Literature DB >> 32135438

Low-concentration tracer tests to measure air-water interfacial area in porous media.

Mark L Brusseau1, Ying Lyu2, Ni Yan3, Bo Guo4.   

Abstract

The aqueous-based interfacial tracer method employing miscible-displacement tests is one method available for measuring air-water interfacial areas. One potential limitation to the method is the impact of tracer-induced drainage on the system. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a low-concentration tracer test method for measuring air-water interfacial area. Tracer concentrations and analytical methods were selected that allowed the use of tracer input concentrations that were below the threshold of tracer-induced drainage. Multiple tracer tests were conducted at different water saturations. Interfacial areas increased from 34.8 to 101 cm-1 with the decrease in saturation from 0.86 to 0.62. The method produced relatively robust measurements of air-water interfacial area, with coefficients of variation ranging from 6 to 26%. A variably saturated flow and transport model that accounts for the effects of tracer on interfacial tension, and the retention of tracer at the air-water and solid-water interfaces, was used to test for potential tracer-induced drainage. The simulations showed that the use of low tracer-input concentrations eliminated this phenomenon. This is consistent with the measured data for effluent-sample masses, which exhibited minimal change during the tests, and with the observation that the interfacial areas obtained with the low-concentration-tracer method were consistent with values measured with two methods that are not influenced by tracer-induced drainage. These results demonstrate that the low-concentration miscible-displacement tracer test method is an effective approach for measuring air-water interfacial areas in porous media.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluid-fluid interfaces; Interfacial adsorption; Interfacial partitioning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32135438      PMCID: PMC7654433          DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  11 in total

1.  Determination of NAPL-water interfacial areas in well-characterized porous media.

Authors:  Richard Dobson; Martin H Schroth; Mart Oostrom; Josef Zeyer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Measuring air-water interfacial areas with X-ray microtomography and interfacial partitioning tracer tests.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Sheng Peng; Gregory Schnaar; Asami Murao
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Gaseous transport of volatile organic chemicals in unsaturated porous media: effect of water-partitioning and air-water interfacial adsorption.

Authors:  H Kim; M D Annable; P S Rao
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Implications of surfactant-induced flow for miscible-displacement estimation of air-water interfacial areas in unsaturated porous media.

Authors:  Molly S Costanza-Robinson; Zheng Zheng; Eric J Henry; Benjamin D Estabrook; Malcolm H Littlefield
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Adsorption of PFOA at the Air-Water Interface during Transport in Unsaturated Porous Media.

Authors:  Ying Lyu; Mark L Brusseau; Wei Chen; Ni Yan; Xiaori Fu; Xueyu Lin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  The Gas-absorption/Chemical-reaction Method for Measuring Air-water Interfacial Area in Natural Porous Media.

Authors:  Ying Lyu; Mark L Brusseau; Asma El Ouni; Juliana B Araujo; Xiaosi Su
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 5.240

7.  Novel methods for measuring air-water interfacial area in unsaturated porous media.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Asma El Ouni; Juliana B Araujo; Hua Zhong
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  Comparison of Fluid-Fluid Interfacial Areas Measured with X-ray Microtomography and Interfacial Partitioning Tracer Tests for the same Samples.

Authors:  Kieran McDonald; Kenneth C Carroll; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 5.240

9.  SYNCHROTRON X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY AND INTERFACIAL PARTITIONING TRACER TEST MEASUREMENTS OF NAPL-WATER INTERFACIAL AREAS.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Hilary Janousek; Asami Murao; Gregory Schnaar
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.240

10.  Measuring air-water interfacial area for soils using the mass balance surfactant-tracer method.

Authors:  Juliana B Araujo; Jon Mainhagu; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 7.086

View more
  4 in total

1.  Air-water interfacial areas relevant for transport of per and poly-fluoroalkyl substances.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Bo Guo
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Testing the Validity of the Miscible-Displacement Interfacial Tracer Method for Measuring Air-Water Interfacial Area: Independent Benchmarking and Mathematical Modeling.

Authors:  Asma El Ouni; Bo Guo; Hua Zhong; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Impact of a Hydrocarbon Surfactant on the Retention and Transport of Perfluorooctanoic Acid in Saturated and Unsaturated Porous Media.

Authors:  Yifan Ji; Ni Yan; Mark L Brusseau; Bo Guo; Xilai Zheng; Mengfan Dai; Hejie Liu; Xin Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 11.357

4.  Ideal versus Nonideal Transport of PFAS in Unsaturated Porous Media.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Bo Guo; Dandan Huang; Ni Yan; Ying Lyu
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 13.400

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.