| Literature DB >> 32143184 |
Jèssica Latorre1, Francisco J Ortega2, Laura Liñares-Pose3, José M Moreno-Navarrete1, Aina Lluch4, Ferran Comas1, Núria Oliveras-Cañellas4, Wifredo Ricart1, Marcus Höring5, You Zhou6, Gerhard Liebisch5, P A Nidhina Haridas7, Vesa M Olkkonen8, Miguel López9, José M Fernández-Real10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While the impact ofEntities:
Keywords: AMPK; Fatty acid homeostasis; Hepatocytes; MicroRNAs; Steatosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32143184 PMCID: PMC7056650 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102697
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EBioMedicine ISSN: 2352-3964 Impact factor: 8.143
Fig. 1Palmitate, compound C and metformin modify lipid deposition and AMPK activity in hepatocytes. Oil Red O staining in a) primary human hepatocytes (HH) and b) HepG2 cells challenged with palmitate (PA), compound C (CC) and metformin (Mtf), and control (CTRL). Optical density (OD) was measured and relative quantification of the Oil Red O staining is shown in plots. Charts show percent (%) of variation for gene expression measures obtained in treated c) HH and d) HepG2 cells versus respective vehicle as control. Color-scale goes from red (increased) to green (decreased). Western blots show results for phospho-AMPK (pAMPK, Thr172) and total AMPK in treated e) HH and f) HepG2 cells versus respective vehicle as control. pAMPK signal was computed relative to total AMPK, and total AMPK signal was normalized against β-actin. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n ≥ 2 replicates/ cell/ treatment, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01 [Student t-test]).
Fig. 2Palmitate, compound C and metformin impact miRNA expression patterns in hepatocytes. a) Volcano plots represent changes in miRNA expression profiles assessed in primary human hepatocytes (HH) challenged with palmitate (PA), compound C (CC) and metformin (Mtf). Red circles stand for statistically significant miRNAs (p<0.05). Venn diagrams plot the number of decreased/ increased miRNA upon treatments with PA (blue), CC (red) and Mtf (green). The number of hepatic miRNAs with significant alteration is depicted in the bar plots. b) Statistically significant variations detected in miRNA quantities for at least one of the treatments. Color-scale goes from red (increased) to green (decreased). c) TaqMan assessment and expression levels of preselected miRNA hits in both HH and HepG2. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n ≥ 3 replicates/ cell/ treatment, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01 [Student t-test]).
Fig. 3AMPK and DICER knockdown enhances lipid accumulation in hepatocytes. a) Oil Red O staining of AMPK and DICER knockdown (KD), and control HepG2 cells transfected with lentiviral negative control vector containing scrambled sh-RNA (CTRL). Optical density (O.D.) was measured at 500 nm. b) Gene expression and c) miRNA hits assessed in AMPK (a.k.a. PRKAA1) and DICER KD versus scrambled control cells. d) Impact of compound C (CC) and metformin (Mtf) on d) measures of Oil Red O staining, e) gene expression patterns, and f) miRNA candidates in sh-RNA scrambled, AMPK KD and DICER KD hepatocytes. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01 [One-Way ANOVA corrected for multiple comparisons by the Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) test]).
Fig. 4Impact of hepatic AMPK knockdown in vivo. a) Hepatic levels of phospho(p)-ACC protein levels normalized by β-actin. b) Oil Red O stained area in liver samples, and c) milligrams of triglyceride (TG) content normalized by grams of tissue. d) Gene and e) miRNA expression in mice subjected to tail-injection of AMPK sh-RNA lentivirus (AMPK-DN, n = 9) vs vehicle (VH, n = 7). Data is expressed as mean ± SEM (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01 [Student t-test]).
Fig. 5Impact of miRNA candidates on lipid metabolism. a) Lipid droplet staining in Huh7 cells transfected with a non-targeting (NT) miRNA control and different mimic miRNA candidates. Bar plots show average of lipid droplet area vs cell number. Bodipy 493/503 (green) and DAPI (blue) report lipid droplets and nuclei, respectively. b) Triglyceride, diacylglycerol, and cholesterol esters (c.p.m. per ng protein) measured by thin-layer chromatography in HepG2 cells transfected with mimic miR-16, miR-30b, miR-30c, and NT miRNA control. c) Triglycerides and cholesterol content (mmol/ L per ng of protein) in culture supernatants. d) Apolipoprotein B (apoB) measures (ng/ µg cell protein). e) Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) in NT controls (orange dots), and HepG2 cells transfected with mimic miR-16 (green squares), miR-30b (straight red triangles), and miR-30c (inverted blue triangles). Seahorse quantification (pmol/ min/ µg protein) is shown in the plot. f) Heatmap showing predicted miRNA/ pathways clusters interaction, according to DIANA-miRPath v3.0 and TarBase v7.0. g) Expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism upon treatments with mimic miRNA candidates. h) Huh7 cells transfected with a wild-type control (WT) ACSL1 3′UTR dual Luc reporter and with mutated ACSL1 3′UTR (MUT). Firefly Luc activity normalized for Renilla signal is shown in plots. i) Western blot results for ACSL1 in HepG2 cells after transfection with NT miRNA control or mimic miRNA candidates (n = 4/ treatment). The ACSL1 signal was quantified and normalized against total protein. Complementary target region for ACSL1 (WT and MUT) and miRNA candidates is also shown. Data in plots is expressed as mean ± SEM (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01 [One-Way ANOVA corrected by the Fisher's LSD test] for comparisons mimic vs NT miRNA control; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 [Student t-test] for comparisons mutated ACSL1 3′UTR vs WT cells).
Fig. 6Impact of mimic miR-16, miR-30b and miR-30c on lipid species. a) Principal component analysis (PCA) of lipid classes and families affected by treatments of a non-targeting (NT) miRNA control and mimic miRNA candidates in HepG2 cells. The intensity of red color-scale indicates relative presence of each lipid. b) Lipid species grouped in families significantly affected by mimic miR-16, miR-30b, and/or miR-30c. c) Expression of genes related to the synthesis and degradation of phosphatidylethanolamine plasmalogens (PEP), sphingomyelins and ceramides, and those associated with the formation of lipid droplets (LD). Data is expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 4 replicates/ treatment, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01 [One-Way ANOVA corrected by the Fisher's LSD test]).
Fig. 7Ectopic recovery of miR-30b and miR-30c protects against steatosis. a) Lipid droplet staining in HepG2 cells transfected with non-targeting (NT) control miRNA, miR-30b and miR-30c. Bodipy 493/503 (green) and DAPI (blue) report lipid droplets and nuclei, respectively. b) Bar plots represent relative lipid droplet area per cell area, the value for NT cells set at 100 (n = 3 replicates/ model/ treatment). c) Expression of genes related to FA biosynthesis, glucose intake, and β-oxidation after mimic transfection in treatments leading to increased FA deposition (i.e. AMPK and DICER knockdown (KD), and cells challenged with CC; n = 4 replicates/ model/ treatment). Data is expressed as mean ± SEM (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01 [One-Way ANOVA corrected by the Fisher's LSD test]).
Fig. 8Gene and hepatic miRNA expression in subjects with different degrees of steatosis. a) Expression of miR-16, miR-30b, miR-30c, ACSL1, DICER and AMPK (a.k.a. PRKAA1) in liver samples of obese women with different degrees of hepatosteatosis. b) Spearmans’ correlations between miRNA and gene expression levels, body mass index (BMI), and fasting triglycerides (TGs) (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01, ns not significant). Data in bar plots is expressed as mean ± SD (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01 [One-Way ANOVA corrected by the Fisher's LSD test]).