| Literature DB >> 32138364 |
Maria Aparecida Cunha1, Mario Vianna Vettore1, Thiago Resende Dos Santos2, Antônio Thomaz Matta-Machado3, Simone Dutra Lucas1, Mauro Henrique Nogueira Guimarães Abreu1.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate factors associated with dental prosthesis procedures by oral health teams (OHTs) in the Brazilian primary health care in 2013-2014, who participated in the National Program for Improving Access and Quality of Primary Health Care (PMAQ-AB). This is an analytical cross-sectional study using a questionnaire with dichotomous questions applied in 18,114 OHTs. The dependent variable studied was making any type of prosthesis (removable or fixed). Independent variables involved issues related to human resources and health service management. Data were submitted to simple and multiple binary logistic regression with odds ratio calculation, 95% confidence intervals, and p-values. Most OHTs (57%) do not perform any dental prosthesis. The teams that are more likely to perform dental prostheses have human resources-related characteristics, such as professionals admitted through public examinations (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.14-1.36) and those involved in permanent education (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.26). Moreover, OHTs with a more organized work process and that receive more significant support from municipal management are more likely to perform dental prostheses (p < 0.05). The oral health teams which tended to provide the most dental prostheses to benefit patients were; hired as civil servants, had a municipal career plan, involved all members of the oral health team, and trained undergraduate dental students from outreach programs. Better organizational support and improved work incentives may be needed to get the majority of oral health teams to start providing dental prostheses to their patients.Entities:
Keywords: dental prosthesis; primary health care; public health
Year: 2020 PMID: 32138364 PMCID: PMC7084312 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17051646
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Association of human resources and work process variables with provision of dental prostheses in Primary Dental Care in Brazil.
| Variable | N (%) | Crude OR (95% CI) | P-Value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Seniority of the professional in the current oral health team | |||||
| Up to 2 years | 10,373 (57.3%) | 1 | |||
| More than 2 years | 7741 (42.7%) | 1.21 (1.14–1.28) | <0.001 | ||
| Type of employer | |||||
| Direct Administration | 14,871 (82.1%) | 1 | |||
| Others | 3243 (17.9%) | 1.11 (1.03–1.20) | <0.001 | ||
| Type of working contract | |||||
| Others | 10,121 (55.9%) | 1 | |||
| Civil servant | 7,993 (44.1%) | 1.19 (1.12–1.27) | <0.001 | ||
| Admission process | |||||
| Others | 9065 (50.0%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Public tender | 9049 (50.0%) | 1.32 (1.25–1.41) | <0.001 | 1.25 (1.14–1.36) | <0.001 |
| Municipal career development plan * | |||||
| Yes | 2986 (16.5%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| No | 11,468 (63.3%) | 0.69 (0.64–0.75) | <0.001 | 0.85 (0.76–0.94) | <0.001 |
| Participation in seminars, workshops and group discussions within the PHC unit | |||||
| Yes | 11,504 (63.5%) | 1 | |||
| No | 6610 (36.5%) | 0.66 (0.62–0.70) | <0.001 | ||
| Professionals of the oral health team involved in CPD * | |||||
| Dentist or any dental assistant | 2622 (14.5%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| All members of the oral health team | 12,090 (66.7%) | 1.38 (1.25–1.51) | <0.001 | 1.13 (1.02–1.26) | <0.001 |
| CPD sessions consider the perceived needs of the oral health team * | |||||
| Yes | 10,959 (60.5%) | 1 | |||
| No | 3753 (20.7%) | 0.81 (0.76–0.88) | <0.001 | ||
| Oral health team hosts undergraduate dental students from outreach program * | |||||
| No | 2296 (12.7%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 12,416 (68.5%) | 1.68 (1.54–1.84) | <0.001 | 1.42 (1.27–1.59) | <0.001 |
| Higher degree | |||||
| Specialization, Master of Science or PhD | 5533 (30.5%) | 1 | |||
| Undergraduate degree | 12,581 (69.5%) | 1.18 (1.10–1.25) | <0.001 | ||
|
| |||||
| Assessment of dental prosthesis needs of the population | |||||
| Yes | 9504 (52.5%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| No | 8610 (47.5%) | 0.20 (0.19–0.21) | <0.001 | 0.24 (0.22–0.26) | <0.001 |
| Planning and scheduling activities of the oral health team on monthly basis | |||||
| Yes | 14,950 (82.5%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| No | 3164 (17.5%) | 0.87 (0.79–0.96) | <0.05 | 0.86 (0.77–0.97) | <0.05 |
| Monitoring and analysis of oral health indicators | |||||
| Yes | 12,031 (66.4%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| No | 6083 (33.6%) | 0.58 (0.55–0.63) | <0.05 | 0.88 (0.80–0.96) | <0.05 |
| Receives financial support for planning and organization of the work process | |||||
| Yes | 14,303 (79.0%) | 1 | |||
| No | 3811 (21.0%) | 0.58 (0.54–0.62) | <0.001 | ||
| Receives management support from the municipal health department | |||||
| Yes | 14,925 (82.4%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| No | 3,189 (17.6%) | 0.20 (0.19–0.21) | <0.001 | 0.24 (0.22–0.26) | <0.001 |
| Receives information from the health surveillance system | |||||
| Yes | 14,454 (79.8%) | 1 | |||
| No | 3,660 (20.2%) | 0.62 (0.57–0.66) | <0.001 | ||
| Receives local epidemiological information | |||||
| Yes | 14,518 (80.1%) | 1 | |||
| No | 3596 (19.9%) | 0.58 (0.54–0.62) | <0.001 | ||
| Attends primary health care team meetings | |||||
| Always/sometimes | 16,918 (93.4%) | 1 | |||
| Never | 1196 (6.6%) | 0.51 (0.45–0.58) | <0.001 | ||
| Goals in primary health care agreed with the municipal health department | |||||
| Yes | 15,541 (85.8%) | 1 | |||
| No | 2573 (14.2%) | 0.65 (0.59–0.70) | <0.001 | ||
| Existence of specialized dental services | |||||
| Yes | 11,178 (61.7%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| No | 6936 (38.3%) | 0.36 (0.34–0.39) | <0.001 | 0.44 (0.40–0.48) | <0.001 |
* For these variables there are some missing data. OR: Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval; PHC: Primary Health Care; CPD: Continuum Professional Development.