Literature DB >> 29662253

The Gas-absorption/Chemical-reaction Method for Measuring Air-water Interfacial Area in Natural Porous Media.

Ying Lyu1,2,3,4, Mark L Brusseau4,5, Asma El Ouni4, Juliana B Araujo4, Xiaosi Su3,6.   

Abstract

The gas-absorption/chemical-reaction (GACR) method used in Chemical Engineering to quantify gas-liquid interfacial area in reactor systems is adapted for the first time to measure the effective air-water interfacial area of natural porous media. Experiments were conducted with the GACR method, and two standard methods (x-ray microtomographic imaging and interfacial partitioning tracer tests) for comparison, using model glass beads and a natural sand. The results of a series of experiments conducted under identical conditions demonstrated that the GACR method exhibited excellent repeatability for maintaining constant water saturation and for measurement of interfacial area (Aia). Coefficients of variation for Aia were 3.5% for the glass beads and 11% for the sand. Estimated maximum interfacial areas (Am) obtained with the GACR method were statistically identical to independent measures of the specific solid surface areas of the media. For example, the Am for the glass beads is 29 (±1) cm-1, compared to 32 (±3), 30 (±2), and 31 (±2) cm-1 determined from geometric calculation, N2/BET measurement, and microtomographic measurement, respectively. This indicates that the method produced accurate measures of interfacial area. Interfacial areas determined with the GACR method were similar to those obtained with the standard methods. For example, Aias of 47 and 44 cm-1 were measured with the GACR and XMT methods, respectively, for the sand at a water saturation of 0.57. The results of the study indicate that the GACR method is a viable alternative for measuring air-water interfacial areas. The method is relatively quick, inexpensive, and requires no specialized instrumentation compared to the standard methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fluid-fluid interface; gas absorption; interfacial area

Year:  2017        PMID: 29662253      PMCID: PMC5898451          DOI: 10.1002/2017WR021717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Resour Res        ISSN: 0043-1397            Impact factor:   5.240


  23 in total

1.  Colloid retention at the meniscus-wall contact line in an open microchannel.

Authors:  Yuniati Zevi; Bin Gao; Wei Zhang; Verónica L Morales; M Ekrem Cakmak; Evelyn A Medrano; Wenjing Sang; Tammo S Steenhuis
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  A pore-scale investigation of a multiphase porous media system.

Authors:  Riyadh I Al-Raoush; Clinton S Willson
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.188

3.  Impact of wettability on pore-scale characteristics of residual nonaqueous phase liquids.

Authors:  Riyadh I Al-Raoush
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  The two-phase flow IPTT method for measurement of nonwetting-wetting liquid interfacial areas at higher nonwetting saturations in natural porous media.

Authors:  Hua Zhong; Asma El Ouni; Dan Lin; Bingguo Wang; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2016-07-24       Impact factor: 5.240

5.  Modeling the transport of TiO2 nanoparticle aggregates in saturated and unsaturated granular media: effects of ionic strength and pH.

Authors:  Jing Fang; Mei-jia Xu; Deng-jun Wang; Bei Wen; Jing-yi Han
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  A pore scale investigation of crude oil distribution and removal from homogeneous porous media during surfactant-induced remediation.

Authors:  Jaydeep Ghosh; Geoffrey R Tick
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 3.188

7.  COMPARISON OF INTERFACIAL PARTITIONING TRACER TEST AND HIGH-RESOLUTION MICROTOMOGRAPHY MEASUREMENTS OF FLUID-FLUID INTERFACIAL AREAS FOR AN IDEAL POROUS MEDIUM.

Authors:  Matt Narter; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.240

8.  Novel methods for measuring air-water interfacial area in unsaturated porous media.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Asma El Ouni; Juliana B Araujo; Hua Zhong
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Comparison of Fluid-Fluid Interfacial Areas Measured with X-ray Microtomography and Interfacial Partitioning Tracer Tests for the same Samples.

Authors:  Kieran McDonald; Kenneth C Carroll; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 5.240

10.  Measurement and estimation of organic-liquid/water interfacial areas for several natural porous media.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; M Narter; G Schnaar; J Marble
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  4 in total

1.  Low-concentration tracer tests to measure air-water interfacial area in porous media.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Ying Lyu; Ni Yan; Bo Guo
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  Assessing XMT-Measurement Variability of Air-Water Interfacial Areas in Natural Porous Media.

Authors:  Juliana B Araujo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2019-11-17       Impact factor: 5.240

3.  Novel fluid-fluid interface domains in geologic media.

Authors:  Juliana B Araújo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.238

4.  Examining the robustness and concentration dependency of PFAS air-water and NAPL-water interfacial adsorption coefficients.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 11.236

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.