markers.
Figure 3Immunofluorescence analisys of pluripotency-associated markers. (a) Immunofluorescence staining showing presence of pluripotency markers NANOG, OCT-4, SOX2, SSEA-4 and TRA-1-81 in the iPSC-line MOA1-FiPS4F#7. Scale 100 μm. (b) Immunofluorescence staining showing presence of pluripotency markers NANOG (scale 100 μm), OCT-4 (scale 50 μm), SOX2 (scale 50 μm), SSEA-4 (scale 100 μm) and TRA-1-81 (scale 100 μm) in the iPSC-line MOA2-FiPS4F#17.
Figure 4Analysis of the functional pluripotency in the reprogrammed cells. (a) Scheme representing the hanging drop technique used to form embryoid bodies (EBs). EBs were generated to study trilineage differentiation of the iPSC-lines. (b) Immunofluorescence staining showing presence of α-fetoprotein (AFP, ectoderm), α-smooth muscle actin (SMA, mesoderm) and β-III-Tubulin (TUJ1, ectoderm) in the iPSC-lines MOA1-FiPS4F#7 and MOA2-FiPS4F#17. DNA was counterstained with DAPI (scale 50 μm).
Figure 5Identity and karyotype analysis of the generated iPSC-lines. (a) DNA fingerprinting analysis showing that iPSC-lines MOA1-FiPS4F#7 and MOA2-FiPS4F#17 come from patients’ fibroblasts. The short tandem repeat (STR) locations studied were: D5S818, D13S317, D7S820, D16S539, VWA, TH01, AMELOGENIN, TPOX, CSF and D21S11. (b) Whole genome view obtained after the KaryoStat™ analysis of both patient fibroblasts’ and iPSC-lines. The whole genome view displays all somatic and sex chromosomes in one frame with high-level copy number. The smooth signal plot (right y-axis) is the smoothing of the log2 ratios, which depict the signal intensities of probes on the microarray. A value of 2 represents a normal copy number state (CN = 2). A value of 3 represents chromosomal gain (CN = 3). A value of 1 represents a chromosomal loss (CN = 1). The pink, green and yellow colors indicate the raw signal for each individual chromosome probe, while the blue signal represents the normalized probe signal which is used to identify copy number and aberrations (if any).
Summary of the allelic varints detected after single nucleotide polymorphism analysis of the iPSC-lines generated.
| Genotype | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | SNP | At-risk allele | MOA1-FiPS4F#7 | MOA2-FiPS4F#17 |
| GDF5 | rs143383 | T | CT | CT |
| SMAD3 | rs12901499 | G | GG | GG |
| ALDH1A2 | rs3204689 | C | CC | CT |
| IL1 | rs2287047 | T | CT | CT |
GDF5 (growth differentiation factor 5); SMAD3 (SMAD family member 3); ALDH1A2 (aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family A2); IL1-R1 (interleukine 1 receptor 1); SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism); MOA1-FiPS4F#7 (iPSC-line from patient with rhizarthrosis and non-erosive hand OA in the right hand); MOA2-FiPS4F#17 (iPSC-line from patient with rhizarthrosis and non-erosive hand OA in both hands).
Figure 6Directed chondrogenic differentiation of the iPSCs. (a) General scheme of the differentiation protocol. (b) Histological evaluation by means of Masson’s trichromic (MT) and safranin O (SO) staining of the chondrogenic differentiation of the iPSC-line derived from a healthy donor (N1-FiPS4F#7) and the iPSC-lines generated from patients with hand OA (MO1-FiPS4F#7 and MOA2-FiPS4F#17). x20 magnification.
Figure 7Time course of the followed reprogramming protocol to generate human iPSC-lines.
Table showing the primer sets used to assess the presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms within the genes GDF5 (variant rs143383), SMAD3 (rs12901499), IL1-R1 (variant rs2287047) AND A2BP1 (variant rs716508).
| Gene | SNP | Primer Forward (5′-3′) | Primer Reverse (5′-3′) | Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDF5 | rs143383 | caggcctgtgagtgtgtgtg | cagcagtagcagcagaagga | 376 bp |
| SMAD3 | rs12901499 | ttaaagcaggggagtggcac | aagcacaggcccccaaatta | 368 bp |
| ALDH1A2 | rs3204689 | ctcttccaaggagatgtcagc | acacacacaccccaaaactg | 332 bp |
| IL1-R1 | rs2287047 | accagcctccagagaagaaa | gtgcatagctgactttggatgt | 411 bp |
GDF5 (growth differentiation factor 5); SMAD3 (SMAD family member 3); ALDH1A2 (aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family A2); IL1-R1 (interleukine 1 receptor 1); SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism); bp (base pair).